23.02.2014 Views

Saddleback Journal of Biology - Saddleback College

Saddleback Journal of Biology - Saddleback College

Saddleback Journal of Biology - Saddleback College

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Fall 2009 <strong>Biology</strong> 3B Paper<br />

are applied too lavishly. Some <strong>of</strong> these chemicals are<br />

biodegradable and quickly decay into harmless or less<br />

harmful forms, while others are non-biodegradable and<br />

remain dangerous for a long time.<br />

When animals consume plants that have been<br />

treated with certain non-biodegradable chemicals, such<br />

as chlordane and dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane<br />

(DDT), these chemicals are absorbed into the tissues or<br />

organs <strong>of</strong> the animals. When other animals ingest the<br />

contaminated animals, the chemicals are passed up the<br />

food chain. The concentration <strong>of</strong> the pollutant<br />

accumulates at each succeeding level <strong>of</strong> the food web.<br />

This process is called biomagnification or<br />

bioaccumulation (Hart 2008).<br />

What seems to be the most talked about health<br />

threat today is a pathogen that is water borne and also<br />

lies within several <strong>of</strong> our food items known as E. coli.<br />

E. coli, is a common type <strong>of</strong> bacteria that can get into<br />

foods such as beef and vegetables. If the water that<br />

people or animals and plants are exposed to contains<br />

any human waste, it can carry the E. coli bacteria.<br />

Someone who has E. coli infection may have these<br />

symptoms: bad stomach cramps and belly pain,<br />

vomiting, diarrhea, sometimes with blood in it. One<br />

strain <strong>of</strong> E. coli was found in fresh spinach in 2006 and<br />

some fast-food hamburgers in 1993 (Nichols 2008).<br />

Beef can contain E. coli because the bacteria <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

infect cattle. It can be in meat that comes from cattle<br />

and it's also in their feces. This can occur if the manure<br />

is used for fertilizer (a common practice to help crops<br />

grow) or if water contaminated with E. coli is used to<br />

irrigate the crops.<br />

Investigators decided to test the water quality<br />

at the popular beach in Southern California named<br />

Doheny State Beach. A total <strong>of</strong> thirty sample bottles <strong>of</strong><br />

water were collected from the coast. Ten were<br />

collected from 100 meters south <strong>of</strong> Salt Creek, which<br />

runs directly into the ocean water at the beach, then ten<br />

more were taken from the direct line <strong>of</strong> the creek to the<br />

ocean, and another ten were taken from 100 meters<br />

north <strong>of</strong> the creek. Investigators hypothesized that there<br />

would be a great difference in fomenters and gas<br />

producers between the locations <strong>of</strong> the samples taken.<br />

E. coli, which is found in large numbers in the feces <strong>of</strong><br />

all animals, lives longer in water than most intestinal<br />

pathogens do. Therefore, if no E. coli are present, there<br />

should be no intestinal pathogens present in the water<br />

sample. This is why testing for coliform organisms are<br />

performed as a daily ritual by water departments and<br />

waste-water (sewage) treatment plants. It is regularly<br />

tested for in coastal sea water samples, as well as<br />

run<strong>of</strong>f water. The first bacterial test is a screening test<br />

to sample water for the presence <strong>of</strong> coliform<br />

organisms. A series <strong>of</strong> lactose fermentation tubes are<br />

inoculated with the water sample. If the presumptive<br />

test is negative, no further testing is performed, and the<br />

water source is considered microbiologically safe. If,<br />

however, any tube in the series shows acid and gas, the<br />

water is considered unsafe and the confirmed test is<br />

performed on the tube displaying a positive reaction.<br />

The presumptive test is also designed to estimate the<br />

concentration <strong>of</strong> coliform organisms, called the most<br />

probably number (MPN) in the water sample.<br />

Materials & Methods<br />

Thirty water samples were collected on the<br />

night <strong>of</strong> October 25 th , 2009 at 9:30 pm during high tide<br />

at Doheny State Beach. Ten sample bottles were filled<br />

at 100 meters South and North <strong>of</strong> the San Juan Creek<br />

as well as another ten collected in the direct line from<br />

the creek to the ocean. Each bottle was then labeled<br />

with the sample number and location. Ten milliliters <strong>of</strong><br />

every sample was placed into three, triple strength<br />

lactose tubes, 1 ml <strong>of</strong> each sample into three regular<br />

strength lactose tubes, and 0.1 ml in three more regular<br />

strength lactose tubes. Each tube was then labeled<br />

using a grease pencil to note the number <strong>of</strong> the sample,<br />

the amount <strong>of</strong> sample water included, as well as<br />

whether it was triple or single strength lactose. The<br />

tubes were incubated at about 40̊ C for twenty-four<br />

hours. After the incubation period, investigators were<br />

then able to record the results. The presence <strong>of</strong> gas or<br />

acids in the tubes after the incubation period indicates<br />

the presence <strong>of</strong> coliform bacteria in the sample. A layer<br />

<strong>of</strong> bubbles atop the sample would indicate that the<br />

water sample held bacteria that formed gasses. If the<br />

sample held any fermenters, the water sample in the<br />

incubated tube would turn from green to a distinct<br />

yellow color. The most probable number (MPN) was<br />

then calculated in order to determine the concentration<br />

<strong>of</strong> coliform organisms at each location.<br />

Results<br />

Water samples were collected from a midpoint<br />

at Doheny State Beach, and from one-hundred meters<br />

north <strong>of</strong> that point, and one-hundred meters south. The<br />

MPN was calculated from each <strong>of</strong> the test tubes, and<br />

the mean MPN was calculated for each location. The<br />

North mean MPN was 1018; Middle mean MPN was<br />

1124; South mean MPN was 591.2. A single-factor<br />

ANOVA test was conducted to compare the means.<br />

The ANOVA is appropriate because it compares more<br />

than two means at once and yields one p-value for the<br />

means, collectively. There was no difference; a<br />

Bonferroni Correction will not be needed.<br />

133<br />

<strong>Saddleback</strong> <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Biology</strong><br />

Spring 2010

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!