Idaho National Laboratory Cultural Resource Management Plan

More documents

Recommendations

Info

available information of value. The INL cultural resource management project files include a library of cultural resource investigations at and around INL and comprehensive databases and forms for cataloging cultural resources. Presently, the databases contain administrative, locational, and descriptive information and archaeological data that are tied to the geographical information system (GIS) in use at INL. Regular updates to the databases and GIS files ensure that records searches and ongoing survey efforts are based on the most current information. An electronic system integrates the cultural resource information into a single system that enhances the usefulness of the information; however, it does not replace the hardcopy cultural resource investigation records. These materials are stored in INL CRM Office project files. Duplicates of these hardcopies are also maintained to a large extent at the Idaho SHPO and, for archaeological sites, at the Earl H. Swanson Archaeological Repository in the Idaho Museum of Natural History, Pocatello, Idaho. Confidentiality. Archaeological records, such as those preserved within the INL CRM Office project files, are exempt from the Freedom of Information Act and are released on a strict need-to-know basis. At INL, this information is recognized as “controlled unclassified information” that can be distributed for “official use only.” The restrictions on distribution of archaeological site information are designed to protect these sensitive resources from looting and vandalism. Similar safeguards are also extended to all known American Indian cultural resources on INL. To meet the criteria for confidentiality established by law (ARPA, NHPA, American Indian Religious Freedom Act [AIRFA]) and by DOE directives regarding controlled unclassified information, the INL CRM Office limits the circulation of detailed maps and archaeological and important tribal site locational information. When not in use, this information is maintained in secure files in the INL CRM Office. When it is provided to INL project managers who need it for planning purposes, it is clearly labeled for “official use only.” Reports that are placed in public reading facilities as part of the NEPA review process are also carefully screened to remove all detail on archaeological and important American Indian resource locations. In contrast to archaeological and sensitive tribal resources, the locations of historic architectural properties are widely known by INL employees and the general public. However, following the events of September 11, 2001, some restrictions on the distribution of information were established in response to national security concerns. Curation. DOE is responsible for all artifacts and samples collected from INL and for their supporting documentation and must curate them in a repository that meets federal standards issued under 36 CFR 79, “Curation of Federally-Owned and Administered Archaeological Collections.” This is an ongoing responsibility as collection of artifacts and samples may occur under limited circumstances as part of the overall INL CRM Program. Those pre-1942 collections that have already been made are located at the Earl H. Swanson Archaeological Repository in the Idaho Museum of Natural History on the Idaho State University campus in Pocatello, Idaho, and are managed according to terms expressed in a curation contract between the repository and DOE-ID. Identification of post-1942 artifacts is conducted by a team comprised of INL CRM Office professionals, knowledgeable scientists and engineers, and others. Once identified, the artifacts are moved to interim storage. Identification of a long-term curation facility for post-1942 artifacts is ongoing. Permitting. Most cultural resource investigations at INL are conducted in-house through the INL CRM Office. Investigations by outside agencies, universities, or subcontractors are required to be permitted and are tracked and coordinated through the INL CRM Office where records are also maintained. Reuse. A culture of government properties reuse began at INL in 1949 with AEC’s acquisition of the World War II Naval Proving Ground and associated infrastructure, including architectural properties, for its reactor development and testing program. Although property reuse continues to be encouraged, the waning early nuclear mission, combined with increasing environmental concerns 42
