Idaho National Laboratory Cultural Resource Management Plan

More documents

Recommendations

Info

encountered during any activity. Activities exempt from cultural resource review at INL are listed in Table 2. Exemption lists are subject to stakeholder review along with other aspects of the overall CRM Program. Despite the exemptions for certain activities and property types, the INL CRM Office conducts a large number of cultural resource reviews each year. Most of these reviews are prompted by one of the threshold criteria listed in the previous description. However, some reviews are associated with exempt activities and resources, particularly those that involve archaeological resources that are ineligible for nomination to the National Register or Isolated Finds. Appendix J provides a list of the cultural resource reviews conducted over the past three decades. Cultural Resource Review Process INL NEPA compliance personnel or project managers initiate the cultural resource review process as early as possible in the planning phase of a project. Typically, they begin during the preparation of an environmental checklist, which provides the INL CRM Office with information on the nature and extent of the proposed activity. Exact dimensions and locations for all aspects of the proposed work (e.g., access roads, laydown areas, utility upgrade or removal, and proposed replacement or refinishing products) must be provided. INL CRM Office staff members use this information to determine if the proposed activity is an “undertaking” as defined in the NHPA and if so, to establish its “area of potential effect.” The next review process steps for INL CRM Office staff are to determine whether the area in question has ever been surveyed for cultural resources, and if so, whether the survey met the minimum requirements described in Appendices C and D, whether there are any previously identified cultural resources in the proposed project area, and if the affected property is listed on an existing inventory. Other sources of information that may be utilized include early land survey records, county land ownership records, local libraries and information repositories, current and former employees, local historians, and researchers who previously conducted investigations at INL. If these literature and records reviews indicate that the proposed project area and/or affected historic resource type is unsurveyed, has only been partially surveyed, was originally surveyed using methods less stringent than those described in Appendices C and D and in use today, or was completed more than 10 years ago, INL project, program, and facility managers must provide support for completion of a cultural resource survey, evaluation, and, when necessary, mitigation. Early planning is crucial for timely completion of this work and implementation of the proposed project. There are three possible outcomes at the end of the previously described scoping and identification efforts of the cultural resource review process. In broad outline, they are similar to those listed in the guidelines for implementation of Section 106 of the NHPA. This is intentional; they have been developed for compliance with this law. However, at INL there are resources (e.g., traditional American Indian gathering sites or sacred areas) that are not necessarily eligible for listing on the National Register. Although these resources may not be eligible, DOE-ID is obligated to consider them under requirements other than the NHPA, such as the tribal AIP and NEPA. The tailored process outlined in this plan is also used to assess affects to ineligible resources. The three possible outcomes are: 1. No Resources Affected. No cultural resources are present within the area of potential effect for the proposed undertaking; or cultural resources are present in the area, but the proposed undertaking will have no effect on the characteristics that make the resources culturally important. Because the INL CRM Office maintains a complete record of INL cultural resource investigations and comprehensive resource inventories, most of these questions can be answered by contacting the INL CRM Office staff. 50
