11.03.2014 Views

Participation and Democracy: Dynamics, Causes ... - Jacobs University

Participation and Democracy: Dynamics, Causes ... - Jacobs University

Participation and Democracy: Dynamics, Causes ... - Jacobs University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Model 3:<br />

β 1j = γ 10 + γ 11 (Membership level) + γ 12 (Level of informal networks) + γ 13 (Trust level)<br />

+ u 1j .<br />

β 2j = γ 20 + γ 21 (Membership level) + γ 22 (Level of informal networks) + γ 23 (Trust level)<br />

+ u 2j .<br />

β 3j = γ 30 + γ 31 (Membership level) + γ 32 (Level of informal networks) + γ 33 (Trust level)<br />

+ u 3j .<br />

γ 10 , γ 20 <strong>and</strong> γ 30 are the intercepts for the respective membership, informal networks <strong>and</strong><br />

trust slopes. γ 11 , γ 12 <strong>and</strong> γ 13 are the effects of the level-2 factors membership level, level<br />

of informal networks, <strong>and</strong> trust level in a society on individual membership in a voluntary<br />

association. γ 21 , γ 22 <strong>and</strong> γ 23 are the effects of the same level-2 factors on individual<br />

embeddedness in informal networks, γ 31 , γ 32 <strong>and</strong> γ 33 represent the level-2 effects on trust.<br />

After introducing the model equations, Table 6-5 presents the results of the multi-level<br />

model. For an easier interpretation, odds ratios (instead of log odds coefficients) are<br />

documented. The data entries show how the odds ratios are changing when a one-unit<br />

increase in the independent variable occurs (odds with increase compared to odds without<br />

an increase in the predictor). Does social capital as an individual or as a societal attribute<br />

(or as an interplay of both) make people participate in elite-challenging activities? 56<br />

The results in Table 7-5 are straightforward. All three social-capital related, individuallevel<br />

predictors in Model 1 have a positive <strong>and</strong> significant effect on participation in elitechallenging<br />

activities. Members in voluntary associations join demonstrations, petitions,<br />

<strong>and</strong> activities of political consumerism twice as often as nonmembers. Compared to<br />

membership, the other social capital characteristics, embeddedness in informal networks<br />

<strong>and</strong> trust, do not play such an important role. Contrasting the lowest with the highest<br />

possible trust score (21-point scale), for example, the odds ratio to participate in elitechallenging<br />

activities improves not even by factor two (1.8). Looking at the sociodemographic<br />

control factors, females are slightly more likely to take part in elitechallenging<br />

activities than men (1.2). <strong>Participation</strong> decreases with age, <strong>and</strong>, corroborating<br />

several participation studies, the level of education has a positive effect on people’s<br />

56 For the detailed stepwise multi-level model (HGLM) please see Appendix A7-5.<br />

131

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!