Chemical Thermodynamics of Tin - Volume 12 - OECD Nuclear ...

B.3 4BTables of ion interaction coefficients
475
Table B-5: (continued)
j k ε(j,k) Comments
2
UO 2(CO 3) 2 Li + —
Na + − 0.02 ± 0.09 These values differ from those reported in [1992GRE/FUG].
K + —
See the discussion in [1995GRE/PUI]. Values for
HCO −
are based on [1980CIA].
3
2
(UO ) (OH) (SO ) − Li + 2 2 2 4 2
—
Na + − 0.14 ± 0.22 Evaluated in Section 9.5.1.1.2 of [2003GUI/FAN].
K + —
2
CO −
and
3
2
ThF − Li + —
6
Na + − 0.30 ± 0.06 See Table VIII-8 in Section VIII.1.2.1 of [2008RAN/FUG].
K + —
2
Th(SO ) − 4 3
Li + − 0.068 ± 0.003 In combination with ε 2 = (0.093 ± 0.007).
Na + − 0.091 ± 0.038
K + − 0.091 ± 0.038
See Section IX.1.3.2 of [2008RAN/FUG].
2
Th(OH) 2 (CO 3 ) − 2 Li + —
Na + – 0.1 ± 0.2 See Section XI.1.3.2 of [2008RAN/FUG].
K + —
2
Th(OH) 4 (CO 3 ) − Li + —
Na + – 0.1 ± 0.2 See Section XI.1.3.2 of [2008RAN/FUG].
K + —
2
Mg(ox) − 2
Li + —
Na + – 0.15 ± 0.03 Estimated in Section VI.5.1 of [2005HUM/AND].
K + – 0.15 ± 0.10 Estimated in [2005HUM/AND], Section VI.5.1 by assuming
+ 2− + 2−
ε(K , Mg(ox) 2 ) ≈ ε(Na , Mg(ox) 2 ) .
2
Mg(edta) − Li + —
Na + – 0.01 ± 0.15 Evaluated in Section VIII.5.2 of [2005HUM/AND].
K + —
2
Ca(ox) − 2
Li + —
Na + – 0.15 ± 0.10 Estimated in [2005HUM/AND], Section VI.5.2 by assuming
+ 2− + 2−
ε(Na ,Ca(ox) 2 ) ≈ ε(Na ,Mg(ox) 2 ) .
K + – 0.15 ± 0.10 Estimated in [2005HUM/AND], Section VI.5.2 by assuming
+ 2− + 2−
ε(K ,Ca(ox) 2 ) ≈ ε(Na , Mg(ox) 2 ) .
3
cit − Li + – 0.44 ± 0.15†
Na + –0.076 ± 0.030†
K + 0.02 ± 0.02 Evaluated in Section VI.3.6 of [2005HUM/AND].
(Continued on next page)
CHEMICAL THERMODYNAMICS OF TIN, ISBN 978-92-64-99206-1, © OECD 2012