Table 2. INL activities exempt from review (no activities at EBR-I are exempted except as noted below). Activity Type 1. Emergency response 2. Routine maintenance activities 3. Replacement in kind 4. Energy conservation measures Description Activities declared by the appropriate INL official, U.S. president, a tribal government, or the governor of a state as necessary to safeguard human health and the environment during declared disasters, emergencies, or national security threats (including EBR-I). Activities that include, but are not limited to, normal custodial services; electrical and plumbing installation or repair; repair of fire suppression systems, alarms, or communication systems; moving or assembly of interior furnishings; resurfacing of road, sidewalk, and parking areas; routine decontamination (through such activities as wiping down with rags, using strippable latex, and minor vacuuming, but excluding scabbing) of the surfaces of equipment, rooms, or other interior surfaces. Replacement of fixtures or components of a property, such as matching paint with existing or similar paint color, refinishing materials with existing or similar colors, or replacing or installing carpeting with water-soluble glue. This exemption includes refinishing with products that have improved safety, environmental, or health considerations over the existing or original, as long as the color of the refinishing product is similar to or matches the existing original color. Activities that include, but are not limited to, modifications to heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems; insulation to roofs, crawl spaces, walls, and floors; and caulking and weather stripping that are not visible or do not significantly alter or detract from those qualities that make the property eligible for nomination to the NRHP. 5. Security systems Installation, maintenance, or repair of security systems, including computer security, detection, monitoring, surveillance, and alarm systems. 6. Safety systems Installation, maintenance, and repair or modification of personnel safety systems and devices within the built environment, such as radiation monitoring devices; emergency exit lighting systems; protective additions to electrical equipment; improvements to walking and working surfaces; and installation of protective railings, guards, or shielding. 7. Asbestos abatement 8. Internal reconfiguration of active laboratories 9. Ground disturbance within fenced facility perimeters Removing or fixing asbestos for safety and health concerns, including lagging, insulating, painting, pipe and duct work, and panel removal. None of these activities may cause structural modifications or alter character-defining features. Asbestos abatement activities strictly associated with the DD&D of properties and that result in permanent, significant structural modification or alteration of the property are not included in this exemption. Changes to the internal configuration of active laboratories or other existing experimental or testing properties within the built environment to accommodate new experiments or tests. Modifications to the ground surface within existing facilities (TAN, EBR-I, WRRTF, NRF, RTC, INTEC, RWMC, MFC) or within 50 ft of existing buildings in unfenced facility areas (CFA, ARA, BORAX). All activities under this exemption are subject to the INL Stop Work Authority (see Appendix A) should cultural resources be unexpectedly encountered at any time. This exemption does not apply to the CITRC facilities. 51
Page 3:
DOE/ID-10997 Revision 4 Idaho Natio
Page 7 and 8:
CONTENTS ABSTRACT .................
Page 9 and 10:
Appendix J—INL Cultural Resource
Page 11 and 12:
ACRONYMS, ABBREVIATIONS, AND SYMBOL
Page 13 and 14:
Co. company COM communication CP-1
Page 15 and 16:
FFA/CO FONSI FPR FRAN FS&R Federal
Page 17 and 18:
kV L LAK LAN LCCDA LCRE LDRD LESAT
Page 19 and 20:
NuPac Nuclear Pacific (manufacture
Page 21 and 22:
SM Stationary Medium Power reactor
Page 23 and 24:
W west WAG waste area group WCF Was
Page 25 and 26:
GLOSSARY The terms defined in this
Page 27 and 28:
compliance. Adherence to specific p
Page 29 and 30:
historic context. An organizing str
Page 31 and 32:
multi-component. A descriptive term
Page 33 and 34: econnaissance survey. A field surve
Page 35 and 36: Idaho National Laboratory Cultural
Page 37 and 38: elevant federal regulations, DOE-ID
Page 39 and 40: programs nationwide. As such, all I
Page 41: organization, agency, museum, or ot
Page 44 and 45: Figure 3. Regional setting of Idaho
Page 46 and 47: extruded from low-shield volcanoes,
Page 48 and 49: The relatively permanent water sour
Page 50 and 51: Gradually, as a result of this pale
Page 52 and 53: fauna, including now-extinct forms
Page 54 and 55: Figure 11. Elko corner-notched dart
Page 56 and 57: The absence of a restrictive sociop
Page 58 and 59: Figure 13. Big Lost River during se
Page 60 and 61: In the 1890s another way station or
Page 62 and 63: History: 1942 to Present In 1942, t
Page 64 and 65: south of MTR at ATRC. At the time o
Page 66 and 67: The Loss of Fluid Test (LOFT) progr
Page 68 and 69: Figure 24. Aerial view of MFC. Othe
Page 70 and 71: Responsibility for Resource Managem
Page 72 and 73: and sacred American Indian sites sc
Page 74 and 75: to the broad patterns of our histor
Page 76 and 77: available information of value. The
