23.02.2014 Views

Saddleback Journal of Biology - Saddleback College

Saddleback Journal of Biology - Saddleback College

Saddleback Journal of Biology - Saddleback College

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Spring 2010 <strong>Biology</strong> 3B Paper<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> pH on vinegar eel (Turbatrix aceti)<br />

Sophia Iribarren<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Biological Sciences<br />

<strong>Saddleback</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />

Mission Viejo, California 92692<br />

Turbatrix aceti can tolerate a pH range <strong>of</strong> 1.6 to 11 for various periods <strong>of</strong> time. The<br />

objective <strong>of</strong> this experiment was to test the forward velocity as the pH on the external<br />

medium <strong>of</strong> T.aceti was changed. The forward velocity was expected to decrease in more<br />

basic and acidic mediums compared to the control group. T.aceti nematodes were placed in<br />

six 30 ml beakers with <strong>of</strong> solutions at pH <strong>of</strong> two, four, six, eight, and ten. To determine the<br />

forward velocity ten vinegar eels were timed with a stop watch and distance traveled was<br />

measured through the microscope for each solution. Based on the results obtained, pH did<br />

affect the locomotion <strong>of</strong> T.aceti in the five experimental groups in comparison to the control<br />

group. The mean V F for pH 2 was 10.7 ± 1.43 mm · s -1 (±SEM, N=10), for pH 3 was 16.8 ±<br />

5.61 mm · s -1 (±SEM, N=10), for pH 4 was 11.0 ± 2.36 mm· s -1 (±SEM, N=10), pH 6 was 9.24<br />

± 1.98 mm · s -1 (±SEM, N=10), pH 8 was 9.23 ± 1.66 mm · s -1 (±SEM, N=10), and for pH 10<br />

was 4.84 ± 2.70 mm · s -1 (±SEM, N=10).These results indicate that pH does affect the<br />

locomotion <strong>of</strong> T .aceti (p=0.001). One reason for this may be that their naturally<br />

functioning enzymes and ions involved in locomotion do not function well with pH change.<br />

Introduction<br />

The vinegar eel (Turbatrix aceti) is free<br />

living nematode that has been fascinating to many<br />

naturalists. They are a few millimeters in length and<br />

are barely visible to the naked eye. In 1765 Linnaeus<br />

included the Vinegar eel in his Systema Naturae and<br />

named it Chaos redivivum (Peters, 1928). During the<br />

18 th century there was a controversy on the name<br />

given by Linnaeus; he had given the same name to<br />

the worms found in vinegar and the worms found in<br />

book binder’s paste. This issue remained unresolved<br />

until DeMann published a paper on vinegar eels in<br />

1910. The vinegar eel received its new name<br />

Turbatrix aceti (MacGowan, 1982).<br />

T. aceti tolerates a pH range <strong>of</strong> 1.6 to 11 for<br />

various periods <strong>of</strong> time and grows in a pH ranging<br />

from 3.5 to 9 (Goodey, 1963). The eelworm can be<br />

recognized by its lack <strong>of</strong> circular muscles and by its<br />

rapid lateral lashing movement (Galen, 1971). They<br />

move by muscle contraction producing wave like<br />

functions and undulations (Gray, 1939).Vinegar eels<br />

are sinusoidal swimmers (Drewes et. al, 2002).<br />

Nematodes can sense variations in their external<br />

surroundings and respond to them. Muscles <strong>of</strong> the<br />

body wall are controlled by inhibitory and excitatory<br />

neuromuscular synapses (Alexander, 2002).<br />

The objective <strong>of</strong> this experiment was to test<br />

the forward velocity as the pH in the medium <strong>of</strong><br />

T.aceti was changed. The purpose is to understand<br />

the movement <strong>of</strong> the muscles and how locomotion is<br />

affected by changes in the concentration <strong>of</strong> H + ions.<br />

In this study the forward velocity <strong>of</strong> T. aceti is<br />

expected to decrease in more basic and acidic<br />

mediums compared to the control group.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

Vinegar eels used in this experiment were<br />

obtained from Wards Biological Society in San Luis<br />

Obispo, CA. Randomly chosen T. aceti were placed<br />

in six 30 ml beakers with solutions at pH <strong>of</strong> two,<br />

four, six, eight, and ten. The solutions were made<br />

using 1M sodium hydroxide, 0.01M sodium<br />

hydroxide, 1M hydrochloric acid, and 0.01 M<br />

hydrochloric acid. A solution with a pH <strong>of</strong> three was<br />

used as the control group since the optimum pH level<br />

<strong>of</strong> T.aceti is three (Ells et al., 1961). The vinegar eels<br />

were allowed to get acclimated to the different pH<br />

levels for 24 hours at room temperature.<br />

After the acclimation period, a sample <strong>of</strong><br />

vinegar eels was placed under the E2000 microscope<br />

at low power (4x). Ten vinegar eels were timed with<br />

a stop watch and the distance traveled was measured<br />

through the microscope for each solution. The head<br />

<strong>of</strong> the vinegar eel was used as the start and finish<br />

reference point. By determining the traveled distance<br />

and time elapsed, the forward velocity was<br />

determined.<br />

45<br />

<strong>Saddleback</strong> <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Biology</strong><br />

Spring 2010

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!