02.05.2014 Views

Chemical Thermodynamics of Tin - Volume 12 - OECD Nuclear ...

Chemical Thermodynamics of Tin - Volume 12 - OECD Nuclear ...

Chemical Thermodynamics of Tin - Volume 12 - OECD Nuclear ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

A Discussion <strong>of</strong> selected references<br />

291<br />

later re-evaluated by Rabideau and Moore [1961RAB/MOO] who rejected the<br />

formation <strong>of</strong> hydroxido complexes [1961RAB/MOO]. Moreover, Tobias and Hugus<br />

[1961TOB/HUG] demonstrated experimentally, that in the solutions with [H + ] tot = 0.05<br />

to 0.5 M no hydrolysis <strong>of</strong> tin(II) should be considered [1961TOB/HUG].<br />

The constants <strong>of</strong> the reactions<br />

Sn 2+ + H 2 O(l) SnOH + + H +<br />

SnOH + + Cl – Sn(OH)Cl<br />

were evaluated from the variation <strong>of</strong> the cell data with acidity, and were recalculated on<br />

the basis <strong>of</strong> the data given in Table 2 [1952VAN/RHO], the results could be reproduced<br />

only approximately. As the total Sn 2+ concentration was not varied polynuclear complex<br />

formation cannot be excluded. The experimental data were explained with 5 complex<br />

formation constants, i.e. for SnOH + , Sn(OH)Cl, SnCl + , SnCl 2 , SnCl − 3 . The values for<br />

the formation constants <strong>of</strong> SnOH + and Sn(OH)Cl can only be regarded as tentative.<br />

Therefore, the experimental data reported in [1952VAN/RHO] were reevaluated<br />

for the purposes <strong>of</strong> this review assuming that the differences between the<br />

measurements performed at different [H + ] tot concentrations are due to some unknown<br />

experimental errors. Due to the replacement <strong>of</strong> NaClO 4 by both HClO 4 and NaCl, up to<br />

37% <strong>of</strong> the background electrolyte was substituted during the measurements. Although<br />

no apparent medium effect was observed by [1961TOB/HUG] under similar conditions,<br />

considering the above mentioned unknown experimental errors an uncertainty <strong>of</strong> ± 0.3<br />

has been assigned to the recalculated log10<br />

β<br />

q<br />

values (see Table VIII-9).<br />

The temperature dependence <strong>of</strong> the formation constants allowed us to calculate<br />

2−q<br />

the reaction enthalpy for the formation <strong>of</strong> SnCl (q = 1, 2, 3) complexes:<br />

q<br />

Sn 2+ + q Cl – 2 q<br />

SnCl<br />

− . (A.27)<br />

q<br />

From the plot in Figure A-16, Δ<br />

rH<br />

m((A.27), q = 1) = (9.8 ± 1.0) kJ·mol –1 ,<br />

Δ<br />

rHm((A.27), q = 2) = (14.1 ± 2.0) kJ·mol –1 and Δ<br />

rHm((A.27), q = 3) =<br />

(17.2 ± 4.0) kJ·mol –1 can be derived.<br />

[1953HUM/OBR]<br />

The enthalpies <strong>of</strong> formation <strong>of</strong> tin(II) oxide and tin(IV) oxide at 298.16 K were<br />

determined by combustion calorimetry <strong>of</strong> Reactions (A.28) and (A.29) at 303.16 K.<br />

β-Sn + O 2 (g) SnO 2 (cr)<br />

SnO(cr) + 0.5 O 2 (g) SnO 2 (cr)<br />

(A.28)<br />

(A.29)<br />

The authors were careful in synthesising the SnO sample, and their final<br />

sample was heated in hydrogen at 220 to 256 °C for 4 hours. The product after this<br />

treatment gave w SnO = 99.5%, w HO 2 = 0.18% and w CO2<br />

= 0.10%, leaving 0.15%<br />

undetermined. There was evidence <strong>of</strong> the presence <strong>of</strong> Sn(IV) oxide which probably<br />

CHEMICAL THERMODYNAMICS OF TIN, ISBN 978-92-64-99206-1, © <strong>OECD</strong> 20<strong>12</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!