Page 78 and 79: times, including during an annual m
Page 80 and 81: INL CRM Office staff have also deve
Page 82 and 83: Figure 27. National Historic Preser
Page 86 and 87: 2. No Adverse Effect. Cultural reso
Page 88 and 89: egular commentary on INL CRM Office
Page 90 and 91: Bonnichsen, B. and R. M. Breckenrid
Page 92 and 93: Executive Order 13287, 2003, “Pre
Page 94 and 95: Kurten, B. and E. Anderson, 1972,
Page 96 and 97: Pierce, K. L. and W. E. Scott, 1982
Page 98 and 99: Stacy, S., 2005a, Historic American
Page 101: Appendix A Legal Basis for Cultural
Page 104 and 105: “Federal Records Act of 1950,”
Page 106 and 107: * “National Environmental Policy
Page 108 and 109: “Preserve America,” 2003 (EO 13
Page 110 and 111: DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY DIRECTIVES Cul
Page 112 and 113: Figure 28. INL Environmental Policy
Page 114 and 115: Figure 30. Bechtel BWXT Environment
Page 116 and 117: *LWP-8000, “Environmental Instruc
Page 119 and 120: Appendix B American Indian Interest
Page 121 and 122: 3. Consultation. DOE and the Tribes
Page 123: Between the Shoshone-Bannock Tribes
Page 127 and 128: BACKGROUND U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERG
Page 129 and 130: III. THE DEPARTMENT WILL ESTABLISH
Page 131: Attachment 2 Agreement-in-Principle
Page 135 and 136:
101
Page 137 and 138:
103
Page 139 and 140:
105
Page 141 and 142:
107
Page 143 and 144:
109
Page 145 and 146:
111
Page 147 and 148:
113
Page 149 and 150:
Attachment 3 Communications Protoco
Page 151 and 152:
Communications Protocol August 10,
Page 153 and 154:
undertaking. The intent of this not
Page 155 and 156:
D. Revision of Procedures These pro
Page 157 and 158:
Attachment 4 Memorandum of Agreemen
Page 159 and 160:
125
Page 161 and 162:
127
Page 163 and 164:
Appendix C Standards and Procedures
Page 165 and 166:
Appendix C Standards and Procedures
Page 167 and 168:
As the INL Cultural Resource Manage
Page 169 and 170:
inclusion in the INL cultural resou
Page 171 and 172:
SHPO, and other involved parties. I
Page 173 and 174:
esource base and enhance long-term
Page 175 and 176:
of any given test excavation will d
Page 177 and 178:
discussed under test excavations. A
Page 179 and 180:
e eligible to the National Register
Page 181 and 182:
Idaho National Laboratory Cultural
Page 183 and 184:
Figure 33. INL CRM Office permit ap
Page 185 and 186:
Figure 35. Intermountain Antiquitie
Page 187 and 188:
Figure 35. (continued.) 153
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Appendix D Strategies and Procedure
Page 195 and 196:
Appendix D Strategies and Procedure
Page 197 and 198:
uildings have been demolished (e.g.
Page 199 and 200:
POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR MANAGIN
Page 201 and 202:
In addition to internal procedures,
Page 203 and 204:
Council consultation, additional ti
Page 205 and 206:
Determination of eligibility 35-mm
Page 207 and 208:
Appendix E Research Designs 173
Page 209 and 210:
Appendix E Research Designs INTRODU
Page 211 and 212:
Therefore, the addressable research
Page 213 and 214:
INL Research Design Each of the pro
Page 215 and 216:
within the last 600 to 1000 years i
Page 217 and 218:
originate and where most processing
Page 219 and 220:
Site taxonomy is based on the amoun
Page 221 and 222:
of the limited number of sites exca
Page 223 and 224:
Research Topic: Historic Indian Occ
Page 225 and 226:
However, artifacts that often have
Page 227 and 228:
Research Question—Does the dramat
Page 229 and 230:
stages of stone tool manufacture ar
Page 231 and 232:
Appendix F Historic Contexts 197
Page 233 and 234:
Appendix F Historic Contexts INTROD
Page 235 and 236:
The Pocatello Naval Ordnance Plant.
Page 237 and 238:
constructed) a rocket ordnance test
Page 239 and 240:
In the Residential Area, the civili
Page 241 and 242:
occurrence of such episodes, how to
Page 243 and 244:
1952. These structures were — and
Page 245 and 246:
scarce resource. Only uranium could
Page 247 and 248:
highway could observe the steam and
Page 249 and 250:
approved in 1962. To the dismay of
Page 251 and 252:
supplied the NRTS as well. Argonne-
Page 253 and 254:
after further testing. When a speci
Page 255 and 256:
months or years of radiation exposu
Page 257 and 258:
The MTR auxiliary buildings were or
Page 259 and 260:
The MTR played a role in most of th
Page 261 and 262:
Because the reactor would operate a
Page 263 and 264:
working area, the Advanced Test Rea
Page 265 and 266:
partners in the safe operation and
Page 267 and 268:
DD&D of the OMRE. The facility then
Page 269 and 270:
and Drydock Company would develop t
Page 271 and 272:
Initially, the Navy sent about thre
Page 273 and 274:
The Army, therefore, set out to exp
Page 275 and 276:
gas-driven turbo-generator. It reac
Page 277 and 278:
$6-7 million; for diesel, $350,000.
