Saddleback Journal of Biology - Saddleback College
Saddleback Journal of Biology - Saddleback College
Saddleback Journal of Biology - Saddleback College
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Spring 2010 <strong>Biology</strong> 3B Paper<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> pH on vinegar eel (Turbatrix aceti)<br />
Sophia Iribarren<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Biological Sciences<br />
<strong>Saddleback</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />
Mission Viejo, California 92692<br />
Turbatrix aceti can tolerate a pH range <strong>of</strong> 1.6 to 11 for various periods <strong>of</strong> time. The<br />
objective <strong>of</strong> this experiment was to test the forward velocity as the pH on the external<br />
medium <strong>of</strong> T.aceti was changed. The forward velocity was expected to decrease in more<br />
basic and acidic mediums compared to the control group. T.aceti nematodes were placed in<br />
six 30 ml beakers with <strong>of</strong> solutions at pH <strong>of</strong> two, four, six, eight, and ten. To determine the<br />
forward velocity ten vinegar eels were timed with a stop watch and distance traveled was<br />
measured through the microscope for each solution. Based on the results obtained, pH did<br />
affect the locomotion <strong>of</strong> T.aceti in the five experimental groups in comparison to the control<br />
group. The mean V F for pH 2 was 10.7 ± 1.43 mm · s -1 (±SEM, N=10), for pH 3 was 16.8 ±<br />
5.61 mm · s -1 (±SEM, N=10), for pH 4 was 11.0 ± 2.36 mm· s -1 (±SEM, N=10), pH 6 was 9.24<br />
± 1.98 mm · s -1 (±SEM, N=10), pH 8 was 9.23 ± 1.66 mm · s -1 (±SEM, N=10), and for pH 10<br />
was 4.84 ± 2.70 mm · s -1 (±SEM, N=10).These results indicate that pH does affect the<br />
locomotion <strong>of</strong> T .aceti (p=0.001). One reason for this may be that their naturally<br />
functioning enzymes and ions involved in locomotion do not function well with pH change.<br />
Introduction<br />
The vinegar eel (Turbatrix aceti) is free<br />
living nematode that has been fascinating to many<br />
naturalists. They are a few millimeters in length and<br />
are barely visible to the naked eye. In 1765 Linnaeus<br />
included the Vinegar eel in his Systema Naturae and<br />
named it Chaos redivivum (Peters, 1928). During the<br />
18 th century there was a controversy on the name<br />
given by Linnaeus; he had given the same name to<br />
the worms found in vinegar and the worms found in<br />
book binder’s paste. This issue remained unresolved<br />
until DeMann published a paper on vinegar eels in<br />
1910. The vinegar eel received its new name<br />
Turbatrix aceti (MacGowan, 1982).<br />
T. aceti tolerates a pH range <strong>of</strong> 1.6 to 11 for<br />
various periods <strong>of</strong> time and grows in a pH ranging<br />
from 3.5 to 9 (Goodey, 1963). The eelworm can be<br />
recognized by its lack <strong>of</strong> circular muscles and by its<br />
rapid lateral lashing movement (Galen, 1971). They<br />
move by muscle contraction producing wave like<br />
functions and undulations (Gray, 1939).Vinegar eels<br />
are sinusoidal swimmers (Drewes et. al, 2002).<br />
Nematodes can sense variations in their external<br />
surroundings and respond to them. Muscles <strong>of</strong> the<br />
body wall are controlled by inhibitory and excitatory<br />
neuromuscular synapses (Alexander, 2002).<br />
The objective <strong>of</strong> this experiment was to test<br />
the forward velocity as the pH in the medium <strong>of</strong><br />
T.aceti was changed. The purpose is to understand<br />
the movement <strong>of</strong> the muscles and how locomotion is<br />
affected by changes in the concentration <strong>of</strong> H + ions.<br />
In this study the forward velocity <strong>of</strong> T. aceti is<br />
expected to decrease in more basic and acidic<br />
mediums compared to the control group.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
Vinegar eels used in this experiment were<br />
obtained from Wards Biological Society in San Luis<br />
Obispo, CA. Randomly chosen T. aceti were placed<br />
in six 30 ml beakers with solutions at pH <strong>of</strong> two,<br />
four, six, eight, and ten. The solutions were made<br />
using 1M sodium hydroxide, 0.01M sodium<br />
hydroxide, 1M hydrochloric acid, and 0.01 M<br />
hydrochloric acid. A solution with a pH <strong>of</strong> three was<br />
used as the control group since the optimum pH level<br />
<strong>of</strong> T.aceti is three (Ells et al., 1961). The vinegar eels<br />
were allowed to get acclimated to the different pH<br />
levels for 24 hours at room temperature.<br />
After the acclimation period, a sample <strong>of</strong><br />
vinegar eels was placed under the E2000 microscope<br />
at low power (4x). Ten vinegar eels were timed with<br />
a stop watch and the distance traveled was measured<br />
through the microscope for each solution. The head<br />
<strong>of</strong> the vinegar eel was used as the start and finish<br />
reference point. By determining the traveled distance<br />
and time elapsed, the forward velocity was<br />
determined.<br />
45<br />
<strong>Saddleback</strong> <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Biology</strong><br />
Spring 2010