Europeanisation, National Identities and Migration ... - europeanization
Europeanisation, National Identities and Migration ... - europeanization
Europeanisation, National Identities and Migration ... - europeanization
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
German trade unions <strong>and</strong> Polish migrant workers 209<br />
BAU had become a social democratic member of the federal parliament. The<br />
hotline between officials from the trade union <strong>and</strong> the governing party contributed<br />
to the fact that the issue of granting free movement for the c<strong>and</strong>idate states became<br />
a top priority. Chancellor Schröder personally supported the trade unions’ claims<br />
<strong>and</strong> spoke in favour of postponing the free movement of workers. In March 2001<br />
the German government proposed a regulation scheme that finally became the<br />
position of the European Commission in the accession negotiations with the<br />
c<strong>and</strong>idate states: the free movement of workers from accession states is granted as<br />
a rule, but every old member state has the right to declare reservations <strong>and</strong> to<br />
postpone free movement for up to seven years within its own national territory.<br />
After three <strong>and</strong> five years the restrictions have to be reviewed <strong>and</strong> may be abolished<br />
or prolonged up to a maximum of seven years. IG BAU declared the decision to<br />
postpone free movement as a direct outcome of IG BAU lobbying:<br />
The IG BAU prevailed against the Federal government: the temporary<br />
arrangements to restrict the free movement of workers <strong>and</strong> services was<br />
extended to seven years. The Federal government succeeded, in that the EU<br />
Commission basically changed its negotiation position.<br />
(Foundation Stone 2000/7–8: 9)<br />
IG BAU presented itself as a successful political actor effectively representing its<br />
members’ interests. But with the end of the debate on Eastern enlargement the<br />
problems remained unsolved <strong>and</strong> the question remained how to cope with the<br />
existing bad situation.<br />
Illegally employed foreigners as interlopers<br />
Currently, IG BAU is intensifying its efforts to direct attention to illegal employment<br />
in the construction industry. The earlier account already revealed that the criticism<br />
of irregular or illegal employment had been a constant issue, raised for each of the<br />
mentioned categories of interlopers from outside. This thread is contemporarily<br />
resumed <strong>and</strong> intensified. The cover story of the Foundation Stone for June 2001<br />
published the message of ‘Construction site as scene of the crime: 300,000 illegals’.<br />
According to this report German construction sites are characterised by a Mafialike<br />
situation. The report opened with the description of a police action against a<br />
criminal network of 112 enterprises which used to exploit Portuguese workers with<br />
a tax <strong>and</strong> social contribution fraud of 17 million euro. The report continues:<br />
According to estimations by IG BAU, 300,000 illegals work on German<br />
construction sites. Of those about 150,000 come from East Europe, mainly<br />
Pol<strong>and</strong>. 75,000 come from Portugal <strong>and</strong> 25,000 from ex-Yugoslavia <strong>and</strong><br />
Turkey respectively. In February 2001 the number of statistically registered<br />
construction workers in Germany lay under one million for the first time. The<br />
Mafiosi pay the 300,000 illegals starvation wages of 6 euro. They do not pay<br />
social contributions at all, no taxes, no pension contributions. ...A Western<br />
German skilled worker therefore costs five or ten times more than an illegal.