23.02.2014 Views

Saddleback Journal of Biology - Saddleback College

Saddleback Journal of Biology - Saddleback College

Saddleback Journal of Biology - Saddleback College

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Spring 2010 <strong>Biology</strong> 3B Paper<br />

Figure 2. Day zero, five, seven, a comparison <strong>of</strong> mean estimated bacterial count (CFU/mL) between beef<br />

soup test tubes containing 0.1 mL Salmonella, 0.1 mL garlic solution with 0.1mL Salmonella, 1.0mL garlic<br />

solution with 0.1mL Salmonella, and 10.0 mL garlic solution with 0.1mL Salmonella. Error bars indicate<br />

standard error.<br />

Day zero’s mean estimated bacterial count<br />

for beef soup test tube containing 0.1 mL Salmonella<br />

was 10,438,271,550 ± 794,533,710.4 CFU/mL (n=5,<br />

Mean ± S.E.M.). Mean estimated bacterial count for<br />

beef soup test tube containing 0.1 mL garlic solution<br />

with 0.1 mL Salmonella was 3,996,336,488 ±<br />

312,731,818.2 CFU/mL (n=5, Mean ± S.E.M.). Mean<br />

estimated bacterial count for beef soup test tube<br />

containing 1.0 mL garlic solution with 0.1 mL<br />

Salmonella was 419,523,300 ± 62,306,189.52<br />

CFU/mL (n=5, Mean ± S.E.M.). Mean estimated<br />

bacterial count for beef soup test tube containing 10.0<br />

mL garlic solution with 0.1 mL Salmonella was<br />

24,430 ± 9,964.033445 CFU/mL (n=5, Mean ±<br />

S.E.M.). ANOVA (p=0.0001) and bonferroni post<br />

test indicated that there were significant differences<br />

between each beef soup test tube group.<br />

Day five’s mean estimated bacterial count<br />

for beef soup test tube containing 0.1 mL Salmonella<br />

was 12,011,781,600 ± 1,311,965,380 CFU/mL (n=5,<br />

Mean ± S.E.M.). Mean estimated bacterial count for<br />

beef soup test tube containing 0.1 mL garlic solution<br />

with 0.1 mL Salmonella was 3,218,362,875 ±<br />

307,489,403.8 CFU/mL (n=5, Mean ± S.E.M.). Mean<br />

estimated bacterial count for beef soup test tube<br />

containing 1.0 mL garlic solution with 0.1 mL<br />

Salmonella was 138,418,875 ± 32,379,901.34<br />

CFU/mL (n=5, Mean ± S.E.M.). Mean estimated<br />

bacterial count for beef soup test tube containing 10.0<br />

mL garlic solution with 0.1 mL Salmonella was 210<br />

± 169.668795 CFU/mL (n=5, Mean ± S.E.M.).<br />

ANOVA (p=0.0001) and bonferroni post test<br />

indicated that there were significant differences<br />

between each beef soup test tube group.<br />

Day seven’s mean estimated bacterial count<br />

for beef soup test tube containing 0.1 mL Salmonella<br />

was 13,767,518,363 ± 431,414,168.2 CFU/mL (n=5,<br />

Mean ± S.E.M.). Mean estimated bacterial count for<br />

beef soup test tube containing 0.1 mL garlic solution<br />

with 0.1 mL Salmonella was 3,128,117,738 ±<br />

477,471,563.5 CFU/mL (n=5, Mean ± S.E.M.). Mean<br />

estimated bacterial count for beef soup test tube<br />

containing 1.0 mL garlic solution with 0.1 mL<br />

Salmonella was 108,552,150 ± 10,014,661.33<br />

CFU/mL (n=5, Mean ± S.E.M.). Mean estimated<br />

bacterial count for beef soup test tube containing 10.0<br />

mL garlic solution with 0.1 mL Salmonella was 0 ± 0<br />

CFU/mL (n=5, Mean ± S.E.M.). ANOVA (p=0.0001)<br />

and bonferroni post test indicated that there were<br />

significant differences between each beef soup test<br />

tube group.<br />

ANOVA (p=0.073) indicated that there were<br />

no significant differences between each day <strong>of</strong><br />

26<br />

<strong>Saddleback</strong> <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Biology</strong><br />

Spring 2010

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!