eginning in the late 1960s, has resulted in mixed success for this endeavor. Reactor development and new construction at INL peaked in the late 1960s, and INL contractors began to seek external programs and customers to reuse existing INL architectural properties. A program known as “Work for Others” trained and encouraged employees to market INL staff and property capabilities to a wide variety of other government agencies and private businesses. As a result of this marketing effort, some INL employees worked on external programs for agencies such as the Department of Defense, and several INL structures were reused. For example, a large hangar located at TAN is now used by the U.S. Army for its Abrams tank armor project. In addition to active marketing efforts, a program was developed to identify “excess” INL architectural properties that were no longer needed and to screen those properties for reuse by all federal agencies. However, in addition to reuse, there also exists a need to clean up “legacy” waste left by past processes and, by the late 1980s, compliance with environmental laws and regulations became a growing concern. In the early 1990s, many of the “Work for Others” programs and customers were gone and DOE transferred INL landlord responsibilities, including the management of INL architectural properties, from reactor development to environmental remediation and, later, to environmental management (Stacy 2000 and personal communication with Ken Moor). The mission of the Environmental Management Program is to treat and/or remove INL hazardous, radiological, and mixed wastes and identify contaminated architectural properties for DD&D. Properties identified as contaminated include those that contained materials such as asbestos, petroleum products, acids and bases, radionuclides, unexploded ordnance and explosive residues (see Figure 25), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), and heavy metals (Arrowrock 2003). Although this meant that virtually all historic INL buildings and structures were slated for DD&D, internal and external opportunities for reusing them continue to be pursued. Figure 25. Unexploded Naval depth charge found at INL. In 2002, the Secretary of Energy designated INL as DOE’s lead laboratory for the development of the next generation of nuclear reactors and, at the same time, accelerated environmental cleanup. Landlord responsibilities shifted from environmental management to DOE’s Nuclear Energy Program and, in 2003, a transition team was formed to identify properties to transfer to the Nuclear Energy Program for continued use or reuse. This effort is ongoing and is intended to remain flexible as the new nuclear mission and necessary funding evolve and new customers and uses for some properties are identified, while the potential for reuse of other properties fades. Stakeholder Communication Both the NHPA (36 CFR 800.8) and NEPA, along with various executive orders and DOE policies, require stakeholder communication and systematic planning as keys to their successful implementation. Systematic planning for public participation in INL cultural resource management helps DOE ensure that such participation takes place in a productive manner. It further helps ensure that the public’s interests regarding cultural resource preservation and interpretation is considered as INL executes its primary missions. The list of stakeholders and potential stakeholders is as varied as the resources themselves, including such diverse groups as local historical societies, museum associations, Oregon Trail enthusiasts, INL retirees, historical and scientific researchers, American Indian tribes, and the general public. These diverse stakeholders are involved at appropriate levels and at appropriate 43
Page 3:
DOE/ID-10997 Revision 4 Idaho Natio
Page 7 and 8:
CONTENTS ABSTRACT .................
Page 9 and 10:
Appendix J—INL Cultural Resource
Page 11 and 12:
ACRONYMS, ABBREVIATIONS, AND SYMBOL
Page 13 and 14:
Co. company COM communication CP-1
Page 15 and 16:
FFA/CO FONSI FPR FRAN FS&R Federal
Page 17 and 18:
kV L LAK LAN LCCDA LCRE LDRD LESAT
Page 19 and 20:
NuPac Nuclear Pacific (manufacture
Page 21 and 22:
SM Stationary Medium Power reactor
Page 23 and 24:
W west WAG waste area group WCF Was
Page 25 and 26: GLOSSARY The terms defined in this
Page 27 and 28: compliance. Adherence to specific p
Page 29 and 30: historic context. An organizing str
Page 31 and 32: multi-component. A descriptive term
Page 33 and 34: econnaissance survey. A field surve
Page 35 and 36: Idaho National Laboratory Cultural
Page 37 and 38: elevant federal regulations, DOE-ID
Page 39 and 40: programs nationwide. As such, all I
Page 41: organization, agency, museum, or ot
Page 44 and 45: Figure 3. Regional setting of Idaho
Page 46 and 47: extruded from low-shield volcanoes,
Page 48 and 49: The relatively permanent water sour
Page 50 and 51: Gradually, as a result of this pale
Page 52 and 53: fauna, including now-extinct forms
Page 54 and 55: Figure 11. Elko corner-notched dart
Page 56 and 57: The absence of a restrictive sociop
Page 58 and 59: Figure 13. Big Lost River during se
Page 60 and 61: In the 1890s another way station or
Page 62 and 63: History: 1942 to Present In 1942, t
Page 64 and 65: south of MTR at ATRC. At the time o
Page 66 and 67: The Loss of Fluid Test (LOFT) progr
Page 68 and 69: Figure 24. Aerial view of MFC. Othe
Page 70 and 71: Responsibility for Resource Managem
