02.05.2014 Views

Chemical Thermodynamics of Tin - Volume 12 - OECD Nuclear ...

Chemical Thermodynamics of Tin - Volume 12 - OECD Nuclear ...

Chemical Thermodynamics of Tin - Volume 12 - OECD Nuclear ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

260<br />

A Discussion <strong>of</strong> selected references<br />

“Sn(OH) 2 (s)” Sn(OH) 2 (aq); log10 K s,2<br />

≈ − (4.87 ± 0.10) (A.4)<br />

“Sn(OH) 2 (s)” + OH – Sn(OH) − 3 ; log10 K s,3<br />

≈ − (0.34 ± 0.18).<br />

The compound “Sn(OH) 2 (s)” was precipitated from SnCl 2 solutions with<br />

NaOH. The equilibrium constant, K s,2<br />

, <strong>of</strong> Reaction (A.4) was determined by<br />

equilibrating precipitated “Sn(OH) 2 (s)” with H 2 O. The equilibrium concentration <strong>of</strong><br />

Sn(II) was determined by iodometric titration. No attempt was made to characterise<br />

“Sn(OH) 2 (s)” stoichiometrically and/or structurally. Consequently it is not quite<br />

justified to ascribe the value log10 K s,2<br />

((A.5), 298.15 K) = − 4.87 to hexatin<br />

tetrahydroxide tetroxide, Sn 6 (OH) 4 O 4 , as in Reaction (A.5), but lacking any<br />

thermodynamic information on the latter phase it is suggested we do so.<br />

1 6<br />

Sn 6 (OH) 4 O 4 (cr) + 2 3 H 2O(l) Sn(OH) 2 (aq) (A.5)<br />

Garret and Heiks [1941GAR/HEI] reported log10 K s,2<br />

((A.6), 298.15 K) =<br />

− (5.30 ± 0.13) for Reaction (A.6) which differs by 0.43 log 10 units from<br />

log K ((A.5), 298.15 K) although it was obtained by a similar method.<br />

10 s,2<br />

SnO(cr) + H 2 O(l) Sn(OH) 2 (aq)<br />

(A.6)<br />

It is again not quite justified to ascribe this difference to Reaction (A.7), but<br />

ο<br />

Δ rGm<br />

((A.7), 298.15 K) = − (2.45 ± 1.05) kJ·mol –1 is at least qualitatively in line with<br />

the observation that white “Sn(OH) 2 (s)” transforms spontaneously into blue-black<br />

SnO(cr)<br />

1 6<br />

Sn 6 (OH) 4 O 4 (cr) SnO(cr) + 1 3 H 2O(l). (A.7)<br />

For Reaction (A.8) or (A.9)<br />

“Sn(OH) 2 (s)” + OH – Sn(OH) −<br />

3<br />

1 6<br />

Sn 6 (OH) 4 O 4 (cr) + OH – + 2 3 H 2O(l) Sn(OH) −<br />

3<br />

(A.8)<br />

(A.9)<br />

leading to * K s,3<br />

the sum <strong>of</strong> the stoichiometric coefficients <strong>of</strong> the participating ionic<br />

species vanishes, Σ ν B = 0 , see Eq. (II.38).<br />

Thus * K s,3<br />

does not need to be converted when the composition scale is<br />

changed from molarity to molality. Moreover, Δz 2 = 0 for Reactions (A.8) and (A.9) and<br />

thus the Debye-Hückel term vanishes and likewise in the course <strong>of</strong> ionic strength<br />

*<br />

corrections. In Figure A-3 log10 K s,3<br />

(A.9) is plotted vs. m +<br />

Na<br />

. The range <strong>of</strong> sodium<br />

ion concentrations covered by the experiments is too narrow to allow a reliable<br />

estimation <strong>of</strong> Δε.<br />

* ο<br />

The mean value <strong>of</strong> log10 K s,3<br />

(A.9) is (0.50 ± 0.18) log 10 units higher than<br />

* ο<br />

log10 K s,3<br />

evaluated from [1941GAR/HEI] which refers to SnO(cr). This leads to<br />

ο<br />

Δ rGm<br />

((A.7), 298.15 K) = − (2.85 ± 1.03) kJ·mol –1 which agrees surprisingly with the<br />

value (− (2.45 ± 0.91) kJ·mol –1 ) derived from comparison <strong>of</strong> log10 K s,2<br />

values for<br />

Reactions (A.5) and (A.6), although in the experiments <strong>of</strong> [1906GOL/ECK] an<br />

CHEMICAL THERMODYNAMICS OF TIN, ISBN 978-92-64-99206-1, © <strong>OECD</strong> 20<strong>12</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!