Public Management and Administration - Owen E.hughes
Public Management and Administration - Owen E.hughes
Public Management and Administration - Owen E.hughes
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
154 <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Management</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Administration</strong><br />
in the battle to contain costs, governments will look at any alternative. Staff are<br />
now increasingly recruited at all levels. Base grade appointment is becoming<br />
quite rare in some places <strong>and</strong> it is more common to recruit graduates or even<br />
department heads directly from outside.<br />
<strong>Public</strong> sector employment has generally declined. Among the advanced<br />
countries there is a general decline in numbers employed by government as<br />
a percentage of the workforce (Pollitt <strong>and</strong> Bouckaert, 2000). In the United<br />
Kingdom, for example, between 1979 <strong>and</strong> 1999 public sector employment in<br />
the UK fell from 6.5 million to 4 million, although definitional changes make<br />
a strict comparison difficult to make (Greenwood, Pyper <strong>and</strong> Wilson, 2002,<br />
p. 17). The National Health Service is no longer part of the public service, but<br />
is publicly funded <strong>and</strong> with close to a million employees those numbers should<br />
really be added to the 4 million cited above. In general, however, a number of<br />
countries have reduced the number of public employees.<br />
These changes have been controversial <strong>and</strong> were resisted by employees <strong>and</strong><br />
unions. But at a time when flexibility, a mobile workforce <strong>and</strong> management by<br />
results are common in the private sector, it makes no sense for the public services<br />
to insist on the personnel practices of a past age. Caiden (1982, p. 183)<br />
refers to ‘the bulk of public employment where conditions are similar to those<br />
obtaining in the private sector’ <strong>and</strong> this is, in fact, the case. Except, arguably, at<br />
the highest levels, most public servants carry out similar duties to those in business.<br />
Personnel practices peculiar to the public sector were introduced because<br />
government work was considered to be quite different, but increase in size <strong>and</strong><br />
function has meant that most public servants are engaged in service delivery, not<br />
policy advice, <strong>and</strong> the case for different st<strong>and</strong>ards of employment is less tenable.<br />
It follows that personnel arrangements more like those in the private sector<br />
will become commonplace. According to Osborne <strong>and</strong> Gaebler, public sector<br />
experiments have shown the success of ‘broad classifications <strong>and</strong> pay b<strong>and</strong>s;<br />
market salaries; performance-based pay; <strong>and</strong> promotion <strong>and</strong> lay-offs by performance<br />
rather than seniority’, <strong>and</strong> that other important elements of a personnel<br />
system could include: ‘hiring systems that allow managers to hire the most<br />
qualified people … aggressive recruitment of the best people; <strong>and</strong> streamlining<br />
of the appeals process for employees who are fired’ (1992, p. 129).<br />
The public service is now more competent than it was. Better methods<br />
of management <strong>and</strong> analysis as well as recruitment <strong>and</strong> promotion procedures<br />
are likely to make public sector managers smarter, especially when<br />
combined with better utilization of new technology. The human resources<br />
available now are certainly better than they were, when it was assumed that<br />
public administration required no special competence. Greater flexibility in<br />
promotion <strong>and</strong> improved performance measurement should allow the competent<br />
to rise faster. With the demise of the career service model, staff are less<br />
likely to spend their entire careers in one agency, or even in public service, but<br />
to interchange between public <strong>and</strong> private sectors. In addition, while there<br />
are criticisms of having economists or management specialists in charge of