14.05.2014 Views

Draft EIS/EIR for the San Luis Reservoir SRA Resource ...

Draft EIS/EIR for the San Luis Reservoir SRA Resource ...

Draft EIS/EIR for the San Luis Reservoir SRA Resource ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4. Plan Overview<br />

Alternative 4 would provide additional facilities along <strong>the</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>rn part of <strong>San</strong><br />

<strong>Luis</strong> <strong>Reservoir</strong> in areas that were envisioned <strong>for</strong> development in earlier planning<br />

documents (see Section 3.1 and Appendix A, Table A-1) but never developed.<br />

Due to its steep topography, <strong>the</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>rn part of <strong>San</strong> <strong>Luis</strong> <strong>Reservoir</strong> (Lone Oak<br />

Bay and Portuguese Creek) can be subject to extreme water level fluctuations that<br />

are not compatible with boat-in camping and day use. There<strong>for</strong>e, Alternative 4<br />

includes access and facility development that is limited to landside areas in <strong>the</strong><br />

BC Zone: a group picnic facility with shade ramadas at Quien Sabe Point,<br />

accessible by foot, bike, or horseback; a campground at Golden Eye with up to 25<br />

tent sites; a backpackers campground at Harper Lane with up to 10 tent sites; and<br />

an equestrian camp and primitive trail access camping at Coyote Springs (see<br />

Map 11). The additional visitor access and facilities are not of a magnitude that<br />

would merit changing <strong>the</strong> BC Zone designation to FC. However, <strong>the</strong> visibility of<br />

additional visitors and facilities from <strong>the</strong> water surface in this relatively isolated<br />

area would result in a change in WROS zone from RN6 (with Alternatives 1, 2,<br />

and 3) to RD5, reflecting a greater overall degree of development. Accordingly,<br />

this WROS designation accommodates a greater target boat density <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

sou<strong>the</strong>rn part of <strong>San</strong> <strong>Luis</strong> <strong>Reservoir</strong>: 20 to 50 acres per boat <strong>for</strong> RD Zones<br />

compared with 50 to 110 acres per boat <strong>for</strong> Rural Natural.<br />

At Dinosaur Point, Alternative 4 proposes to expand <strong>the</strong> existing four-lane boat<br />

launch, allow <strong>for</strong> construction of a marina, and provide <strong>for</strong> concessions. In<br />

addition to adding 30 tent campsites (as with Alternative 3), Alternative 4 would<br />

allow primitive boat-in and trail access camping at Whistler Point to <strong>the</strong> south,<br />

and boat-in, low-impact day use such as picnicking and hiking at Honker Bay to<br />

<strong>the</strong> north (see Map 11). Like Alternatives 2 and 3, Alternative 4 would allow<br />

street luge events with permission from CSP.<br />

Alternative 4 would include some features proposed in Alternative 3 at <strong>San</strong> <strong>Luis</strong><br />

Creek Use Area. It would construct a new boarding float and ADA-accessible<br />

fishing pier, upgrade or replace <strong>the</strong> lifeguard stand, allow <strong>for</strong> connecting paved<br />

paths, explore concession opportunities, expand <strong>the</strong> boat launch, provide a<br />

multipurpose building <strong>for</strong> group events and interpretive programs, and add up to<br />

30 tent sites on <strong>the</strong> northwest shoreline. However, Alternative 4 would also allow<br />

<strong>for</strong> construction of a marina and a separate launch area <strong>for</strong> personal watercraft.<br />

Like Alternative 3, Alternative 4 would provide up to five additional group picnic<br />

facilities at day use areas, but instead of two picnic areas <strong>for</strong> groups of 45-60<br />

people each, Alternative 4 would include four such group picnic areas. In addition<br />

to <strong>the</strong> multipurpose building <strong>for</strong> group events and interpretive programs<br />

(Alternatives 2 and 3), Alternative 4 would provide an amphi<strong>the</strong>ater in <strong>the</strong> North<br />

Beach area. This alternative would also add two group campsites <strong>for</strong> up to 100<br />

campers each, add up to 30 cabins or yurts with utilities, and in <strong>the</strong> Grant Line<br />

area on <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>ast side of O’Neill Forebay, allow boat-in primitive camping<br />

(Grant Line can only be accessed by boat). Some additional facilities could be<br />

sited in <strong>the</strong> extreme northwest corner of <strong>the</strong> use area, beyond <strong>the</strong> <strong>San</strong> <strong>Luis</strong> Creek<br />

campground. As with Alternative 3, Alternative 4 would have a WROS<br />

designation of S3 <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> western part of O’Neill Forebay (compared with S4 <strong>for</strong><br />

<strong>San</strong> <strong>Luis</strong> <strong>Reservoir</strong> <strong>SRA</strong> 4-67<br />

<strong>Draft</strong> RMP/GP and <strong>Draft</strong> <strong>EIS</strong>/<strong>EIR</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!