23.02.2014 Views

Saddleback Journal of Biology - Saddleback College

Saddleback Journal of Biology - Saddleback College

Saddleback Journal of Biology - Saddleback College

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Fall 2009 <strong>Biology</strong> 3B Paper<br />

the participants’ blood was retested in the same manner<br />

and the results were then recorded in the lab notebook.<br />

After the first portion <strong>of</strong> the study, the<br />

participants waited for five minutes before beginning<br />

the treadmill portion. During this portion the<br />

participants jogged for fifteen minutes on the treadmill,<br />

at a speed <strong>of</strong> 7.1 kilometers per hour. Subjects then<br />

waited for five minutes before their glucose levels were<br />

retested. The participants then took a different memory<br />

test with the same format, and studying time. After the<br />

participants wrote down as many numbers as they<br />

could recall, their blood glucose levels were retested<br />

and recorded.<br />

Results<br />

Memory Tests<br />

The average amount <strong>of</strong> number sets recalled<br />

after exercise was significantly greater than the initial<br />

test prior to exercise. The average number sets<br />

remembered in the initial test prior to exercise was 4.6<br />

± 0.476 (±SEM, n=10). The average sets recalled after<br />

exercise was 7.3 ± 1.27 (±SEM, n=10). A one tailed,<br />

paired t-test revealed that the number <strong>of</strong> sets<br />

remembered after exercise is significantly greater than<br />

without exercise (p=0.003) (Figure 1).<br />

Blood Glucose Levels<br />

The blood glucose levels did not change<br />

significantly throughout the testing period. The average<br />

blood glucose level before the initial memory test was<br />

86.6 ± 3.1 mg/dL (±SEM, n=10), and the level after the<br />

initial memory test and before exercise was 89 ± 3.7<br />

mg/dL (±SEM, n=10). The average blood glucose level<br />

after exercise and before the second memory test was<br />

95.8 ± 6.1 mg/dL (±SEM, n=10). The average level<br />

after the second memory test was 86.6 ± 4.1 mg/dL<br />

(±SEM, n=10). An ANOVA test revealed that there<br />

was no significance in the differences between the<br />

glucose levels (p=0.417) (Figure 2).<br />

Average Number Sets Remembered<br />

10<br />

9<br />

8<br />

7<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

Memory Test 1 Before Exercise<br />

Memory Test 2 After Exercise<br />

Figure 1: The average number <strong>of</strong> sets recalled after exercise were 58.6 percent greater than before exercise. A one<br />

tailed, paired t-test revealed that the number <strong>of</strong> sets recalled after exercise was significantly greater than without<br />

exercise (p=0.003).<br />

124<br />

<strong>Saddleback</strong> <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Biology</strong><br />

Spring 2010

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!