Draft EIS/EIR for the San Luis Reservoir SRA Resource ...
Draft EIS/EIR for the San Luis Reservoir SRA Resource ...
Draft EIS/EIR for the San Luis Reservoir SRA Resource ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
5. Environmental Analysis<br />
− Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an<br />
existing or projected air quality violation;<br />
− Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria air<br />
pollutant <strong>for</strong> which <strong>the</strong> project region is nonattainment under an<br />
applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including<br />
releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds <strong>for</strong> ozone<br />
precursors);<br />
− Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations; or<br />
- Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people.<br />
5.4.2.3 Environmental Evaluation<br />
Criteria Pollutant Emissions from Motorized Vehicles and Vessels Vehicle<br />
and motorized watercraft emissions include ozone precursors, carbon monoxide,<br />
nitrogen and sulfur oxides, and particulate matter. These emissions have <strong>the</strong><br />
potential to affect local and regional air quality. The action alternatives would<br />
support increased visitor use, associated vehicle travel, and motorized watercraft<br />
use, as well as construct visitor, operations, and maintenance facilities. The action<br />
alternatives could also result in increased vehicle traffic to, from, and in <strong>the</strong> Plan<br />
Area.<br />
The level of <strong>the</strong> potential increase in motorized vehicle and vessel use is unclear,<br />
since Plan Area visitation has fluctuated in recent years independent of local and<br />
regional population growth (see Chart 2-1). Future criteria pollutant emissions<br />
related to Plan Area motorized vehicle and vessel use were estimated using <strong>the</strong><br />
CARB EMFAC 2007 and Offroad 2007 models, respectively. The modeling<br />
assumed a 98 percent increase in daily vehicle trips and boat launches in future<br />
year 2040 over existing conditions (Section 2.5.2 and Table 2-15). The increase<br />
was based on <strong>the</strong> Cali<strong>for</strong>nia Department of Finance’s projected population<br />
increase of 98 percent in 2040 <strong>for</strong> Merced County (DOF 2011). Applying this<br />
increase to Plan Area vehicle and vessel use is considered highly conservative.<br />
<strong>San</strong>ta Clara County, which is <strong>the</strong> source of at least a portion of Plan Area<br />
visitation, 8 is projected to have a 2040 population increase of only 21 percent. In<br />
addition, <strong>the</strong> 98 percent increase assumes that Plan Area visitation will nearly<br />
double.<br />
8 CSP does not have data <strong>for</strong> county of visitor origin, but because <strong>San</strong>ta Clara County is adjacent<br />
to <strong>the</strong> western side of <strong>the</strong> Plan Area, it is reasonable to assume that some vistors come from that<br />
county.<br />
5-18 <strong>San</strong> <strong>Luis</strong> <strong>Reservoir</strong> <strong>SRA</strong><br />
<strong>Draft</strong> RMP/GP and <strong>Draft</strong> <strong>EIS</strong>/<strong>EIR</strong>