20.03.2014 Views

Burma: Census of India 1901 Vol. I - Khamkoo

Burma: Census of India 1901 Vol. I - Khamkoo

Burma: Census of India 1901 Vol. I - Khamkoo

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

— —<br />

02 REPORT ON THE CENSUS OF BURMA.<br />

Table No. VIII. In 1891 the periods selected for exhibition in the education<br />

table for that <strong>Census</strong> (Imperial Table No. IX) were three in number, namely, 0—15,<br />

15— 25, and 25 and over. The age periods now adopted are four, so selected as<br />

to divide the younger members <strong>of</strong> the literate population up into groups corresponding<br />

approximately to primary, secondary and higher education. They are<br />

o— 10, 10—15, 1<br />

5— 2° and 2 ° and over -<br />

The two first oi the I9° X age P enods<br />

combined cover the same ground as the first <strong>of</strong> the 1891 age periods, but after<br />

the age <strong>of</strong> fifteen has been passed a contrast by age periods <strong>of</strong> the figures for<br />

the recent and for the previous <strong>Census</strong> is impracticable.<br />

87. There is one more point <strong>of</strong> special importance in connection with the definition<br />

<strong>of</strong> literacy, which should be kept in view when<br />

Treatment <strong>of</strong> those only able to<br />

a comTast <strong>of</strong> the returns <strong>of</strong> the last census with those<br />

sign then- names.<br />

oi previous enumerations is undertaken. In 1891 the<br />

instructions for filling up column 12 <strong>of</strong> the Schedule for the enumeration <strong>of</strong> that<br />

year concluded with the following passage :<br />

"Enter as Illiterate those who are not under instruction and who do not know how<br />

to both read and write, or who can read but not write, or can sign their name<br />

but not read."<br />

The last eight words are those to which I would draw special attention. They<br />

exclude from the rank <strong>of</strong> literates all persons whose accomplishments with the pen<br />

and pencil extend no further than to the scrawling <strong>of</strong> their name at the foot <strong>of</strong> a<br />

petition or a receipt. This class was similarly denied admission into the literate<br />

category in 1881. The principle underlying this distinction is indicated in one <strong>of</strong><br />

the earlier paragraphs <strong>of</strong> Chapter VI <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Census</strong> Commissioner's General<br />

Report for <strong>India</strong> 1891 in the following words :<br />

"Then, again, in the present day so many messengers, porters and other menials<br />

find it to their advantage to be able to sign their names that they acquire<br />

this amount <strong>of</strong> literature without ever advancing beyond it ; and it was held<br />

advisable to specially exclude this class from the category <strong>of</strong> literate."<br />

In the 1 90 1 instructions for filling up column 14 <strong>of</strong> the Schedule (" Literate or<br />

Illiterate") no reference was made to the treatment <strong>of</strong> these illiterate signers and<br />

the questions therefore arise ;<br />

were they as a rule included among the literates at<br />

to have affected the<br />

the recent enumeration and, if they were, are their totals likely<br />

aggregate <strong>of</strong> literacy to an appreciable extent ? I should on the whole be disposed<br />

to answer both questions in the affirmative. If it were a question <strong>of</strong> omitting or<br />

not omitting from the roll <strong>of</strong> literates a handful <strong>of</strong> bill collectors in the few mercantile<br />

centres <strong>of</strong> the country, it would matter but little whether persons who could sign<br />

their names and nothing more were treated as literate or not. In <strong>Burma</strong>, however,<br />

it is more than a question <strong>of</strong> a few commercial menials, for a very substantial section<br />

<strong>of</strong> the male indigenous community hovers on the border line between literacy<br />

and illiteracy and it needs <strong>of</strong>ten but a trifle to turn the scale one way or the other.<br />

High as is the proportion <strong>of</strong> the educated to the total population <strong>of</strong> the province,<br />

it would be vain to suppose that the lettered <strong>Burma</strong>n was removed by many degrees<br />

from his unlettered countryman. The monastic curriculum is not severe and at best<br />

the literacy <strong>of</strong> the bulk <strong>of</strong> the folk is a plant <strong>of</strong> shallow growth. A few years neglect<br />

will <strong>of</strong>ten suffice to wither it, and it not infrequently happens that the only<br />

remnant <strong>of</strong> his early teaching left to a man who would resent <strong>of</strong>f-hand the imputation<br />

<strong>of</strong> illiteracy, is found, when the matter is looked into, to be his power <strong>of</strong> appending<br />

his own signature to a document. With a keen and conscientious enumerator<br />

such an one would have been treated as an illiterate at the 1881 and 1891 <strong>Census</strong>es,<br />

while there is nothing to show that, provided he could laboriously inscribe the<br />

letters <strong>of</strong> his name, he would not at the recent enumeration have been assumed to<br />

be capable <strong>of</strong> spelling the result and, on the strength <strong>of</strong> this performance, have<br />

been assigned a place in the dignified ranks <strong>of</strong> the literate. It is far from likely<br />

that the number added to the literate population <strong>of</strong> the province by the omission<br />

from the instructions <strong>of</strong> the eight words aforesaid is anything very great, but the<br />

facts that that omission existed and that it probably had an influence <strong>of</strong> its own<br />

upon the figures cannot reasonably be ignored.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!