30.10.2012 Views

Public Management and Administration - Owen E.hughes

Public Management and Administration - Owen E.hughes

Public Management and Administration - Owen E.hughes

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

However, the managerial model is still controversial. Advocates view public<br />

management as offering a new way of looking at <strong>and</strong> carrying out management<br />

functions within the public sector. As an alternative to traditional administration,<br />

public management may offer a more realistic approach given the manifest<br />

problems of the earlier model. Critics, however, regard it as simply an<br />

unquestioning adoption of the worst features of private management which pays<br />

no regard to the fundamental differences in the public sector environment.<br />

Managerialism is seen by them as somehow against the traditions of public<br />

service, inimical to service delivery <strong>and</strong> undemocratic, even with dubious theoretical<br />

backing. Some writers, particularly from a public administration tradition,<br />

argue that the good parts of the old model – high ethical st<strong>and</strong>ards, service<br />

to the state – are being cast aside in the headlong rush to adopt the new theory.<br />

The argument here is that public management is sufficiently different from<br />

public administration to be regarded as a new paradigm. A new model of public<br />

management has effectively supplanted the traditional model of public administration,<br />

<strong>and</strong> the public sector in the future will inevitably be managerial, in both<br />

theory <strong>and</strong> practice. It is important to identify potential problems in the new<br />

approach <strong>and</strong> propose solutions to them, although it seems most unlikely that<br />

there will be a return to the traditional model of administration. While this new<br />

model may cause some problems <strong>and</strong> pose some dangers, the benefits are likely<br />

to be far greater than the costs. <strong>Public</strong> management need not mean the widespread<br />

<strong>and</strong> uncritical adoption of practices from the private sector. What it should<br />

mean is that a distinctive public management needs to be developed. This should<br />

take account of the differences between the sectors, but still recognizes that the<br />

work being done by public servants is now managerial rather than administrative.<br />

The meaning of management<br />

It was argued earlier (Chapter 1) that management is different from administration<br />

in meaning. Essentially, administration means following instructions<br />

<strong>and</strong> management means the achievement of results <strong>and</strong> taking personal responsibility<br />

for doing so. As Rainey argues, public management ‘has semantic<br />

origins that imply taking things in h<strong>and</strong>’ <strong>and</strong> this ‘suggests a firmness <strong>and</strong> efficiency<br />

of the sort attributed in stereotype to business management’ (1990,<br />

p. 158). How management is different from administration can be considered by<br />

looking at what Allison (1982) refers to as ‘functions of general management’.<br />

Functions of general management<br />

STRATEGY<br />

<strong>Public</strong> <strong>Management</strong> 45<br />

1. Establishing objectives <strong>and</strong> priorities for the organization (on the basis of forecasts<br />

of the external environment <strong>and</strong> the organization’s capacities).<br />

2. Devising operational plans to achieve these objectives.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!