02.03.2014 Views

Idaho National Laboratory Cultural Resource Management Plan

Idaho National Laboratory Cultural Resource Management Plan

Idaho National Laboratory Cultural Resource Management Plan

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

As the INL <strong>Cultural</strong> <strong>Resource</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Program has matured, initial focus on archaeology has<br />

expanded to include an emphasis on archaeological sites, buildings, artifacts, and archives associated with<br />

more recent INL history. As a result of the unique nature of the work conducted at INL, many buildings<br />

and structures are considered to be historically significant (Arrowrock Group 1997). With increasing<br />

emphasis on environmental restoration, there has been a corresponding increase in cultural resource<br />

reviews of actions affecting these resources (see Appendix D).<br />

In addition, stakeholder involvement became increasingly formalized in 1992 with the establishment<br />

of a working agreement between the Shoshone-Bannock Tribes and DOE-ID. This agreement has been<br />

superseded in successive years by new agreements-in-principle that continue to refine the working<br />

relationship between the Tribes and DOE-ID while promoting increased interaction, understanding, and<br />

cooperation on issues of mutual concern, such as protection of natural environment and cultural resources<br />

(see Appendix J). In the spirit of openness fostered by the agreements (c.f. DOE-ID 2007), and in<br />

recognition of the need to often facilitate communication from the ground up, the INL <strong>Cultural</strong> <strong>Resource</strong><br />

Working Group was established in 1992. Comprised of preservation professionals from the Shoshone-<br />

Bannock Tribes, DOE-ID, and the INL CRM Office, the group strives to reduce potential conflicts in the<br />

sensitive relationship between steward and stakeholder. The CRWG addresses diverse issues such as, but<br />

not limited to, traditional cultural places, sacred sites, cultural landscapes, human remains, and a variety<br />

of other resources that fall under the purview of the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation<br />

Act, NHPA, and ARPA.<br />

INL POLICIES FOR ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES<br />

DOE-ID and its contractors follow specific procedures to conduct research, environmental<br />

remediation, and operations at INL in a manner that protects human health and the environment in full<br />

compliance with environmental laws and regulations (see Appendix A). <strong>Cultural</strong> resources, including<br />

archaeological resources, are an expressed part of the protected environment. Protection is achieved<br />

through integration of environmental requirements into work planning and execution and consistent<br />

actions to minimize the environmental impacts of INL operations. This integrated approach applies to all<br />

INL employees and subcontractors who are also expected to report any environmental concerns to INL<br />

management. <strong>Management</strong>, in turn, is expected to take prompt action to address any concerns or issues.<br />

The INL environmental policy is implemented through internal standards and procedures as<br />

summarized in Appendix A. <strong>Cultural</strong> resource protection is an integral element in these procedural<br />

documents and is accomplished through a tailored review process that directly involves the INL CRM<br />

Office.<br />

The <strong>Cultural</strong> <strong>Resource</strong> Review Process<br />

INL is an active scientific and engineering laboratory. Thousands of work orders for projects ranging<br />

from lawn mowing to new facility construction are processed each year. Detailed procedures are in place<br />

to evaluate the environmental consequences of all activities, large or small.<br />

INL CRM Office review of proposed projects is prompted whenever one of the following basic<br />

thresholds is met:<br />

1. Ground disturbance outside the boundaries of fenced INL facility areas or more than 50 ft from<br />

existing buildings or landscaped areas in unfenced facility areas<br />

2. Demolition, major structural or landscape modification, or permanent closure of existing buildings or<br />

structures (see Appendix D)<br />

3. Any activities proposed for the EBR-I facility area, a <strong>National</strong> Historic Landmark (see Appendix D)<br />

133

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!