14.05.2014 Views

Draft EIS/EIR for the San Luis Reservoir SRA Resource ...

Draft EIS/EIR for the San Luis Reservoir SRA Resource ...

Draft EIS/EIR for the San Luis Reservoir SRA Resource ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4. Plan Overview<br />

Utilities<br />

Table 4-1<br />

Proposed Management Actions by Alternative and Area<br />

Element Alt 1 Alt 2 Alt 3 Alt 4<br />

Upgrade utilities over time to meet current standards. • • • •<br />

Provide <strong>for</strong> additional utility connections to accommodate additional<br />

hookups and electrical demand in areas of new or expanded<br />

development.<br />

Maintain and repair existing lighting.<br />

Maintain and repair existing lighting using energy-efficient fixtures;<br />

add carbon-reducing features such as solar panels to offset carbon<br />

footprint.<br />

•<br />

• •<br />

• • •<br />

Add new lighting as necessary <strong>for</strong> additional development. • •<br />

WATER OPERATIONS<br />

Provide in<strong>for</strong>mation about how to obtain wind and water level<br />

in<strong>for</strong>mation.<br />

• • •<br />

Clarify allowable visitor access to sensitive areas such as dams and<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r water conveyance structures and facilities.<br />

• • • •<br />

Explore engineering solutions <strong>for</strong> shallow areas at low water levels,<br />

including dredging and removal of sandbars.<br />

• •<br />

4.4.1 Alternative 1: No Action/No Project Alternative<br />

NEPA regulations (40 CFR 1502.14(d)) and CEQA Guidelines (Section 15126.6)<br />

require that a No Action (NEPA) and No Project (CEQA) alternative be analyzed<br />

in an <strong>EIS</strong> and an <strong>EIR</strong>, respectively, to allow decision-makers to compare <strong>the</strong><br />

impacts of not approving <strong>the</strong> action with those of approving <strong>the</strong> action.<br />

For Alternative 1, <strong>the</strong> current resource and recreation management direction and<br />

practices in <strong>the</strong> Plan Area would continue unchanged. The management elements<br />

listed <strong>for</strong> Alternative 1 in Table 4-1 are existing, ongoing activities in <strong>the</strong> Plan<br />

Area and represent <strong>the</strong> expected future condition if <strong>the</strong> Plan were not<br />

implemented. The previous plans described in Section 3.1 and Appendix A, Table<br />

A-1 would remain in effect.<br />

Although water and land management zones <strong>for</strong> Alternative 1 are shown in Map<br />

8, <strong>the</strong> proposed Plan would not be implemented, and no Plan measures would be<br />

applied to manage those zones. None of <strong>the</strong> new facilities or focused management<br />

plans identified in <strong>the</strong> action alternatives would be implemented. Utility upgrades<br />

would be necessary over time to adhere to current standards, but no provisions<br />

would be made to accommodate any increase in demand <strong>for</strong> electricity and<br />

potable/drinking water, or to add lighting in <strong>the</strong> Plan Area. The use of<br />

noncon<strong>for</strong>mant two-stroke marine engines would not be phased out.<br />

The existing invasive mussel inspection program in <strong>the</strong> Plan Area, launched by<br />

CSP on October 1, 2011, will continue <strong>for</strong> three years. If no funding is available<br />

4-50 <strong>San</strong> <strong>Luis</strong> <strong>Reservoir</strong> <strong>SRA</strong><br />

<strong>Draft</strong> RMP/GP and <strong>Draft</strong> <strong>EIS</strong>/<strong>EIR</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!