23.02.2014 Views

Saddleback Journal of Biology - Saddleback College

Saddleback Journal of Biology - Saddleback College

Saddleback Journal of Biology - Saddleback College

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Fall 2009 <strong>Biology</strong> 3A Abstracts<br />

6. INTRASPECIFIC VARIATION IN RESISTANCE AND ADAPTATION TO<br />

DESICCATION AND CLIMATIC GRADIENTS IN THE PACIFIC BANANA SLUG<br />

(Ariolimax columbianus). Kyle Crawford and Chris Medina, Department <strong>of</strong> Biological Sciences,<br />

<strong>Saddleback</strong> <strong>College</strong>, Mission Viejo, CA, 92692, USA<br />

Pacific banana slugs, Ariolimax dolichophallus, <strong>of</strong> California are subject to desiccating<br />

conditions in their terrestrial habitats depending on seasonal weather patterns. A slug risks a<br />

significant loss <strong>of</strong> body mass when placed in desiccating environments due to high relative body<br />

water content and osmosis permeable skin. It was tested that banana slugs are prone to become<br />

more resistant to dehydration after several periods <strong>of</strong> exposure to desiccating environments. The<br />

experiment was performed on banana slugs in four controlled humidities including a control<br />

group in order to determine the amount <strong>of</strong> water loss and the ability to adapt to each environment<br />

over a period <strong>of</strong> three trials. The results supported the hypothesis that by the third dehydration<br />

the slugs retained more water and were less susceptible to desiccation. After the third trial the<br />

slugs retained 92.5% (± se, N = 4) <strong>of</strong> their original body mass in a 0% relative humid<br />

environment, retaining 12.5% more than the first desiccation, 91.2% (± se, N = 4) in a 33%<br />

relative humid environment retaining 4.5% more than the first desiccation, and 91.6% (± se, N =<br />

4) in a 75% relative humid environment retaining 4.8% more than the first desiccation. Three<br />

independent ANOVA’s indicated a significant difference between the first and final desiccation<br />

in each environment, (p = 4.71 × 10 -6 , p = 8.73 × 10 -4 , and p = 7.04 × 10 -3 ).<br />

7. CRUDE ONION (Allium cepa) JUICE SHOWS NO SIGNIFICANT ANTIBACTERIAL<br />

EFFECT ON Escherichia coli AND Staphylococcus aureus. Daria Cubberley and Arshan<br />

Ferdowsian. Department <strong>of</strong> Biological Sciences, <strong>Saddleback</strong> <strong>College</strong>, Mission Viejo, CA, 92692,<br />

USA<br />

Since many researchers found that some plants possess antibacterial substances, this study<br />

investigated the effect <strong>of</strong> onion (Allium cepa) juice on the growth <strong>of</strong> a strain <strong>of</strong> gram-negative<br />

bacteria, Escherichia coli, and a strain <strong>of</strong> gram-positive bacteria, Staphylococcus aureus. As<br />

gram-negative bacteria have the outer membrane which makes them more resistant to antibiotics,<br />

it was predicted that the antibacterial effect <strong>of</strong> crude onion juice would be significantly greater<br />

on S. aureus than on E. coli. The experiment was performed using aseptic technique. The broth<br />

cultures <strong>of</strong> bacteria were spread on the surface <strong>of</strong> the agar. Four sterile filter paper disks 6.0 mm<br />

in diameter were dipped into onion juice and placed equidistant from each other on each <strong>of</strong> the<br />

10 Petri dishes with E. coli and on each <strong>of</strong> the 10 Petri dishes with S. aureus. The controls were<br />

prepared in the same manner by dipping filter paper disks into sterile deionized water and<br />

placing them on the agar. After incubating the Petri dishes for 72 hours in 37 °C, the diameters<br />

<strong>of</strong> the zones <strong>of</strong> inhibition were measured. The results did not support either <strong>of</strong> the hypotheses.<br />

161<br />

<strong>Saddleback</strong> <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Biology</strong><br />

Spring 2010

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!