Page 279 and 280:
The ANP support facilities were con
Page 281 and 282:
Related to the SNAP program, the AE
Page 283 and 284:
The SPERT experiments took place at
Page 285 and 286:
vessel and control rod drive could
Page 287 and 288:
The PBF reactor achieved its first
Page 289 and 290:
Sub-Theme: Commercial Reactor Safet
Page 291 and 292:
uranium was not a hazard, but the I
Page 293 and 294:
North of the Waste Treatment Comple
Page 295 and 296:
pneumatic transport techniques. Phi
Page 297 and 298:
enriched fuels, aluminum-clad fuels
Page 299 and 300:
uildings, and craft shops. Then the
Page 301 and 302:
of building the reactor. Although t
Page 303 and 304:
DOE is actively seeking new custome
Page 305 and 306:
The three prototypes are presently
Page 307 and 308:
ICPP complex. Changes in waste mana
Page 309 and 310:
came to a halt, unfinished and sudd
Page 311 and 312:
As the Cold War escalated, the numb
Page 313 and 314:
e 3 × 10 11 curies, with an estima
Page 315 and 316:
also became concerned about Rocky F
Page 317 and 318:
Some of the cleanup involved moving
Page 319 and 320:
cleanup, and remediation of nuclear
Page 321 and 322:
Appendix G Programmatic Agreement 2
Page 323 and 324:
289
Page 325 and 326:
291
Page 327 and 328:
293
Page 329 and 330:
Appendix H Inventory of Known INL A
Page 331 and 332:
Appendix H Inventory of Known INL A
Page 333 and 334:
Table 5. (continued). INL Prehistor
Page 335 and 336:
Page 337 and 338:
Page 339 and 340:
Page 341 and 342:
Page 343 and 344:
Page 345 and 346:
Page 347 and 348:
Page 349 and 350:
Page 351 and 352:
Page 353 and 354:
Page 355 and 356:
Page 357 and 358:
Page 359 and 360:
Page 361 and 362:
Page 363 and 364:
Page 365 and 366:
Table 6. INL prehistoric isolated f
Page 367 and 368:
Page 369 and 370:
Page 371 and 372:
Page 373 and 374:
Page 375 and 376:
Page 377 and 378:
Page 379 and 380:
Page 381 and 382:
Page 383 and 384:
Page 385 and 386:
Page 387 and 388:
Page 389 and 390:
Page 391 and 392:
Page 393 and 394:
Page 395 and 396:
Page 397 and 398:
Page 399 and 400:
Table 7. INL historic and multi-com
Page 401 and 402:
Table 7. (continued). INL Historic
Page 403 and 404:
Page 405 and 406:
Page 407 and 408:
Appendix I INL Architectural Proper
Page 409 and 410:
Appendix I INL Architectural Proper
Page 411 and 412:
Table 8. Surveyed INL properties. B
Page 413 and 414:
Table 8. (continued). Building or S
Page 415 and 416:
Page 417 and 418:
Page 419 and 420:
Page 421 and 422:
Page 423 and 424:
Page 425 and 426:
Page 427 and 428:
Page 429 and 430:
Page 431 and 432:
Page 433 and 434:
Page 435 and 436:
Page 437 and 438:
Page 439 and 440:
Page 441 and 442:
Appendix J INL Cultural Resource Pr
Page 443 and 444:
Appendix J INL Cultural Resource Pr
Page 445 and 446:
Table 9. (continued). INL Cultural
Page 447 and 448:
Table 9. (continued). Project Numbe
Page 449 and 450:
Page 451 and 452:
Page 453 and 454:
Page 455 and 456:
Page 457 and 458:
Page 459 and 460:
Page 461 and 462:
Page 463 and 464:
Page 465 and 466:
Page 467 and 468:
Page 469 and 470:
Table 10. (continued). INL CRM Offi
Page 471 and 472:
Table 10. (continued). INL CRM Offi
Page 473 and 474:
Table 11. INL Cultural Resource Man
Page 475 and 476:
Table 11. (continued). Project Numb
Page 477 and 478:
Page 479 and 480:
Page 481 and 482:
Page 483 and 484:
Page 485 and 486:
Page 487 and 488:
Appendix K Goals and Tasks 453
Page 489 and 490:
Appendix K Goals and Tasks INTRODUC
Page 491 and 492:
Task 2. Maintain memberships in pro
Page 493 and 494:
Appendix L Idaho National Laborator
Page 495 and 496:
Appendix L Idaho National Laborator
Page 497:
Figure 38. Example of INL Cultural
show all

Idaho National Laboratory Cultural Resource Management Plan

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?