Draft EIS/EIR for the San Luis Reservoir SRA Resource ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Appendix C. Public Involvement Program are many archaeological sites that are in the Valley where the reservoir exists now. She also noted that there are endangered species in the vicinity of the project area including the kit fox and the red-legged frog which will require coordination with US Fish and Wildlife Service. Mary Stokes noted that the power plant tour is very popular and water related interpretive programs are in demand. She noted that since some tours ended after 9/11, it would be great if there were some other location where an old turbine could be placed to tell the story of the water pumping. A brief discussion ensued about the Romero Visitor's Center and that DWR manages that for interpretive and educational information. It was suggested that Mary contact Sara Betterridge about any future programs. Bob Epperson asked Mandeep Bling from DWR about the use of the quarry. Mandeep noted that the quarry has been set aside for future rock reserves should they be needed for the dam. Bob noted perhaps the area should be cordoned off from access as presently it is possible to gain access to the area. A discussion ensued as to who has management authority over certain areas of the SM. Donna noted that there has been a summary compiled all the legal agreements between Reclamation and the various agencies that have land or management jurisdiction in the SM. Bob noted that the agreement about the quarry was not in the legal agreements that he had. Tom Young noted that the letter that DWR submitted as part of the scoping process included a provision about how the rangers should be trained to deal with a variety of enforcement issues outside of just recreation-related violations but that DWR keeps limiting access to certain areas within the SRA which makes it harder for them. He noted that perhaps there can be a joint access system, such as a common key or combination lock that both agencies can utilize. Dave Gould asked if DWR staff knew of any agreements for cattle grazing north of SR 152 where currently, the cattle graze right to the edge of the water. Mandeep did not know of any but said he would look into the matter. The matter of cattle grazing shifted to Los Banos where the question also arose about the rights at the water's edge there. Mandeep noted that he thought there was a lease in that area. Joanne Karlton noted that DPR has a continual fence maintenance problem in that area. Donna concluded that if there were no more comments or questions, there is always an opportunity to contact her directly on behalf of DPR or others who are noted on the contact list provided. C-27 San Luis Reservoir SRA Draft RMP/GP and Draft EIS/EIR
Appendix C. Public Involvement Program Meeting Agenda: February 20, 2003, Scoping Meeting CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION AND US BUREAU OF RECLAMATION SCOPING MEETING FOR SAN LUIS RESERVOIR STATE RECREATION AREA JOINT GENERAL PLAN and RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN & EIR/EIS Thursday, February 20, 2003 Four Rivers District Headquarters Gonzaga Road 1:00 p.m. - 3:00 p.m. ______________________________________________________________________________ 1:00-1:15 p.m. - Sign-In and Introduction Team Overview - Four Rivers District Department of Fish & Game, Department of Water Resources, Bureau of Reclamation, Consultants (Dave Gould, Acting Superintendent; Four Rivers District) 1:15-1:30 p.m. - Planning Process Overview & Public Participation General Plan - Resource