Saddleback Journal of Biology - Saddleback College
Saddleback Journal of Biology - Saddleback College
Saddleback Journal of Biology - Saddleback College
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Fall 2009 <strong>Biology</strong> 3B Paper<br />
Introduction<br />
The adaptive properties <strong>of</strong> fish allow them to<br />
metabolize optimally at a certain temperature range.<br />
Tilapia is native to 20-30°, and salmon inhabit areas<br />
that range in temperatures from 0-15°, according Irons<br />
III and Oswood (1991). It is logical that the warm<br />
water adapted fish metabolize better in high<br />
temperature water than a cold adapted fish would. The<br />
body temperature <strong>of</strong> fish remains close to that <strong>of</strong> the<br />
water they reside in and their capability to adapt to<br />
marginal thermal change makes fish excellent<br />
ectothermic organisms in which to examine<br />
temperature responses (Guderley, 2004). Since tilapia<br />
has a higher temperature tolerance, its metabolism is<br />
able to function at high temperatures and not bodily<br />
over-heat them; the higher the temperature set point,<br />
the greater the endurance <strong>of</strong> high-rate aerobic activity<br />
at high ambient temperatures (Heinrich 1977).<br />
When distinguishing a fish as being either<br />
warm or cold water adapted, the fish are labeled by the<br />
temperature ranges that they metabolize optimally at.<br />
Tilapia resides in tropical waters where as salmon<br />
reside in arctic to temperate winter waters and as such<br />
the fish’s internal body temperature have adapted to<br />
account from their habits.<br />
Enzymes act primarily as catalysts, or as<br />
controlling or regulatory elements within an organism.<br />
Enzymes need to be able to fluxuate in order to initiate<br />
changes during strategic positions in metabolism. If<br />
enzymes were non-adaptive, the organism would die<br />
due to its inability to metabolize or regulate itself when<br />
a change in the body system occurs (Hochachka and<br />
Somero, 1984). Succinc Acid is an enzyme that is<br />
required in the Citric Acid Cycle for aerobic<br />
metabolism to occur. By using this enzyme, a<br />
metabolic reaction is triggered within the samples,<br />
which in term allows them to undergo aerobic<br />
metabolic activity after death. As SDH triggers the<br />
intermediate to change from succinate to fumarate<br />
releasing FADH 2 which intern is used for oxygen<br />
reduction. When that oxygen reduction occurs, a<br />
reaction with the methylene blue changes it to its<br />
colorless form showing the metabolic progression <strong>of</strong><br />
the sample.<br />
Our objective was to determine if warm water<br />
adaptive fish metabolize better that cold adaptive fish<br />
in an incubator set to 37 o using succinic acid and<br />
methylene blue as indicators <strong>of</strong> aerobic metabolism. I<br />
hypothesized that the there would be a significant<br />
difference in the rate it took for oxidation-reduction to<br />
change the methylene blue to its colorless form within<br />
the samples.<br />
Materials and Method<br />
Five samples <strong>of</strong> tilapia and five samples <strong>of</strong><br />
salmon were used in this study. The salmon was<br />
obtained from Jon’s Fish market, Dana Point California<br />
on 20, 21, 22 nd <strong>of</strong> November 2009, and the tilapia was<br />
purchased from Vons, Laguna Niguel California on the<br />
22 nd <strong>of</strong> November 2009. All measurements were made<br />
on 22 nd <strong>of</strong> November 2009. The samples were chopped<br />
into pieces and weighted out to ten grams (g). The<br />
samples were then frozen at -80 oC each wrapped in<br />
both plastic and foil individually and labeled. Ten g <strong>of</strong><br />
each sample was thawed out to room temperature; each<br />
sample was homogenized together with 25 mL <strong>of</strong><br />
sodium phosphate solution individually; The sodium<br />
phosphate (Solution C) is comprised <strong>of</strong> [306 mL<br />
sodium phosphate monohydrate (Solution A) (NaH 2 Po 4<br />
+H 2 O; 31.73 g to 1000 mL) + 255 mL <strong>of</strong> Sodium<br />
phosphate Dibasic (Solution B) (NaHPo4 + H2O; 53.6<br />
g to 1000 mL) + 600 mL <strong>of</strong> Deionized Water (DI)]; the<br />
sodium phosphate solution acts as the buffer for this<br />
experiment. Ten mL <strong>of</strong> the each homogenized sample<br />
were placed in labeled test tubes and placed back into<br />
the freezer set at -20 oc . the samples were thawed as five<br />
water baths were set to specific temperatures (0 o , 7 o ,<br />
15 o , 22 o , 30 o ). Three drops <strong>of</strong> methylene blue was<br />
added to each sample followed by .5 mL <strong>of</strong> succinic<br />
acid (59g/500mL x 10 mL Solution C, a total <strong>of</strong> 1.18g<br />
<strong>of</strong> succinic acid was added to 10 mL <strong>of</strong> Solution C and<br />
heated until dissolved).<br />
A glass rod was used to mix the samples until<br />
the methylene blue fully permeated the samples. The<br />
two test tubes, one <strong>of</strong> each fish species, were placed in<br />
each <strong>of</strong> the water bathes. The samples were<br />
continuously checked on at fifteen-minute intervals<br />
until visible signs <strong>of</strong> oxidation in the samples were<br />
noticed. Then the samples were checked every five<br />
minutes until the half the samples were clear. The<br />
oxidation reduction that is under gone during aerobic<br />
metabolism and how quickly it is being done is what is<br />
being measured when the speed in which it took for<br />
each sample to reduce the entire methylene blue within<br />
sample to its colorless form is recorded. All data was<br />
transferred to MS Excel (Micros<strong>of</strong>t Corporation,<br />
Redmond, Washington) where all further statistical<br />
manipulations were performed.<br />
Results<br />
The average combined times <strong>of</strong> warm-water<br />
adapted tilapia in this study was 37.2 ± 5.7 minutes.<br />
The average combined times <strong>of</strong> cold-water adapted<br />
salmon in this study was 69.8 ± 8.7 minutes. A twotailed<br />
unpaired t-test revealed that the mean combined<br />
times <strong>of</strong> the two fish were not significantly different<br />
(p=0.165212546).<br />
148<br />
<strong>Saddleback</strong> <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Biology</strong><br />
Spring 2010