11.03.2014 Views

Participation and Democracy: Dynamics, Causes ... - Jacobs University

Participation and Democracy: Dynamics, Causes ... - Jacobs University

Participation and Democracy: Dynamics, Causes ... - Jacobs University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 8-1:<br />

Binary-Logistic Regression: Resources <strong>and</strong> <strong>Participation</strong><br />

(Political Action Study 1974 <strong>and</strong> European Social Survey 2004)<br />

Dependent variable:<br />

Elite-Challenging<br />

participation<br />

Political<br />

Action<br />

(1974)<br />

ESS<br />

(2004)<br />

Conventional<br />

<strong>Participation</strong><br />

Political<br />

Action<br />

(1974)<br />

ESS<br />

(2004)<br />

Political<br />

Action<br />

(1974)<br />

Voting<br />

Gender (0=male) .70 *** 1.20 ** 0.37 *** 0.68 *** 0.94 0.91<br />

Age<br />

reference: 65+ years<br />

25 <strong>and</strong> younger<br />

26 to 35 years<br />

36 to 45 years<br />

46 to 55 years<br />

56 to 65 years<br />

Education<br />

reference: com. level<br />

middle level<br />

higher level<br />

Income<br />

reference: low level<br />

middle level<br />

high level<br />

Status inconsistency:<br />

reference: positive<br />

no inconsistency<br />

1.22<br />

1.54 **<br />

1.59 **<br />

1.48 **<br />

1.11<br />

ESS<br />

(2004)<br />

2.37 ***<br />

1.89 ***<br />

1.88 ***<br />

1.81 ***<br />

1.56 *** 0.89<br />

1.33 *<br />

1.47 **<br />

1.45 **<br />

1.44 ** 0.88<br />

1.05<br />

1.45 *<br />

2.16 ***<br />

1.74 *** 0.11 ***<br />

0.71 *<br />

1.24<br />

1.32<br />

1.45 * 0.36 ***<br />

0.36 ***<br />

0.54 ***<br />

0.83<br />

1.14<br />

1.65 *** 2.32 ** 1.73 *** 1.17<br />

1.91 * 4.04 * 3.29 *** 1.85<br />

1.57 * 0.95<br />

2.20 ** 1.14<br />

1.10<br />

1.45<br />

1.02<br />

1.34<br />

1.09 1.45 *<br />

3.58 ** 4.40<br />

0.87<br />

0.84<br />

1.05<br />

1.12<br />

negative inconsistency<br />

1.24<br />

1.89 * 0.83<br />

0.83<br />

.97<br />

.96<br />

1.01<br />

1.12<br />

0.74<br />

0.62<br />

0.94<br />

0.76<br />

Constant 0.32 0.15 1.15 0.20 7.97 3.87<br />

N 6.539 7.636 7.126 7.662 7.077 7.071<br />

Pseudo R sq. .09 .08 .13 .06 .24 .08<br />

Countries included: Great Britain, West Germany, Netherl<strong>and</strong>s, Austria, Switzerl<strong>and</strong>, Finl<strong>and</strong>.<br />

Samples equally weighted n = 1.000. Coding of the variables:<br />

(1) Elite-challenging participation<br />

Political Action Study: “Please place the cards on this scale to show me first whether 1) you have actually<br />

done any of these things on the cards using the past ten years; 2) you would do any of these things if it were<br />

important to you; 3) you might do it in a particular situation or 4) you would never do it under any<br />

circumstances.”<br />

- Signing a petition?<br />

- Joining in boycotts?<br />

- Attending lawful demonstrations?<br />

Recoded into 0=have not done anything, 1=have done at least one of the activities.<br />

ESS: “There are different ways of trying to improve things in (country) or help prevent things from going<br />

wrong. During the last 12 months, have you done any of the following?“<br />

- signed a petition?<br />

- taken part in a lawful demonstration?<br />

- boycotted certain products?<br />

Recoded into 0=have not done anything, 1=have done at least one of the activities.<br />

59 Kohler (2005: 230) refers to Friedrich (1998) who identified four different aspects of individualization: a<br />

broadened action repertoire; a decreasing importance of legitimized rules of behavior; an emergence of new<br />

inequalities; <strong>and</strong> an increase of the share of people who view themselves as individuals.<br />

138

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!