Saddleback Journal of Biology - Saddleback College
Saddleback Journal of Biology - Saddleback College
Saddleback Journal of Biology - Saddleback College
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Spring 2010 <strong>Biology</strong> 3B Paper<br />
The forward velocity (V F ) <strong>of</strong> the vinegar eel was<br />
measured using the following formula:<br />
change in distance(mm·s-1)<br />
VF =<br />
change in time(s)<br />
This same procedure was repeated with all <strong>of</strong> the six<br />
solutions.<br />
Results<br />
Sixty vinegar eels were used in this<br />
experiment. Results indicate (Figure 1) that the<br />
average forward velocity <strong>of</strong> T.aceti after acclimated<br />
in the five different pH solutions was significantly<br />
different (ANOVA, p= 0.001). The control group<br />
demonstrated a significantly higher V F on average<br />
than the experimental groups. As the pH <strong>of</strong> the<br />
solution was increased or decreased, the average V F<br />
<strong>of</strong> T.aceti lowered over the measured period. The<br />
mean V F for pH 2 was 10.7 ± 1.43 mm · s -1 (±SEM,<br />
N=10), for pH 3 was 16.8 ± 5.61 mm · s -1 (±SEM,<br />
N=10), for pH 4 was 11.0 ± 2.36 mm· s -1 (±SEM,<br />
N=10), pH 6 was 9.24 ± 1.98 mm · s -1 (±SEM,<br />
N=10), pH 8 was 9.23 ± 1.66 mm · s -1 (±SEM,<br />
N=10), and for pH 10 was 4.84 ± 2.70 mm · s -1<br />
(±SEM, N=10). A Bonferroni correction was run and<br />
the results showed significance between pH: 2 and 3,<br />
2 and 10, 3 and 4, 3 and 6, 3 and 8, 3 and 10, and 4<br />
and 10.<br />
16<br />
Forward velocity (mm · s -1 )<br />
14<br />
12<br />
10<br />
8<br />
6<br />
4<br />
2<br />
0<br />
0 2 4 6 8 10 12<br />
pH<br />
Figure 1. Average forward velocity (mm·s -1 ) <strong>of</strong> T.aceti after being acclimated in different pH. ANOVA showed a<br />
significant difference (p=0.001).<br />
Discussion<br />
T. aceti locomotion was affected with the<br />
change in pH. The effect on locomotion was shown<br />
by the decrease <strong>of</strong> the forward velocity. T. aceti, in<br />
more acidic and basic medium was not able to<br />
maintain the same velocity when compared to the<br />
control group. This confirms that the vinegar eel’s<br />
optimum pH is three; however they also have the<br />
ability to tolerate abrupt pH changes ranging from<br />
three to ten.<br />
There may be some reasons why the V F <strong>of</strong><br />
T. aceti was affected. The naturally functioning<br />
enzymes and ions involved in locomotion do not<br />
function well with changes in pH. In nematodes<br />
locomotion depends on transmission forces generated<br />
by muscular contractions (Gaugler et al., 2004).<br />
Enzymes have an optimum pH at which their<br />
activity is maximal, as the pH increases or<br />
decreases the enzymatic activity can be altered<br />
leading to a change in other metabolic functions<br />
(Lehringer et al., 2005). Ion imbalance could<br />
have affected their locomotion. In acid-stressed<br />
fish populations an ionic imbalance is the<br />
physiological mechanism responsible for fish<br />
depletion (Jones, 1985).<br />
Another reason why the V F <strong>of</strong> T. aceti<br />
was affected could have been from the stress <strong>of</strong><br />
pH change. This stress could have altered their<br />
balance and coordination forcing them to swim<br />
at a slower speed. In studies done by Jones et<br />
al. (1985) fish that were placed in acidic<br />
mediums presented it difficult and strenuous to<br />
swim; normal activities such as eating were no<br />
longer a priority. Since a gradual pH acclimation<br />
46<br />
<strong>Saddleback</strong> <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Biology</strong><br />
Spring 2010