11.03.2014 Views

Participation and Democracy: Dynamics, Causes ... - Jacobs University

Participation and Democracy: Dynamics, Causes ... - Jacobs University

Participation and Democracy: Dynamics, Causes ... - Jacobs University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

28-29). The experience of these activities does not leave people’s value orientations<br />

unaltered, shifting priorities from survival to self-expression values.<br />

As Inglehart <strong>and</strong> Welzel (2005: 28-29) have argued, postindustrial societies differ from<br />

industrial societies in three major aspects. First, postindustrial societies like the ones in<br />

Western Europe or the USA after World War II have experienced an unprecedented<br />

phase of peace, security <strong>and</strong> economic prosperity. As people tend to pursue goals that<br />

are short in supply (Inglehart 1977: 22), <strong>and</strong> as they strive for higher goals once material<br />

goals (like physical <strong>and</strong> economic security) are accomplished, people tend to put<br />

stronger emphasis on self-actualization Maslow (1954). 5<br />

Second, as tasks in the service sector tend to be cognitively more dem<strong>and</strong>ing than<br />

previous activities, broad access to higher education becomes a necessary condition for<br />

societies to become (or stay) competitive. Postindustrial societies are therefore<br />

characterized by higher levels of formal education. At the same time, this cognitive<br />

mobilization leaves an imprint on people’s belief systems. “Thus, rising levels of<br />

education, increasing cognitive <strong>and</strong> informational requirements in economic activities,<br />

<strong>and</strong> increasing proliferation of knowledge via mass media make people intellectually<br />

more independent, diminishing cognitive constraints on human choice” (Inglehart <strong>and</strong><br />

Welzel 2005: 29).<br />

Third, as their daily work activities become more independent <strong>and</strong> dest<strong>and</strong>ardized,<br />

people dem<strong>and</strong> the same kind of independence, choice <strong>and</strong> creative power in other areas<br />

of their lives. The expansion of the welfare state has contributed to the realization of<br />

these dem<strong>and</strong>s, protecting the individual against certain risks that previously have been<br />

covered by close group ties. Today, the belonging to a group, be it the family or the<br />

church, is no longer a question of survival but of choice (Beck 2002). Families <strong>and</strong> other<br />

group affiliations are changing “from a community of need to elective affinities” (Beck-<br />

Gernsheim 1998).<br />

All three processes show how people change their values as a response to the conditions<br />

that surround them. Given the favorable circumstances described above, all three<br />

5 Inglehart (1977, 1990) has referred to Maslow’s values of self-actualization as postmaterialistic values,<br />

emphasizing nonphysiological needs such as (self) esteem, self-enhancement <strong>and</strong> aesthetic satisfaction.<br />

Opposed to that are materialistic values, fulfilling material or physiological needs such as survival <strong>and</strong><br />

security.<br />

19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!