02.03.2014 Views

Idaho National Laboratory Cultural Resource Management Plan

Idaho National Laboratory Cultural Resource Management Plan

Idaho National Laboratory Cultural Resource Management Plan

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

BORAX-V, the final experiment in the BORAX series, operated from 1962 to 1964. Although<br />

BORAX-V was housed in the same reactor building as the earlier experiments, the structure and the<br />

reactor both were modified. The original reactor vessel was buried in place, covered with a deep layer of<br />

sand, and capped with concrete. A new reactor vessel was placed in a new addition to the reactor<br />

building.<br />

The purpose of BORAX-V was to demonstrate the feasibility of producing integral superheated steam<br />

in a reactor facility. “Integral” means that the boiling water and the superheated (“dry”) steam are<br />

produced in the same core. It was thought that superheated steam would prove more efficient and<br />

economical than a simple boiling water reactor system. BORAX-V went critical on February 9, 1962, and<br />

produced its first superheated steam on October 1963. During the course of experiments, BORAX-V<br />

tested the safety and effectiveness of superheated steam. The tests also examined safety problems related<br />

to damaged or corrupted fuel elements. At the end of a number of successful runs, BORAX-V was placed<br />

on standby in late 1964. 57<br />

The BORAX experiments helped persuade the AEC that the deliberate inducement of power<br />

excursions and the deliberate withdrawal of coolant to a reactor could be tested under controlled<br />

conditions without disaster. Many more followed BORAX. Such tests yielded valuable safety<br />

information, at a time when the modeling capability of computers was long into the future and could be<br />

acquired no other way. They established for the NRTS a unique and primary role in the development of<br />

safe nuclear power reactors. BORAX proved the principle enabling pressurized water reactors to be<br />

further developed. 58<br />

The Argonne-West Facility Grows: 1955–1965. In addition to the landmark event of BORAX-III<br />

lighting the town of Arco, the year 1955 also brought a milestone of another sort to Argonne’s <strong>Idaho</strong><br />

Division. 59 In November, EBR-I experienced an unintentional core meltdown—the first such accident in a<br />

nuclear reactor. Walter Zinn viewed the accident as a source of important information about fuel rod<br />

configuration and operating procedures, but the AEC’s failure to publicize the accident gave rise to<br />

questions about reactor safety and the credibility of the AEC. 60<br />

Nevertheless, Argonne expanded its facilities at the NRTS. A second breeder reactor, EBR-II, was<br />

proposed by Walter Zinn and approved by the AEC in 1954. Based on experimental results and operating<br />

experience with EBR-I, EBR-II would be an intermediate-sized reactor, capable of producing twenty<br />

megawatts of electricity. Design of EBR-II began in 1955 and construction began late in 1957.<br />

Zinn located the new complex at “Site 16,” on the eastern edge of the NRTS site, a location nearest to<br />

<strong>Idaho</strong> Falls. It soon was known as Argonne <strong>National</strong> <strong>Laboratory</strong>-West or ANL-W (now MFC). Argonne<br />

planned to operate EBR-II for several years and knew that there would be frequent visits from scientists<br />

based in Chicago. Time saved in driving to and from <strong>Idaho</strong> Falls, after flying in from Chicago, was the<br />

most important factor in the site selection. 61<br />

Although Argonne was poised to lead the nuclear industry in the development of breeder reactors,<br />

differences of opinion between AEC and Argonne somewhat stunted Argonne’s role in the development<br />

of major test reactors. In 1965, the AEC canceled Argonne’s Fast Reactor Test Facility that had been<br />

57. Rodman, p. 2; Loftness, Nuclear Power <strong>Plan</strong>ts, p. 217-218.<br />

58. Stacy, Proving the Principle, p. 132.<br />

59. The name “ANL-West” did not come into usage until later. According to Richard Lindsay, ANL-West Public Information<br />

officer, “<strong>Idaho</strong> Division” and “<strong>Idaho</strong> Branch Administration” were used to describe different activities, and the similarity of<br />

the names caused confusion. He believes that ANL-West was used unofficially to describe all of the operations and may<br />

have been made an official name when the headquarters lab was reorganized.<br />

60. Stacy, Proving the Principle, p. 135-136.<br />

61. Richard Lindsay, public information officer, ANL-West, Personal communication with Elizabeth Jacox, Sept. 2, 1997.<br />

214

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!