Page 72 and 73: and sacred American Indian sites sc
Page 74 and 75: to the broad patterns of our histor
Page 78 and 79: times, including during an annual m
Page 80 and 81: INL CRM Office staff have also deve
Page 82 and 83: Figure 27. National Historic Preser
Page 84 and 85: encountered during any activity. Ac
Page 86 and 87: 2. No Adverse Effect. Cultural reso
Page 88 and 89: egular commentary on INL CRM Office
Page 90 and 91: Bonnichsen, B. and R. M. Breckenrid
Page 92 and 93: Executive Order 13287, 2003, “Pre
Page 94 and 95: Kurten, B. and E. Anderson, 1972,
Page 96 and 97: Pierce, K. L. and W. E. Scott, 1982
Page 98 and 99: Stacy, S., 2005a, Historic American
Page 101: Appendix A Legal Basis for Cultural
Page 104 and 105: “Federal Records Act of 1950,”
Page 106 and 107: * “National Environmental Policy
Page 108 and 109: “Preserve America,” 2003 (EO 13
Page 110 and 111: DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY DIRECTIVES Cul
Page 112 and 113: Figure 28. INL Environmental Policy
Page 114 and 115: Figure 30. Bechtel BWXT Environment
Page 116 and 117: *LWP-8000, “Environmental Instruc
Page 119 and 120: Appendix B American Indian Interest
Page 121 and 122: 3. Consultation. DOE and the Tribes
Page 123: Between the Shoshone-Bannock Tribes
Page 127 and 128:
BACKGROUND U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERG
Page 129 and 130:
III. THE DEPARTMENT WILL ESTABLISH
Page 131:
Attachment 2 Agreement-in-Principle
Page 135 and 136:
101
Page 137 and 138:
103
Page 139 and 140:
105
Page 141 and 142:
107
Page 143 and 144:
109
Page 145 and 146:
111
Page 147 and 148:
113
Page 149 and 150:
Attachment 3 Communications Protoco
Page 151 and 152:
Communications Protocol August 10,
Page 153 and 154:
undertaking. The intent of this not
Page 155 and 156:
D. Revision of Procedures These pro
Page 157 and 158:
Attachment 4 Memorandum of Agreemen
Page 159 and 160:
125
Page 161 and 162:
127
Page 163 and 164:
Appendix C Standards and Procedures
Page 165 and 166:
Appendix C Standards and Procedures
Page 167 and 168:
As the INL Cultural Resource Manage
Page 169 and 170:
inclusion in the INL cultural resou
Page 171 and 172:
SHPO, and other involved parties. I
Page 173 and 174:
esource base and enhance long-term
Page 175 and 176:
of any given test excavation will d
Page 177 and 178:
discussed under test excavations. A
Page 179 and 180:
e eligible to the National Register
Page 181 and 182:
Idaho National Laboratory Cultural
Page 183 and 184:
Figure 33. INL CRM Office permit ap
Page 185 and 186:
Figure 35. Intermountain Antiquitie
Page 187 and 188:
Figure 35. (continued.) 153
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Appendix D Strategies and Procedure
Page 195 and 196:
Appendix D Strategies and Procedure
Page 197 and 198:
uildings have been demolished (e.g.
Page 199 and 200:
POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR MANAGIN
Page 201 and 202:
In addition to internal procedures,
Page 203 and 204:
Council consultation, additional ti
Page 205 and 206:
Determination of eligibility 35-mm
Page 207 and 208:
Appendix E Research Designs 173
Page 209 and 210:
Appendix E Research Designs INTRODU
Page 211 and 212:
Therefore, the addressable research
Page 213 and 214:
INL Research Design Each of the pro
Page 215 and 216:
within the last 600 to 1000 years i
Page 217 and 218:
originate and where most processing
Page 219 and 220:
Site taxonomy is based on the amoun
Page 221 and 222:
of the limited number of sites exca
Page 223 and 224:
Research Topic: Historic Indian Occ
Page 225 and 226:
However, artifacts that often have
Page 227 and 228:
Research Question—Does the dramat
Page 229 and 230:
stages of stone tool manufacture ar
Page 231 and 232:
Appendix F Historic Contexts 197
Page 233 and 234:
Appendix F Historic Contexts INTROD
Page 235 and 236:
The Pocatello Naval Ordnance Plant.
Page 237 and 238:
constructed) a rocket ordnance test
Page 239 and 240:
In the Residential Area, the civili
Page 241 and 242:
occurrence of such episodes, how to
Page 243 and 244:
1952. These structures were — and
Page 245 and 246:
scarce resource. Only uranium could
Page 247 and 248:
highway could observe the steam and
Page 249 and 250:
approved in 1962. To the dismay of
Page 251 and 252:
supplied the NRTS as well. Argonne-
Page 253 and 254:
after further testing. When a speci
Page 255 and 256:
months or years of radiation exposu
Page 257 and 258:
The MTR auxiliary buildings were or
Page 259 and 260:
The MTR played a role in most of th
Page 261 and 262:
Because the reactor would operate a
Page 263 and 264:
working area, the Advanced Test Rea
Page 265 and 266:
partners in the safe operation and
Page 267 and 268:
DD&D of the OMRE. The facility then
Page 269 and 270:
and Drydock Company would develop t
Page 271 and 272:
Initially, the Navy sent about thre
Page 273 and 274:
The Army, therefore, set out to exp
Page 275 and 276:
gas-driven turbo-generator. It reac
Page 277 and 278:
$6-7 million; for diesel, $350,000.
