Saddleback Journal of Biology - Saddleback College
Saddleback Journal of Biology - Saddleback College
Saddleback Journal of Biology - Saddleback College
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Spring 2010 <strong>Biology</strong> 3B Paper<br />
Studies have found C. americanus to be<br />
morphologically capable <strong>of</strong> producing a significant<br />
variety <strong>of</strong> notes, many <strong>of</strong> which can be used for<br />
assembly or to warn other crows about nearby<br />
predators. Many speculate C. americanus posses its<br />
own language for communication, not implying that<br />
it has developed a system <strong>of</strong> conversation, but simply<br />
produces a few sounds by which it is able to convey<br />
different emotions and warning to its own specie. The<br />
pitches have a variety <strong>of</strong> meanings; a high pitch may<br />
be a call, an alarm or to attract a display <strong>of</strong> attention<br />
(Burns, 1901). Different qualities <strong>of</strong> caws are specific<br />
to the context: whining caws are given by young<br />
crows soliciting food; high pitched caws are given by<br />
crows on seeing a hawk overhead; low pitched<br />
growling caws are given by crows on close contact<br />
with a predator (Thompson, 1982).<br />
The use <strong>of</strong> recorded distress calls <strong>of</strong> corvids<br />
have been documented in the past. The distress calls<br />
that were made when a crow was captured by a<br />
predator were recorded and played back over a<br />
speaker system. Even though these studies have<br />
always been able to replicate a response specific to<br />
the call that was played back, there has always been a<br />
large discrepancy in the number <strong>of</strong> crows that<br />
respond in each trial. It has been speculated that<br />
external factors, such as weather or the position <strong>of</strong><br />
the sun can play a role in the number <strong>of</strong> responses.<br />
The main objective <strong>of</strong> this study was to<br />
replicate the assembly call <strong>of</strong> the C. americanus and<br />
to see if there was a difference in the number <strong>of</strong><br />
crows that responded to the calls in the morning vs.<br />
dusk. It was hypothesized that there would not be a<br />
significant difference in the number <strong>of</strong> responses.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
Prior to recording the assembly calls,<br />
observations were made on how the time <strong>of</strong> day and<br />
weather affected the crow’s behavior and activity. All<br />
the trials were executed on clear windless days. This<br />
was to ensure that wind did not affect the sound<br />
distribution. Crows have been known to project their<br />
assembly calls when they see one <strong>of</strong> their own caught<br />
by a predator. Lorenz reported that tame Jackdaws<br />
(Corvus monedula) attacked his hand when he carried<br />
a pair <strong>of</strong> black swimming trunks; he went on to<br />
suggest that "dangling black" releases an innate<br />
predator-attacking mechanism in these birds<br />
(Barash,1976). In the current study, a small black<br />
cloth was stuffed with packing material and was<br />
shaken in front <strong>of</strong> a nearby crow. The response was<br />
recorded using a Sony portable PCM linear recorder.<br />
The recorded audio file was modified to<br />
include just the desired call. The audio file was set on<br />
a two- minute loop with 10 seconds between each<br />
call. The recorded file was played for two- minutes<br />
for each trial Different species <strong>of</strong> birds respond to<br />
these calls in different ways but gulls and corvids in<br />
particular usually approach the source <strong>of</strong> the noise<br />
and flew overhead for some time before dispersing<br />
and completely deserting the area (Bremond et al,<br />
1968). If one or more crows showed positive<br />
phonotaxis, responded to the stimulus by flying on a<br />
direct path towards the source and continued by<br />
flying over head then the trial was recorded as<br />
successful. If one or more crows showed moderate<br />
phonotaxis, responded by flying directly toward the<br />
speaker but changed directions prior to reaching the<br />
source, the trial was also recorded as successful. If a<br />
response was not observed, then the trial was<br />
recorded as unsuccessful. The calls were used on<br />
different flocks <strong>of</strong> birds and were not played in the<br />
same location more than once every 2 days. This was<br />
to ensure that the crows did not get acclimated to the<br />
calls. Calls were played three times in three different<br />
locations during the morning after sunrise. The<br />
number <strong>of</strong> birds showing positive phonotaxis was<br />
recorded. The nine trials were also conducted at<br />
sunset, at the same locations as the morning trials in<br />
order to minimize any error.<br />
The calls were broadcasted by the audio system<br />
installed in a 1997 Lexus sedan. The stock stereo had<br />
been replaced with a Pioneer head unit, model # Fhp8000BT.<br />
Additional pioneer speaker (4x 270 watt)<br />
and a Pioneer GM-D8400DM, 1200 watt amplifier<br />
had been added. This was to ensure proper sound<br />
levels and frequencies. The vehicles sun ro<strong>of</strong> and<br />
windows were left open to ensure proper sound<br />
distribution. The procedure was to drive along the<br />
campus <strong>of</strong> <strong>Saddleback</strong> <strong>College</strong> on weekends until a<br />
good site for broadcast presented itself. A good site<br />
must have had crows present, been large enough to<br />
permit the observation <strong>of</strong> approaching birds and far<br />
enough from houses such that the recordings would<br />
not disturb the residents. Parking Lots 1, 5A, and 9<br />
were selected for research.<br />
Results<br />
Positive results were seen in both morning<br />
and afternoon, yet a greater number <strong>of</strong> crows<br />
responded during the sunset trials. A total <strong>of</strong> 45 trials<br />
were performed for each set. The number <strong>of</strong><br />
successful and unsuccessful trials is shown in Figure<br />
1. The numbers <strong>of</strong> successful trials were compared to<br />
the number <strong>of</strong> unsuccessful trials in the morning and<br />
afternoon in a contingency table. There were 7<br />
successful trials in the morning, versus 18 successful<br />
trials at dusk. The Chi-squared showed a statistically<br />
significant association between the morning and the<br />
afternoon trial (p=0.0088, Chi-squared 2x2 two-tailed<br />
contingency table).<br />
38<br />
<strong>Saddleback</strong> <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Biology</strong><br />
Spring 2010