14.05.2014 Views

Draft EIS/EIR for the San Luis Reservoir SRA Resource ...

Draft EIS/EIR for the San Luis Reservoir SRA Resource ...

Draft EIS/EIR for the San Luis Reservoir SRA Resource ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3. Planning Influences<br />

available data is integral to planning <strong>for</strong> future uses and activities and to<br />

determine <strong>the</strong> best management strategy <strong>for</strong> such resources at this programmatic<br />

phase of <strong>the</strong> planning process. Additionally, it is necessary to comply with<br />

Section 106 of <strong>the</strong> NHPA, NEPA and CEQA during Plan implementation. All<br />

actions taken pursuant to <strong>the</strong> Plan shall be planned and implemented in<br />

coordination with Reclamation’s Mid-Pacific Region Division of Environmental<br />

Affairs Cultural <strong>Resource</strong>s staff. At that time, once specific projects/undertakings<br />

are planned, targeted studies can be conducted to avoid or minimize impacts to<br />

significant cultural resources.<br />

Opportunities<br />

• Better public accessibility to cultural collections and to interpret additional<br />

aspects of cultural resources.<br />

• Collaboration with SHPO to prepare a programmatic agreement <strong>for</strong><br />

cultural resources that would include appropriate individual review <strong>for</strong><br />

future projects.<br />

Constraints<br />

• Best management actions have not been established <strong>for</strong> protecting<br />

significant cultural resources at <strong>the</strong> site (unevaluated resources are treated<br />

as significant).<br />

• Lack of adequate facilities <strong>for</strong> storage, preservation, and display of<br />

collections.<br />

3.4.1.2 Vegetation and Wetlands Management<br />

A vegetation and wetlands inventory does not exist <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> Plan Area. To<br />

understand what resources are needed <strong>for</strong> vegetation management, how visitor<br />

uses affect vegetation, and how to protect certain vegetative resources, habitat<br />

communities should be mapped. Future management actions and tools should be<br />

devised to allow ample protection and to comply with CEQA. Additionally,<br />

invasive species have been identified as a threat in <strong>the</strong> upland and aquatic areas of<br />

<strong>the</strong> unit. Grazing occurs at <strong>the</strong> Medeiros portion of O’Neill Forebay, and if it<br />

continues, <strong>the</strong> effects of this activity should undergo NEPA and CEQA analysis<br />

prior to renewal of <strong>the</strong> grazing lease. Active vegetation management programs are<br />

in place, such as <strong>the</strong> weed abatement program at O’Neill Forebay. Vegetation<br />

management should be consistent with <strong>the</strong> National Fire Plan.<br />

Opportunities<br />

• Establishment of a comprehensive vegetation and wetlands inventory as a<br />

result of mapping habitat communities.<br />

• Identification and control of invasive species in <strong>the</strong> upland and aquatic<br />

areas of <strong>the</strong> Plan Area.<br />

Constraints<br />

• Known problem areas, such as invasive species are not defined and have<br />

not been mapped.<br />

<strong>San</strong> <strong>Luis</strong> <strong>Reservoir</strong> <strong>SRA</strong> 3-23<br />

<strong>Draft</strong> RMP/GP and <strong>Draft</strong> <strong>EIS</strong>/<strong>EIR</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!