11.03.2014 Views

Participation and Democracy: Dynamics, Causes ... - Jacobs University

Participation and Democracy: Dynamics, Causes ... - Jacobs University

Participation and Democracy: Dynamics, Causes ... - Jacobs University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2004. A comparison with regression models run without status inconsistency as an<br />

independent variable suggests slightly stronger effects for income, whereas the effects for<br />

education remain largely unaffected or even underestimated. 60<br />

The most important change affects the relationship between gender <strong>and</strong> participation in<br />

elite-challenging activities. Within a 30-years time, the gender gap that used to<br />

characterize political participation has reversed: Today women rather than men<br />

participate in elite-challenging activities. It should be noted that the dependent variable in<br />

Model 1 contains only one item for political consumerism – boycotting certain products.<br />

A closer inspection of a combined measure for political consumerism (buy-cotting <strong>and</strong><br />

boycotting) in the 2004 ESS data reveals that the changing gender relations are even<br />

more pronounced: political consumerism is female (see also Stolle <strong>and</strong> Hooghe 2005).<br />

But also the gender gap in conventional participation has become smaller, although this<br />

mode of participation is still a domain of men (see Model 2), whereas the results of<br />

Model 3 confirm findings of the participation literature: there is no more a gender gap in<br />

voting.<br />

To summarize the analysis, gender, education <strong>and</strong> age are the main resources that affect<br />

participation in elite-challenging action. Do the results change when motivation<br />

components are added to the analysis?<br />

Table 8-2 presents the results of a second logistic regression that uses in addition to<br />

socio-economic resources also motivational components to predict participation. From<br />

the broad range of variables presented in the participation literature, the following factors<br />

are included: political interest, political efficacy, life satisfaction, <strong>and</strong> the respondent’s<br />

position on the left-right scale. Postmaterialism is also known as a main motivation factor<br />

for elite-challenging activities, but the ESS 2004 does unfortunately not include any item<br />

from Inglehart’s postmaterialism scale. An inspection of a Political Action Study model<br />

(1974) that includes postmaterialism as a predictor confirms a positive <strong>and</strong> significant<br />

relationship (table not shown). The multi-level model based on data from the World<br />

Values Survey data will take this into account <strong>and</strong> include it as a predictor.<br />

60 The results are robust: Alternative ways of operationalizing status inconsistency yielded similar results:<br />

(a) 5 types of status inconsistency (instead of 3); (b) a dichotomy with 1= positive status inconsistency; (c)<br />

st<strong>and</strong>ardized residuals from a regression of education on income, <strong>and</strong> (d) status inconsistency squared<br />

(based on (c)).<br />

140

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!