Saddleback Journal of Biology - Saddleback College
Saddleback Journal of Biology - Saddleback College
Saddleback Journal of Biology - Saddleback College
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Spring 2010 <strong>Biology</strong> 3B Paper<br />
Figure 2. Day zero, five, seven, a comparison <strong>of</strong> mean estimated bacterial count (CFU/mL) between beef<br />
soup test tubes containing 0.1 mL Salmonella, 0.1 mL garlic solution with 0.1mL Salmonella, 1.0mL garlic<br />
solution with 0.1mL Salmonella, and 10.0 mL garlic solution with 0.1mL Salmonella. Error bars indicate<br />
standard error.<br />
Day zero’s mean estimated bacterial count<br />
for beef soup test tube containing 0.1 mL Salmonella<br />
was 10,438,271,550 ± 794,533,710.4 CFU/mL (n=5,<br />
Mean ± S.E.M.). Mean estimated bacterial count for<br />
beef soup test tube containing 0.1 mL garlic solution<br />
with 0.1 mL Salmonella was 3,996,336,488 ±<br />
312,731,818.2 CFU/mL (n=5, Mean ± S.E.M.). Mean<br />
estimated bacterial count for beef soup test tube<br />
containing 1.0 mL garlic solution with 0.1 mL<br />
Salmonella was 419,523,300 ± 62,306,189.52<br />
CFU/mL (n=5, Mean ± S.E.M.). Mean estimated<br />
bacterial count for beef soup test tube containing 10.0<br />
mL garlic solution with 0.1 mL Salmonella was<br />
24,430 ± 9,964.033445 CFU/mL (n=5, Mean ±<br />
S.E.M.). ANOVA (p=0.0001) and bonferroni post<br />
test indicated that there were significant differences<br />
between each beef soup test tube group.<br />
Day five’s mean estimated bacterial count<br />
for beef soup test tube containing 0.1 mL Salmonella<br />
was 12,011,781,600 ± 1,311,965,380 CFU/mL (n=5,<br />
Mean ± S.E.M.). Mean estimated bacterial count for<br />
beef soup test tube containing 0.1 mL garlic solution<br />
with 0.1 mL Salmonella was 3,218,362,875 ±<br />
307,489,403.8 CFU/mL (n=5, Mean ± S.E.M.). Mean<br />
estimated bacterial count for beef soup test tube<br />
containing 1.0 mL garlic solution with 0.1 mL<br />
Salmonella was 138,418,875 ± 32,379,901.34<br />
CFU/mL (n=5, Mean ± S.E.M.). Mean estimated<br />
bacterial count for beef soup test tube containing 10.0<br />
mL garlic solution with 0.1 mL Salmonella was 210<br />
± 169.668795 CFU/mL (n=5, Mean ± S.E.M.).<br />
ANOVA (p=0.0001) and bonferroni post test<br />
indicated that there were significant differences<br />
between each beef soup test tube group.<br />
Day seven’s mean estimated bacterial count<br />
for beef soup test tube containing 0.1 mL Salmonella<br />
was 13,767,518,363 ± 431,414,168.2 CFU/mL (n=5,<br />
Mean ± S.E.M.). Mean estimated bacterial count for<br />
beef soup test tube containing 0.1 mL garlic solution<br />
with 0.1 mL Salmonella was 3,128,117,738 ±<br />
477,471,563.5 CFU/mL (n=5, Mean ± S.E.M.). Mean<br />
estimated bacterial count for beef soup test tube<br />
containing 1.0 mL garlic solution with 0.1 mL<br />
Salmonella was 108,552,150 ± 10,014,661.33<br />
CFU/mL (n=5, Mean ± S.E.M.). Mean estimated<br />
bacterial count for beef soup test tube containing 10.0<br />
mL garlic solution with 0.1 mL Salmonella was 0 ± 0<br />
CFU/mL (n=5, Mean ± S.E.M.). ANOVA (p=0.0001)<br />
and bonferroni post test indicated that there were<br />
significant differences between each beef soup test<br />
tube group.<br />
ANOVA (p=0.073) indicated that there were<br />
no significant differences between each day <strong>of</strong><br />
26<br />
<strong>Saddleback</strong> <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Biology</strong><br />
Spring 2010