02.03.2014 Views

Idaho National Laboratory Cultural Resource Management Plan

Idaho National Laboratory Cultural Resource Management Plan

Idaho National Laboratory Cultural Resource Management Plan

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

inclusion in the INL cultural resource management project files (see Figure 31). These findings are also<br />

summarized and included in INL CRM Office yearly activity reports. After documentation is complete,<br />

the INL CRM Office provides written notification to the INL project manager with a recommendation<br />

that the project can proceed. Clearance recommendations such as this always carry a standard stipulation<br />

for stopping work if cultural materials (e.g., bones, obsidian flakes, “arrowheads” or other stone tools,<br />

darkened soil horizons, rusty cans, and ceramics) are unexpectedly encountered at any time.<br />

A similar set of procedures is followed when identification efforts reveal archaeological properties<br />

that are not eligible for the <strong>National</strong> Register within the area of potential effect for the project. This<br />

includes any of the following types of archaeological resources:<br />

<br />

Isolated finds<br />

Archaeological resources that have been previously determined through consultation with the <strong>Idaho</strong><br />

SHPO, Shoshone-Bannock Tribes, and other stakeholders and interested parties to be ineligible for<br />

nomination to the <strong>National</strong> Register or of no significance to the specified cultural group.<br />

These properties are considered to be ineligible for nomination to the <strong>National</strong> Register because they<br />

exhibit no potential to yield additional information (as determined by the original identification effort or<br />

some other type of previous archaeological investigation or consultation), setting has no bearing on their<br />

significance, and they are not deemed important by the appropriate tribal or stakeholder parties.<br />

Therefore, INL project activities will not significantly affect them, and they need not be avoided by<br />

project activities. Once documentation of the identification efforts and a justification of the no-effect<br />

finding are complete and permanently filed (see Figure 30), the INL CRM Office can recommend<br />

clearance for these projects through written correspondence with the INL project manager. Reminders of<br />

the INL Stop Work Authority and its applicability to unexpected discoveries of cultural material are also<br />

included with each of these clearance recommendations.<br />

Whenever possible, the INL CRM Office will endeavor to avoid impacts to all archaeological<br />

resources as a result of INL activities. This is particularly true when identification efforts (i.e. new survey,<br />

evaluation of resources recorded during a previous survey, and consultation) within a project's area of<br />

potential effect reveal archaeological resources that may be eligible for nomination to the <strong>National</strong><br />

Register or are significant to a local cultural group. The INL CRM Office takes a very conservative<br />

approach to significance evaluations in these, and all, situations. All archaeological sites are considered to<br />

be potentially significant until test excavations and/or consultation have been completed to assess their<br />

potential for yielding information of value in understanding research questions in history or prehistory<br />

(See Appendix E) and/or their importance to local cultural groups. Techniques employed to avoid damage<br />

to resources evaluated as potentially significant include, but are not necessarily limited to:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Physical relocation of project activities<br />

Establishment of minimal buffer zones (30 to 50 meters), depending on the situation, between the<br />

archaeological resource and the project activities<br />

Placement of fences or other permanent markers around the perimeters of archaeological resources to<br />

physically prevent unauthorized access or disturbance<br />

Placement of signs in the project area advising that destruction, alteration, or collection of historic and<br />

prehistoric archaeological materials is a federal crime<br />

Placement of protective fill or other coverings over the surface of archaeological resources to act as a<br />

physical buffer between the sensitive materials and the project activities<br />

Requirements for all project personnel to successfully complete cultural resource awareness training<br />

and specific project briefings provided through the INL CRM Office<br />

135

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!