Europeanisation, National Identities and Migration ... - europeanization
Europeanisation, National Identities and Migration ... - europeanization
Europeanisation, National Identities and Migration ... - europeanization
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
3 Enduring nations <strong>and</strong><br />
the illusions of European<br />
integration<br />
John Hutchinson<br />
Introduction<br />
By the Treaty of Maastricht (1992) the nation-states of the European Community<br />
bound themselves to a Union that reaches into many of the core functions of the<br />
nation-state: control of borders <strong>and</strong> territory, the policing of citizens <strong>and</strong> immigration,<br />
currency <strong>and</strong> taxation, management of the economy, <strong>and</strong> foreign policy<br />
<strong>and</strong> defence (Wallace 1997: 33). The nation-state was born in Europe <strong>and</strong> became<br />
through European imperial expansion the global norm. Is Europe now pioneering<br />
a new political form, embodying the principle of multiple sovereignties, that will<br />
supersede the nation-state <strong>and</strong> fit humanity for its postmodern future? Does<br />
Maastricht represent an ‘irreversible move towards real federation’ (Anderson 1997:<br />
126)? Or is it a doomed experiment, likely to intensify the very thing it is designed<br />
to forestall – the resurgence of nationalism at the very heart of the Union?<br />
My subject is the future of nations as political actors in the new Europe. I will<br />
argue that the enduring power of nations is misunderstood because commentators<br />
conflate nation with nation-state, <strong>and</strong> equate the potency of the political nation<br />
with its modernising rather than with its identity functions. Most analysts exaggerate<br />
the contemporary <strong>Europeanisation</strong> of nations, failing to note that being ‘European’<br />
has always been enmeshed with national agendas. The concept of ‘Europe’ is largely<br />
indeterminate, given a common definition only when imposed by the ‘great nationstates’,<br />
<strong>and</strong> as such is unable to inspire a directive <strong>and</strong> solidaristic response in crises<br />
when national interests conflict. What is in doubt is the medium-term viability<br />
of the European Union, not of its constituent nation-states, for the historical record<br />
reveals federations, like empires, have a poor record in the modern world.<br />
The chapter falls into two parts. The first is historical. This examines three<br />
aspects of nations: the basis <strong>and</strong> functions of national identities; the manner in which<br />
European nation-states have tried to regulate political, economic, cultural <strong>and</strong><br />
military processes; <strong>and</strong> how such nations have conceived of their relationships<br />
to Europe. The second part discusses how far the formation of the European<br />
Community represents a fundamental break with the Europe of nation-states, <strong>and</strong><br />
the likely future of nations in the new contexts of monetary union <strong>and</strong> eastwards<br />
expansion.