02.03.2014 Views

Idaho National Laboratory Cultural Resource Management Plan

Idaho National Laboratory Cultural Resource Management Plan

Idaho National Laboratory Cultural Resource Management Plan

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

isk of releasing catastrophic amounts of radioactivity to the environment. The semiscale tests thus<br />

became part of the national debate over the safety of commercial nuclear power plants. 235<br />

Each LOFT experiment required time to construct and set up. The reactor vessel was installed on the<br />

MTA on November 6, 1972; the steam generator was set in place in December. In November 1973, the<br />

MTA moved into the LOFT containment vessel. During 1975, workers conducted functional testing of<br />

the LOFT systems. Non-nuclear large-break loss-of-coolant accidents (known as the L-1 series) took<br />

place from 1976 to 1978. At last, first LOFT nuclear experiment began at the end of 1978 and continued<br />

into 1979 and 1982 as the L-2 series of nuclear large-break loss-of-coolant accidents. 236<br />

The containment building was a new domed building. Its substantial 200-ton doors were ready to<br />

withstand the force arising from a flash to steam when coolant was withdrawn from the reactor core. To<br />

begin the first simulation in December 1978 scientists opened a valve to imitate a “large break” in the<br />

cooling pipe. It was over in thirty minutes. The scientists learned that water flowed into the reactor vessel<br />

faster than it was expelled in the crucial first seconds after the “break,” which kept the core cooler than<br />

they had expected.<br />

Before a second test could be arranged the following May, an accident at a commercial nuclear power<br />

plant at Three-Mile Island (TMI) in Pennsylvania caused a partial meltdown of the reactor core. LOFT<br />

scientists altered their work schedule and used their models (Semiscale) and computer programs to help<br />

determine how a potentially dangerous hydrogen bubble inside the TMI reactor could be dissipated.<br />

When the crisis was over, LOFT returned to its own test program, but as a result of TMI accelerated its<br />

study of “small breaks.” The TMI experience had demonstrated that these, combined with the<br />

inappropriate intervention of human operators, potentially could be as dangerous as larger coolant-flow<br />

breaks. 237<br />

In 1982 federal financing for the LOFT experiment ran out after thirty tests. An international<br />

consortium arranged to fund several more tests, including the last one in 1985, when scientists tried to<br />

simulate the TMI accident and melt the core. The test (numbered LP-FP-2) was performed with a<br />

specially insulated center fuel module that was the subject of the test. The main core was set up as a<br />

driver core, which created the desired experimental environment in a central fuel module. The center fuel<br />

module was the only portion of the core that simulated the “small-break” loss-of-coolant accident that<br />

occurred at TMI. The driver core of LOFT did not melt, nor did it experience conditions much different<br />

than normal operating conditions. The temperature rose to 4,000F, but the core did not melt. The safety<br />

system operated to flood the core and cool it off. After the analysis of this last experiment, the LOFT<br />

program ended in 1986. 238<br />

Significance of LOFT. The significance of the LOFT tests can hardly be overstated in the history of<br />

the nuclear power industry. A coincidence of historical timing linked the long-planned tests of reactor<br />

safety with the real-world accident at the TMI plant. The final LOFT tests validated the effectiveness of<br />

the safety systems that had been built into the TMI and other nuclear power plants.<br />

The buildings associated most importantly with LOFT are the containment building (TAN-650) and<br />

the aluminum building (originally made to protect the ANP reactors from the weather) recycled as an<br />

entry into the containment building (TAN-624). The LOFT building should be preserved in place as an<br />

exceptionally significant part of American nuclear history.<br />

235. U.S. Department of Energy, Human Radiation Experiments: The Department of Energy Roadmap to the Story and the Records<br />

(Washington, D.C.: Assistant Secretary to Environment, Safety and Health, February 1995), p. 96.<br />

236. LOFT Historical Brief.<br />

237. Bob Passaro, “TAN has Colorful, Secretive Past, to be mothballed by 2000,” Post Register, May 15, 1994, p. H-12. The damaged<br />

core and tons of other contaminated waste from TMI was sent to the Site for analysis and study.<br />

238. Stacy, Hangar HAER, p. 62.<br />

254

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!