02.03.2014 Views

Idaho National Laboratory Cultural Resource Management Plan

Idaho National Laboratory Cultural Resource Management Plan

Idaho National Laboratory Cultural Resource Management Plan

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Therefore, the addressable research questions are defined by the project parameters instead of by the<br />

research interest, as in academic research projects. This reversal of the ideal research approach (i.e.,<br />

question formulation, research design, and data recovery) results in a situation that is awkward to control.<br />

This is so because thousands of research questions could be posited for a project area, yet the discovered<br />

archaeological sites may address few, if any. The field archaeologist must be aware of all of these<br />

questions so that potentially significant sites can be recognized, but only those questions that directly<br />

apply to the observed resources are relevant and need to be developed during the analysis and reporting<br />

stages of the project.<br />

The remainder of this section presents research questions that are appropriate for the range of<br />

archeological sites known to exist on and around INL. The questions emerge from the overviews<br />

previously presented. It should be emphasized that a research design is more than a list of research<br />

questions; it must also outline the processes that lead to answers. One of the most difficult aspects of<br />

research design formulation is stating questions so that they can be answered. This often leads to<br />

questions that appear mundane and of little importance, yet they are crucial for addressing the broader<br />

objectives of archaeological research. In response to this, a hierarchical organization of questions and<br />

interests has been proposed (Fowler et al. 1981) as an appropriate organization for regional research<br />

designs. The organization has been successfully incorporated in several large-scale cultural resource<br />

surveys in the Desert West (e.g., Janetski 1981; Janetski and Holmer 1982). The approach organizes<br />

research objectives and questions according to the following outline:<br />

Problem Domains<br />

Research Topics<br />

Research Questions<br />

Data Requirements<br />

Several research topics might be presented under each domain, and several questions under each<br />

topic.<br />

Problem Domains<br />

Problem domains are general categories of research topics that embody all of the objectives of<br />

archaeological research: the who, what, where, when, and why of past cultures. The domains currently<br />

developed for INL are:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Chronology<br />

Settlement and subsistence<br />

<strong>Cultural</strong> relationships<br />

Demography<br />

Environment<br />

Technology<br />

Material culture data recovery techniques.<br />

There are undoubtedly others that can and will be added, but it is felt that most questions currently<br />

being asked of the archeological record in the upper Snake River Basin fall under one of the<br />

aforementioned domains.<br />

The problem domain of chronology subsumes questions that address when archaeologically defined<br />

cultures existed and how archaeologists recognize those cultures from their material remains. Settlement<br />

and subsistence subsumes questions about settlement patterns and economy, demography about<br />

177

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!