23.02.2014 Views

Saddleback Journal of Biology - Saddleback College

Saddleback Journal of Biology - Saddleback College

Saddleback Journal of Biology - Saddleback College

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Spring 2010 <strong>Biology</strong> 3B Paper<br />

Studies have found C. americanus to be<br />

morphologically capable <strong>of</strong> producing a significant<br />

variety <strong>of</strong> notes, many <strong>of</strong> which can be used for<br />

assembly or to warn other crows about nearby<br />

predators. Many speculate C. americanus posses its<br />

own language for communication, not implying that<br />

it has developed a system <strong>of</strong> conversation, but simply<br />

produces a few sounds by which it is able to convey<br />

different emotions and warning to its own specie. The<br />

pitches have a variety <strong>of</strong> meanings; a high pitch may<br />

be a call, an alarm or to attract a display <strong>of</strong> attention<br />

(Burns, 1901). Different qualities <strong>of</strong> caws are specific<br />

to the context: whining caws are given by young<br />

crows soliciting food; high pitched caws are given by<br />

crows on seeing a hawk overhead; low pitched<br />

growling caws are given by crows on close contact<br />

with a predator (Thompson, 1982).<br />

The use <strong>of</strong> recorded distress calls <strong>of</strong> corvids<br />

have been documented in the past. The distress calls<br />

that were made when a crow was captured by a<br />

predator were recorded and played back over a<br />

speaker system. Even though these studies have<br />

always been able to replicate a response specific to<br />

the call that was played back, there has always been a<br />

large discrepancy in the number <strong>of</strong> crows that<br />

respond in each trial. It has been speculated that<br />

external factors, such as weather or the position <strong>of</strong><br />

the sun can play a role in the number <strong>of</strong> responses.<br />

The main objective <strong>of</strong> this study was to<br />

replicate the assembly call <strong>of</strong> the C. americanus and<br />

to see if there was a difference in the number <strong>of</strong><br />

crows that responded to the calls in the morning vs.<br />

dusk. It was hypothesized that there would not be a<br />

significant difference in the number <strong>of</strong> responses.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

Prior to recording the assembly calls,<br />

observations were made on how the time <strong>of</strong> day and<br />

weather affected the crow’s behavior and activity. All<br />

the trials were executed on clear windless days. This<br />

was to ensure that wind did not affect the sound<br />

distribution. Crows have been known to project their<br />

assembly calls when they see one <strong>of</strong> their own caught<br />

by a predator. Lorenz reported that tame Jackdaws<br />

(Corvus monedula) attacked his hand when he carried<br />

a pair <strong>of</strong> black swimming trunks; he went on to<br />

suggest that "dangling black" releases an innate<br />

predator-attacking mechanism in these birds<br />

(Barash,1976). In the current study, a small black<br />

cloth was stuffed with packing material and was<br />

shaken in front <strong>of</strong> a nearby crow. The response was<br />

recorded using a Sony portable PCM linear recorder.<br />

The recorded audio file was modified to<br />

include just the desired call. The audio file was set on<br />

a two- minute loop with 10 seconds between each<br />

call. The recorded file was played for two- minutes<br />

for each trial Different species <strong>of</strong> birds respond to<br />

these calls in different ways but gulls and corvids in<br />

particular usually approach the source <strong>of</strong> the noise<br />

and flew overhead for some time before dispersing<br />

and completely deserting the area (Bremond et al,<br />

1968). If one or more crows showed positive<br />

phonotaxis, responded to the stimulus by flying on a<br />

direct path towards the source and continued by<br />

flying over head then the trial was recorded as<br />

successful. If one or more crows showed moderate<br />

phonotaxis, responded by flying directly toward the<br />

speaker but changed directions prior to reaching the<br />

source, the trial was also recorded as successful. If a<br />

response was not observed, then the trial was<br />

recorded as unsuccessful. The calls were used on<br />

different flocks <strong>of</strong> birds and were not played in the<br />

same location more than once every 2 days. This was<br />

to ensure that the crows did not get acclimated to the<br />

calls. Calls were played three times in three different<br />

locations during the morning after sunrise. The<br />

number <strong>of</strong> birds showing positive phonotaxis was<br />

recorded. The nine trials were also conducted at<br />

sunset, at the same locations as the morning trials in<br />

order to minimize any error.<br />

The calls were broadcasted by the audio system<br />

installed in a 1997 Lexus sedan. The stock stereo had<br />

been replaced with a Pioneer head unit, model # Fhp8000BT.<br />

Additional pioneer speaker (4x 270 watt)<br />

and a Pioneer GM-D8400DM, 1200 watt amplifier<br />

had been added. This was to ensure proper sound<br />

levels and frequencies. The vehicles sun ro<strong>of</strong> and<br />

windows were left open to ensure proper sound<br />

distribution. The procedure was to drive along the<br />

campus <strong>of</strong> <strong>Saddleback</strong> <strong>College</strong> on weekends until a<br />

good site for broadcast presented itself. A good site<br />

must have had crows present, been large enough to<br />

permit the observation <strong>of</strong> approaching birds and far<br />

enough from houses such that the recordings would<br />

not disturb the residents. Parking Lots 1, 5A, and 9<br />

were selected for research.<br />

Results<br />

Positive results were seen in both morning<br />

and afternoon, yet a greater number <strong>of</strong> crows<br />

responded during the sunset trials. A total <strong>of</strong> 45 trials<br />

were performed for each set. The number <strong>of</strong><br />

successful and unsuccessful trials is shown in Figure<br />

1. The numbers <strong>of</strong> successful trials were compared to<br />

the number <strong>of</strong> unsuccessful trials in the morning and<br />

afternoon in a contingency table. There were 7<br />

successful trials in the morning, versus 18 successful<br />

trials at dusk. The Chi-squared showed a statistically<br />

significant association between the morning and the<br />

afternoon trial (p=0.0088, Chi-squared 2x2 two-tailed<br />

contingency table).<br />

38<br />

<strong>Saddleback</strong> <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Biology</strong><br />

Spring 2010

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!