23.02.2014 Views

Saddleback Journal of Biology - Saddleback College

Saddleback Journal of Biology - Saddleback College

Saddleback Journal of Biology - Saddleback College

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Fall 2009 <strong>Biology</strong> 3B Paper<br />

ones. With this in mind, we set out to determine the<br />

density <strong>of</strong> common tide pool organisms for two<br />

locations. The locations where our research was<br />

conducted were at Doheny State Beach, California and<br />

Treasure Island, California in November <strong>of</strong> 2009.<br />

Locations were chosen due to contamination<br />

differences between both locations, this may<br />

potentially have an effect on the density <strong>of</strong> the<br />

organisms. These variations in density, with time may<br />

have a much greater impact on the organism’s ability to<br />

survive and since they are a basic food source for fish,<br />

and fish are a basic food source for people, an<br />

extinction <strong>of</strong> fish will be catastrophic. According to<br />

Natural Resources Defense Council, recent reports<br />

released on July <strong>of</strong> 2009, Testing the Waters 2009 A<br />

Guide to Water Quality at Vacation Beaches, have<br />

determined that “Doheny State Beach violated the<br />

state’s bacterial standards as much as 49 percent <strong>of</strong> the<br />

time in 2008. Doheny remains among the most<br />

contaminated according to bacterial measurements.<br />

The average percentage that showed unsafe bacteria<br />

levels for Doheny in 2008 was 36%, compared to<br />

Laguna Beach at 0%, indicating very low levels <strong>of</strong><br />

unsafe bacteria.” Chronic contamination has been a<br />

problem for years at Doheny, and scientists are still<br />

investigating likely causes. Such causes may include,<br />

but not directly related, is “an abundance <strong>of</strong> Carbon<br />

Dioxide changes the chemistry <strong>of</strong> the sea causing the<br />

life for most marine organisms to be in danger<br />

(Caldeira 2003).” Water temperature, rising pH levels,<br />

directly related to water temperature, depth, tidal<br />

amplitude, and turbidity are important factors <strong>of</strong><br />

increased water contamination (Cha 2004). These<br />

factors may potentially cause a change in density for<br />

the tide pools.<br />

Among the organisms discovered in the tide<br />

pools, were the Sea anemone (Amthopleura<br />

xanthogrammica), California mussel (Mytilus<br />

californianus), Blue Banded hermit crab (Pagurus<br />

samuelis), and the Black Turban snail (Tegula<br />

funebralis). These organisms were chosen for our study<br />

due to its availability and allow for accurate data. All<br />

organisms were present at both locations. Efforts in<br />

reducing water contamination in our local beaches will<br />

benefit marine organisms by increasing their means <strong>of</strong><br />

survival in intertidal ecosystems and ultimately, benefit<br />

the human race.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

The observation <strong>of</strong> marine organisms in the<br />

tide pools at Doheny State Beach and Treasure Island<br />

was done on November 14, 2009 at low tide. Six tide<br />

pools at each location were selected to be observed<br />

based on their area which was measured with a tape<br />

measure and by measuring the length and width <strong>of</strong> each<br />

tide pool. The Anthopleura xanthogrammica (green<br />

sea anemone), Mytilus californianus (California<br />

mussel), Pagurus samuelis (blue banded hermit crab),<br />

and Tegula funebralis (black turban snail) were all<br />

tallied at each tide pool and recorded in our lab<br />

notebook. These organisms were selected because they<br />

were present at both locations and we were looking to<br />

compare if pollution was beginning to affect the<br />

abundance <strong>of</strong> these marine organisms. The data was<br />

then transferred to Micros<strong>of</strong>t Excel. The density <strong>of</strong><br />

each organism in each tide pool was calculated by the<br />

ratio <strong>of</strong> the number <strong>of</strong> individuals <strong>of</strong> a species to the<br />

total area it inhabited. Using the density calculations<br />

the relative density was calculated by the ratio <strong>of</strong> the<br />

density <strong>of</strong> a species to the total densities <strong>of</strong> all species<br />

multiplied by one hundred. The relative densities <strong>of</strong><br />

each organism at each location were graphed on a bar<br />

graph using Micros<strong>of</strong>t Excel. An unpaired two-tailed t-<br />

test was ran on the data and showed that there was no<br />

significant difference between the relative densities <strong>of</strong><br />

all the organisms at both locations (p=0.99±S.E.M.).<br />

Results<br />

The mean relative densities <strong>of</strong> each organism<br />

at both locations were graphed using a bar graph on<br />

Micros<strong>of</strong>t Excel (figure 1). An unpaired two-tailed t-<br />

test was ran on the data and results showed that there is<br />

no significant difference between the mean relative<br />

densities <strong>of</strong> the green sea anemones, California<br />

mussels, black turban snails, or blue banded hermit<br />

crabs. A statistical analysis was also run on the data in<br />

order to calculate the standard error means.<br />

136<br />

<strong>Saddleback</strong> <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Biology</strong><br />

Spring 2010

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!