23.02.2014 Views

Saddleback Journal of Biology - Saddleback College

Saddleback Journal of Biology - Saddleback College

Saddleback Journal of Biology - Saddleback College

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Fall 2009 <strong>Biology</strong> 3B Paper<br />

Introduction<br />

The adaptive properties <strong>of</strong> fish allow them to<br />

metabolize optimally at a certain temperature range.<br />

Tilapia is native to 20-30°, and salmon inhabit areas<br />

that range in temperatures from 0-15°, according Irons<br />

III and Oswood (1991). It is logical that the warm<br />

water adapted fish metabolize better in high<br />

temperature water than a cold adapted fish would. The<br />

body temperature <strong>of</strong> fish remains close to that <strong>of</strong> the<br />

water they reside in and their capability to adapt to<br />

marginal thermal change makes fish excellent<br />

ectothermic organisms in which to examine<br />

temperature responses (Guderley, 2004). Since tilapia<br />

has a higher temperature tolerance, its metabolism is<br />

able to function at high temperatures and not bodily<br />

over-heat them; the higher the temperature set point,<br />

the greater the endurance <strong>of</strong> high-rate aerobic activity<br />

at high ambient temperatures (Heinrich 1977).<br />

When distinguishing a fish as being either<br />

warm or cold water adapted, the fish are labeled by the<br />

temperature ranges that they metabolize optimally at.<br />

Tilapia resides in tropical waters where as salmon<br />

reside in arctic to temperate winter waters and as such<br />

the fish’s internal body temperature have adapted to<br />

account from their habits.<br />

Enzymes act primarily as catalysts, or as<br />

controlling or regulatory elements within an organism.<br />

Enzymes need to be able to fluxuate in order to initiate<br />

changes during strategic positions in metabolism. If<br />

enzymes were non-adaptive, the organism would die<br />

due to its inability to metabolize or regulate itself when<br />

a change in the body system occurs (Hochachka and<br />

Somero, 1984). Succinc Acid is an enzyme that is<br />

required in the Citric Acid Cycle for aerobic<br />

metabolism to occur. By using this enzyme, a<br />

metabolic reaction is triggered within the samples,<br />

which in term allows them to undergo aerobic<br />

metabolic activity after death. As SDH triggers the<br />

intermediate to change from succinate to fumarate<br />

releasing FADH 2 which intern is used for oxygen<br />

reduction. When that oxygen reduction occurs, a<br />

reaction with the methylene blue changes it to its<br />

colorless form showing the metabolic progression <strong>of</strong><br />

the sample.<br />

Our objective was to determine if warm water<br />

adaptive fish metabolize better that cold adaptive fish<br />

in an incubator set to 37 o using succinic acid and<br />

methylene blue as indicators <strong>of</strong> aerobic metabolism. I<br />

hypothesized that the there would be a significant<br />

difference in the rate it took for oxidation-reduction to<br />

change the methylene blue to its colorless form within<br />

the samples.<br />

Materials and Method<br />

Five samples <strong>of</strong> tilapia and five samples <strong>of</strong><br />

salmon were used in this study. The salmon was<br />

obtained from Jon’s Fish market, Dana Point California<br />

on 20, 21, 22 nd <strong>of</strong> November 2009, and the tilapia was<br />

purchased from Vons, Laguna Niguel California on the<br />

22 nd <strong>of</strong> November 2009. All measurements were made<br />

on 22 nd <strong>of</strong> November 2009. The samples were chopped<br />

into pieces and weighted out to ten grams (g). The<br />

samples were then frozen at -80 oC each wrapped in<br />

both plastic and foil individually and labeled. Ten g <strong>of</strong><br />

each sample was thawed out to room temperature; each<br />

sample was homogenized together with 25 mL <strong>of</strong><br />

sodium phosphate solution individually; The sodium<br />

phosphate (Solution C) is comprised <strong>of</strong> [306 mL<br />

sodium phosphate monohydrate (Solution A) (NaH 2 Po 4<br />

+H 2 O; 31.73 g to 1000 mL) + 255 mL <strong>of</strong> Sodium<br />

phosphate Dibasic (Solution B) (NaHPo4 + H2O; 53.6<br />

g to 1000 mL) + 600 mL <strong>of</strong> Deionized Water (DI)]; the<br />

sodium phosphate solution acts as the buffer for this<br />

experiment. Ten mL <strong>of</strong> the each homogenized sample<br />

were placed in labeled test tubes and placed back into<br />

the freezer set at -20 oc . the samples were thawed as five<br />

water baths were set to specific temperatures (0 o , 7 o ,<br />

15 o , 22 o , 30 o ). Three drops <strong>of</strong> methylene blue was<br />

added to each sample followed by .5 mL <strong>of</strong> succinic<br />

acid (59g/500mL x 10 mL Solution C, a total <strong>of</strong> 1.18g<br />

<strong>of</strong> succinic acid was added to 10 mL <strong>of</strong> Solution C and<br />

heated until dissolved).<br />

A glass rod was used to mix the samples until<br />

the methylene blue fully permeated the samples. The<br />

two test tubes, one <strong>of</strong> each fish species, were placed in<br />

each <strong>of</strong> the water bathes. The samples were<br />

continuously checked on at fifteen-minute intervals<br />

until visible signs <strong>of</strong> oxidation in the samples were<br />

noticed. Then the samples were checked every five<br />

minutes until the half the samples were clear. The<br />

oxidation reduction that is under gone during aerobic<br />

metabolism and how quickly it is being done is what is<br />

being measured when the speed in which it took for<br />

each sample to reduce the entire methylene blue within<br />

sample to its colorless form is recorded. All data was<br />

transferred to MS Excel (Micros<strong>of</strong>t Corporation,<br />

Redmond, Washington) where all further statistical<br />

manipulations were performed.<br />

Results<br />

The average combined times <strong>of</strong> warm-water<br />

adapted tilapia in this study was 37.2 ± 5.7 minutes.<br />

The average combined times <strong>of</strong> cold-water adapted<br />

salmon in this study was 69.8 ± 8.7 minutes. A twotailed<br />

unpaired t-test revealed that the mean combined<br />

times <strong>of</strong> the two fish were not significantly different<br />

(p=0.165212546).<br />

148<br />

<strong>Saddleback</strong> <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Biology</strong><br />

Spring 2010

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!