Public Management and Administration - Owen E.hughes
Public Management and Administration - Owen E.hughes
Public Management and Administration - Owen E.hughes
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
then spread to other countries, to the extent that, from the early 1980s to 1993,<br />
more than 7000 enterprises had been privatized (Farazm<strong>and</strong>, 1996, p. 18).<br />
<strong>Public</strong> enterprises always had particular management problems, including<br />
accountability, regulation, social <strong>and</strong> industrial policies, investment policy, <strong>and</strong><br />
financial controls. Of all these, control <strong>and</strong> accountability are particular problems<br />
for public enterprises, which are deliberately set up to be relatively independent<br />
of direct political control. Setting control at a satisfactory level has<br />
been a perennial problem both for governments <strong>and</strong> their enterprises. If control<br />
is too tight, there is no advantage in having them set up as entities with a significant<br />
degree of independence. If government control is too loose, an enterprise<br />
may not be accountable to its owners, the public, raising a question as to<br />
why it is in government h<strong>and</strong>s at all. Indeed, one of the arguments for privatization<br />
is that public enterprises cannot be effectively controlled <strong>and</strong> their<br />
accountability is inherently inferior to that of private companies.<br />
<strong>Public</strong> enterprises are a noteworthy part of the public sector. They may<br />
shrink so far as to become nothing more than an interesting diversion in the history<br />
of governmental institutions. They may, though much less likely, gain a<br />
new lease of life. Perhaps all activities that can be carried out by the private sector,<br />
should be. Even with widespread privatization, public enterprise is still an<br />
important part of the public sector in many countries <strong>and</strong> many of the arguments<br />
about reducing public enterprise also apply to the public sector in general.<br />
Reasons for establishing public enterprise<br />
Governments have established public enterprises for a variety of reasons. These<br />
can include: inadequate private supply of goods <strong>and</strong> services; rescuing private<br />
firms if their closure is against the public interest; improving competition;<br />
reducing social costs such as environmental externalities; even to protect<br />
national sovereignty in some way. Hood notes that the Japanese tobacco <strong>and</strong><br />
salt monopolies were established to pay for the war with Russia in 1905 <strong>and</strong><br />
that mail services were set up as government monopolies to facilitate spying on<br />
correspondence (Hood, 1994, p. 37). Renault was nationalized by the French<br />
government after World War II because of wartime collaboration by its then<br />
owners. Some developing countries prefer having public enterprise to having<br />
foreign ownership of important services. Farazm<strong>and</strong> argues recognizable public<br />
enterprises existed as long ago as the Persian Empire, in the fourth <strong>and</strong> fifth<br />
centuries BC <strong>and</strong> these were established partly for national prestige purposes<br />
(1996, pp. 2–3). There are many other reasons; indeed, so many, that government<br />
ownership is the only point in common.<br />
Rees (1984, p. 2) argues that there are four reasons for the existence of<br />
public enterprise:<br />
● To ‘correct’ market failure.<br />
● To alter the structure of pay-offs in an economy.<br />
<strong>Public</strong> Enterprise 95