Management Plan & Environmental Impact Report/Statement (Donna Plunkett EDAW) 1:30-2:00 p.m. - Project Overview San Luis Reservoir State Recreation Area Joint General Plan and Resource Management Plan & EIR/EIS - General History (Bob Epperson, US Bureau of Reclamation) - Recreation Overview (Dave Gould, Acting Superintendent Four Rivers District) - Interpretive Overview (Mary Stokes, Interpretive Specialist, Four Rivers District) - Natural Resources Overview (Joanne Karlton, Biologist Four Rivers District) - Cultural Resources Overview (Warren Wulzen, Archeologist Four Rivers District) 2:00-2:45 p.m. - Question & Answer Public Comment Period (written comment cards are available if you do not wish to speak) 2:45-3:00 p.m. Conclusions & Next Steps San Luis Reservoir SRA C-28 Draft RMP/GP and Draft EIS/EIR
Page 1 and 2:
3. Planning Influences 3 Planning I
Page 3 and 4:
3. Planning Influences − Californ
Page 5 and 6:
3. Planning Influences The Statewid
Page 7 and 8:
3. Planning Influences Valley Initi
Page 9 and 10:
3. Planning Influences 3.2.5 Cal Fi
Page 11 and 12:
3. Planning Influences 3.3.1.3 Open
Page 13 and 14:
3. Planning Influences Community Pl
Page 15 and 16:
3. Planning Influences needs and de
Page 17 and 18:
3. Planning Influences measures wou
Page 19 and 20:
3. Planning Influences Southern Cal
Page 21 and 22:
3. Planning Influences Use Area. Re
Page 23 and 24:
3. Planning Influences available da
Page 25 and 26:
3. Planning Influences 3.4.1.5 Scen
Page 27 and 28:
3. Planning Influences • A marina
Page 29 and 30:
3. Planning Influences increased mi
Page 31 and 32:
3. Planning Influences Constraints
Page 33 and 34:
3. Planning Influences Constraints
Page 35 and 36:
4. Plan Overview 4 Plan Overview Th
Page 37 and 38:
4. Plan Overview continuing to enco
Page 39 and 40:
4. Plan Overview 4.2.1.1 Scenic/Aes
Page 41 and 42:
4. Plan Overview • Provide for st
Page 43 and 44:
4. Plan Overview Guidelines • Emp
Page 45 and 46:
4. Plan Overview Goal RES-V6 • Id
Page 47 and 48:
4. Plan Overview offering activitie
Page 49 and 50:
4. Plan Overview Goal VIS-T1 • Pr
Page 51 and 52:
4. Plan Overview Guidelines • Con
Page 53 and 54:
4. Plan Overview • Secondary Inte
Page 55 and 56:
4. Plan Overview coordinate plannin
Page 57 and 58:
4. Plan Overview Goal OPS-A2 • Pr
Page 59 and 60:
4. Plan Overview Guidelines • Dev
Page 61 and 62:
4. Plan Overview Goal WA-E1 • Exp
Page 63 and 64:
S4 CSP S
Page 65 and 66:
4. Plan Overview U S RD RN SP P Urb
Page 67 and 68:
4. Plan Overview • Existing Featu
Page 69 and 70:
4. Plan Overview up to fish or be n
Page 71 and 72:
4. Plan Overview motorized boating
Page 73 and 74:
4. Plan Overview The FC Zones were
Page 75 and 76:
4. Plan Overview South of O’Neill
Page 77 and 78:
4. Plan Overview All three action a
Page 79 and 80:
4. Plan Overview Table 4-1 Proposed
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
4. Plan Overview after 2014, a wate
Page 87 and 88:
S4 CSP S
Page 89 and 90:
4. Plan Overview that are indigenou
Page 91 and 92:
4. Plan Overview remain accessible
Page 93 and 94:
Work with DFG to reduce conflicts w
Page 95 and 96:
4. Plan Overview additions would be
Page 97 and 98:
4. Plan Overview relatively small a
Page 99 and 100:
Work with DFG to reduce conflicts w
Page 101 and 102:
4. Plan Overview Alternative 4 woul
Page 103 and 104:
4. Plan Overview Use Area, consiste
Page 105 and 106:
4. Plan Overview Table 4-2 Visitor
Page 107 and 108:
4. Plan Overview in the Plan Area (
Page 109 and 110:
4. Plan Overview Table 4-4 Plan Are
Page 111 and 112:
5 Environmental Analysis 5.1 Introd
Page 113 and 114:
