Public Management and Administration - Owen E.hughes
Public Management and Administration - Owen E.hughes
Public Management and Administration - Owen E.hughes
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
168 <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Management</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Administration</strong><br />
their aggregate levels, an attempt can be made indirectly to influence the entire<br />
economy. With the advent of Keynesian economics, governments explicitly<br />
accepted responsibility for promoting full employment, price stability, economic<br />
growth <strong>and</strong> a stable balance of payments.<br />
Fiscal policy is important for providing stability for the economy. Although<br />
spending <strong>and</strong> taxing have economic effects of their own, the net balance<br />
between them – the deficit or surplus – is of major importance. Keynesian economic<br />
theory argues that if the budget is in deficit – expenditure greater than<br />
revenue – the overall effects are multiplied so that the whole economy can be<br />
stimulated. If the economy is overheated, then the government can, in theory,<br />
budget for a surplus to slow the economy. The budget balance can also have<br />
effects on the net debt position of the government, <strong>and</strong> can cause reactions in<br />
the private sector, especially in financial markets.<br />
However, from the 1970s there was a change in the intellectual respectability<br />
of the Keynesian model. Relying on the government budget to manage the<br />
economy originally represented an economic revolution in that budgets did not<br />
have to be balanced every year. By varying its budget balance a government<br />
could, in theory, ameliorate the damaging affects of the boom <strong>and</strong> bust business<br />
cycle. The Keynesian model promised much <strong>and</strong> was successful for some time,<br />
but the coincidence of high inflation <strong>and</strong> high unemployment in the mid-1970s<br />
produced a reassessment. The orthodoxy is now that of ‘neoclassicism’, with<br />
the emphasis placed on reducing government, balancing the budget <strong>and</strong> letting<br />
market forces find a desirable economic equilibrium.<br />
Financial functions of the budget<br />
The financial functions of the budget are analogous to accounting. Balance<br />
sheets need to be drawn up for the whole of government activity, in the same<br />
way as in the private sector. The financial functions of the budget are: first, an<br />
evaluation of total government <strong>and</strong> public authority expenditures within the<br />
budget sector; <strong>and</strong>, secondly, to act as the legislature’s instrument of accountability<br />
<strong>and</strong> control over the government in its h<strong>and</strong>ling of financial matters. The<br />
first of these is a pure accounting function to set out estimates of receipts <strong>and</strong><br />
expenditures. The second is an important part of the system of accountability.<br />
In the earliest days of the English Parliament the financial role was the most<br />
important role of the legislature, <strong>and</strong> one that continues today. Magna Carta<br />
was concerned in part with financial matters, with the Crown agreeing to consult<br />
the nobles when taxation was contemplated. A long struggle between the<br />
Crown <strong>and</strong> Parliament gradually led to the latter’s approval being necessary<br />
when taxation was raised, <strong>and</strong> spending of it was in turn reported back to<br />
Parliament. Even now, budget day is traditionally the most important day of the<br />
parliamentary calendar. Other countries, particularly those with a British heritage,<br />
have a similar financial reliance on the legislature. A United States