30.10.2012 Views

Public Management and Administration - Owen E.hughes

Public Management and Administration - Owen E.hughes

Public Management and Administration - Owen E.hughes

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5<br />

<strong>Public</strong> Enterprise<br />

Introduction<br />

<strong>Public</strong> enterprise was for a long time an important part of the public sector in most<br />

developed or developing countries (Farazm<strong>and</strong>, 1996), but, with privatization, the<br />

size <strong>and</strong> importance of the sector is declining. It now seems in some danger of disappearing<br />

altogether as countries have rapidly moved away from government production<br />

through public enterprise. There are two reasons for looking at public<br />

enterprise as part of public sector management. First, the sector is particularly<br />

important for arguments about the scope of government activity <strong>and</strong> the debate<br />

<strong>and</strong> outcome of privatization of public enterprise has implications for the public<br />

sector as a whole. Secondly, public enterprises pose particular management problems<br />

even compared to the rest of the public sector, most noticeably the control<br />

<strong>and</strong> accountability of government organizations aiming to make money.<br />

<strong>Public</strong> enterprises were the first target of those aiming to reduce the size of<br />

the public sector in the 1980s. Even though major public enterprises such as the<br />

post office still exist in many Western countries, including the United States,<br />

there seems little doubt that the idea of government-owned organizations selling<br />

goods <strong>and</strong> services to the public has passed its heyday. Although the public<br />

enterprise sector was large in many countries its activities formed only a minor<br />

part of political discourse. Starting in the early 1980s it became a focus of political<br />

controversy, with its very existence in question. One of the key, <strong>and</strong> quite<br />

unresolvable, political questions concerns the allowable limit of government<br />

activity. Matters of ideology about the overall role of government became bound<br />

up with the ownership of public enterprise. As public enterprises operated at the<br />

boundary of public <strong>and</strong> private sectors in mixed economies, arguments about<br />

them were often about the desirable role of government itself. The answer in the<br />

debate was overwhelming, in developed <strong>and</strong> developing countries alike, that<br />

governments should dispose of their public enterprises: <strong>and</strong> they did. The most<br />

significant of the early programmes of privatization was in the United Kingdom.<br />

Between 1979 <strong>and</strong> 1993 nationalized industries in that country fell from 11 per<br />

cent of GDP to 2 per cent, <strong>and</strong> from 1.8 million employees in 1980 it fell to less<br />

than 400 000 in 1994 (Kamarck, 2000, p. 240). The privatization movement<br />

94

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!