5. Environmental Analysis or Ms. El
Page 115 and 116:
5. Environmental Analysis 5.2.3 Ass
Page 117 and 118:
5. Environmental Analysis 5.2.4.2 G
Page 119 and 120:
5. Environmental Analysis Populatio
Page 121 and 122:
5. Environmental Analysis − Creat
Page 123 and 124:
5. Environmental Analysis Trail and
Page 125 and 126:
5. Environmental Analysis have a on
Page 127 and 128:
5. Environmental Analysis • Incor
Page 129 and 130:
5. Environmental Analysis Table 5-1
Page 131 and 132:
5. Environmental Analysis density i
Page 133 and 134:
5. Environmental Analysis to wildla
Page 135 and 136:
5. Environmental Analysis 5.4.2.4 M
Page 137 and 138:
5. Environmental Analysis discussed
Page 139 and 140:
5. Environmental Analysis • Alter
Page 141 and 142:
5. Environmental Analysis greater t
Page 143 and 144:
5. Environmental Analysis O’Neill
Page 145 and 146:
5. Environmental Analysis • Distu
Page 147 and 148:
5. Environmental Analysis could dis
Page 149 and 150:
5. Environmental Analysis occur at
Page 151 and 152:
5. Environmental Analysis • Groun
Page 153 and 154:
5. Environmental Analysis Alternati
Page 155 and 156:
5. Environmental Analysis Goal RES-
Page 157 and 158:
5. Environmental Analysis 5.4.5.3 E
Page 159 and 160:
5. Environmental Analysis specific
Page 161 and 162:
5. Environmental Analysis recreatio
Page 163 and 164:
5. Environmental Analysis visitor d
Page 165 and 166:
5. Environmental Analysis reduce re
Page 167 and 168:
5. Environmental Analysis When spec
Page 169 and 170:
5. Environmental Analysis major; ho
Page 171 and 172:
5. Environmental Analysis signage t
Page 173 and 174:
5. Environmental Analysis reduce cr
Page 175 and 176:
5. Environmental Analysis plan, in
Page 177 and 178:
5. Environmental Analysis Impact Lo
Page 179 and 180:
5. Environmental Analysis Impact Ta
Page 181 and 182:
5. Environmental Analysis 5.5 NEPA/
Page 183 and 184:
5. Environmental Analysis sensitivi
Page 185 and 186:
5. Environmental Analysis environme
Page 187 and 188:
5. Environmental Analysis Full impl
Page 189 and 190:
5. Environmental Analysis Quinto So
Page 191 and 192:
5. Environmental Analysis Developme
Page 193 and 194:
6 Consultation, Coordination, and D
Page 195 and 196:
6. Consultation, Coordination, and
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
7 References ABAG (Association of B
Page 207 and 208:
7. References Borba, P. 2003.Water
Page 209 and 210:
7. References ———. 2010. iADA
Page 211 and 212:
7. References CSP, Architectural Co
Page 213 and 214:
7. References Archaeological Report
Page 215 and 216:
7. References Kyle, D.E. 2002. Hist
Page 217 and 218:
7. References MWH and Jones & Stoke
Page 219 and 220:
7. References ———. 2011d. San
Page 221 and 222:
7. References ———. 2007. 2007
Page 223 and 224:
7. References ———. 2000. Enda
Page 225 and 226:
8 Glossary of Terms Aesthetics: The
Page 227 and 228:
8. Glossary of Terms Fish and Wildl
Page 229 and 230:
8. Glossary of Terms Runoff: That p
Page 231 and 232:
9 Report Contributors 9.1 Bureau of
Page 233 and 234:
9. Report Contributors 9.5 Consulta
Page 235:
Appendix A Reclamation List of Agre
Page 238 and 239:
Appendix A. Reclamation List of Agr
Page 240 and 241:
Page 242 and 243:
Page 244 and 245: Appendix A. Reclamation List of Agr
Page 256 and 257: This page intentionally left blank
Page 259 and 260: Appendix B. Biological Survey Forms
Page 267: Appendix C Public Involvement Progr
Page 270 and 271: Appendix C. Public Involvement Prog
Page 308: This page intentionally left blank
show all

Draft EIS/EIR for the San Luis Reservoir SRA Resource ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?