Page 279 and 280:
The ANP support facilities were con
Page 281 and 282:
Related to the SNAP program, the AE
Page 283 and 284:
The SPERT experiments took place at
Page 285 and 286:
vessel and control rod drive could
Page 287 and 288:
The PBF reactor achieved its first
Page 289 and 290:
Sub-Theme: Commercial Reactor Safet
Page 291 and 292:
uranium was not a hazard, but the I
Page 293 and 294:
North of the Waste Treatment Comple
Page 295 and 296:
pneumatic transport techniques. Phi
Page 297 and 298:
enriched fuels, aluminum-clad fuels
Page 299 and 300:
uildings, and craft shops. Then the
Page 301 and 302:
of building the reactor. Although t
Page 303 and 304:
DOE is actively seeking new custome
Page 305 and 306:
The three prototypes are presently
Page 307 and 308:
ICPP complex. Changes in waste mana
Page 309 and 310:
came to a halt, unfinished and sudd
Page 311 and 312:
As the Cold War escalated, the numb
Page 313 and 314:
e 3 × 10 11 curies, with an estima
Page 315 and 316:
also became concerned about Rocky F
Page 317 and 318:
Some of the cleanup involved moving
Page 319 and 320:
cleanup, and remediation of nuclear
Page 321 and 322:
Appendix G Programmatic Agreement 2
Page 323 and 324:
289
Page 325 and 326:
291
Page 327 and 328:
293
Page 329 and 330:
Appendix H Inventory of Known INL A
Page 331 and 332:
Appendix H Inventory of Known INL A
Page 333 and 334:
Table 5. (continued). INL Prehistor
Page 335 and 336:
Page 337 and 338:
Page 339 and 340:
Page 341 and 342:
Page 343 and 344:
Page 345 and 346:
Page 347 and 348:
Page 349 and 350:
Page 351 and 352:
Page 353 and 354:
Page 355 and 356:
Page 357 and 358:
Page 359 and 360:
Page 361 and 362:
Page 363 and 364:
Page 365 and 366:
Table 6. INL prehistoric isolated f
Page 367 and 368:
Page 369 and 370:
Page 371 and 372:
Page 373 and 374:
Page 375 and 376:
Page 377 and 378:
Page 379 and 380:
Page 381 and 382:
Page 383 and 384:
Page 385 and 386:
Page 387 and 388:
Page 389 and 390:
Page 391 and 392:
Page 393 and 394:
Page 395 and 396:
Page 397 and 398:
Page 399 and 400:
Table 7. INL historic and multi-com
Page 401 and 402:
Table 7. (continued). INL Historic
Page 403 and 404:
Page 405 and 406:
Page 407 and 408:
Appendix I INL Architectural Proper
Page 409 and 410:
Appendix I INL Architectural Proper
Page 411 and 412:
Table 8. Surveyed INL properties. B
Page 413 and 414:
Table 8. (continued). Building or S
Page 415 and 416:
Page 417 and 418:
Page 419 and 420:
Page 421 and 422:
Page 423 and 424:
Page 425 and 426:
Page 427 and 428:
Page 429 and 430:
Page 431 and 432:
Page 433 and 434:
Page 435 and 436:
Page 437 and 438:
Page 439 and 440:
Page 441 and 442:
Appendix J INL Cultural Resource Pr
Page 443 and 444:
Appendix J INL Cultural Resource Pr
Page 445 and 446:
Table 9. (continued). INL Cultural
Page 447 and 448:
Table 9. (continued). Project Numbe
Page 449 and 450:
Page 451 and 452:
Page 453 and 454:
Page 455 and 456:
Page 457 and 458:
Page 459 and 460:
Page 461 and 462:
Page 463 and 464:
Page 465 and 466:
Page 467 and 468:
Page 469 and 470:
Table 10. (continued). INL CRM Offi
Page 471 and 472:
Table 10. (continued). INL CRM Offi
Page 473 and 474:
Table 11. INL Cultural Resource Man
Page 475 and 476:
Table 11. (continued). Project Numb
Page 477 and 478:
Page 479 and 480:
Page 481 and 482:
Page 483 and 484:
Page 485 and 486:
Page 487 and 488:
Appendix K Goals and Tasks 453
Page 489 and 490:
Appendix K Goals and Tasks INTRODUC
Page 491 and 492:
Task 2. Maintain memberships in pro
Page 493 and 494:
Appendix L Idaho National Laborator
Page 495 and 496:
Appendix L Idaho National Laborator
Page 497:
Figure 38. Example of INL Cultural
show all

Idaho National Laboratory Cultural Resource Management Plan

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?