Draft EIS/EIR for the San Luis Reservoir SRA Resource ...
Draft EIS/EIR for the San Luis Reservoir SRA Resource ...
Draft EIS/EIR for the San Luis Reservoir SRA Resource ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
5. Environmental Analysis<br />
use, facility construction or rehabilitation, or development projects, and adverse<br />
impacts can range from negative visual impacts to degradation of water quality to<br />
<strong>the</strong> disturbance or loss of cultural and natural resources.<br />
For <strong>the</strong> purposes of this document only, <strong>the</strong> terms used <strong>for</strong> impact magnitude<br />
(NEPA) and thresholds of significance (CEQA) are shown below. Mitigation<br />
measures are provided where applicable.<br />
NEPA Impact Magnitude<br />
CEQA Threshold<br />
Beneficial –<br />
No impact<br />
No impact<br />
Minor adverse impact<br />
Less than significant impact<br />
Major adverse impact<br />
Significant impact<br />
As discussed above, this Plan is a first-tier <strong>EIS</strong>/<strong>EIR</strong> and, as such, <strong>the</strong> description<br />
of proposed development, program impacts, and associated mitigation are<br />
programmatic. The Plan goals and guidelines (Section 4.2) would provide<br />
program-level avoidance and/or minimization <strong>for</strong> effects that may result from<br />
proposed management actions. Additional program-level mitigation measures are<br />
provided in Section 5.4. As additional area development plans or specific projects<br />
are proposed or developed, <strong>the</strong>y will be subject to fur<strong>the</strong>r environmental review.<br />
Project-specific mitigation measures may be implemented where necessary based<br />
on more specific project review. The potential mitigation measures identified in<br />
this section may be necessary <strong>for</strong> specific projects that could be implemented<br />
under this Plan. Impacts are summarized in Table 5-4, at <strong>the</strong> end of this chapter.<br />
5.2.4 Environmental Effects Found Not to Be Significant<br />
As required by CEQA (CEQA Guidelines §15128), this section presents<br />
discussions related to environmental effects found not to be significant. At this<br />
first tier of planning and environmental analysis, some topical issues were found<br />
not to be significant and were not evaluated fur<strong>the</strong>r in this <strong>Draft</strong> <strong>EIS</strong>/<strong>EIR</strong>. These<br />
topical issues are identified and briefly discussed in this section. If <strong>the</strong> Plan is<br />
amended in <strong>the</strong> future or conditions as presented herein change, <strong>the</strong>se effects will<br />
have to be re-evaluated to ensure that <strong>the</strong>y are still deemed to be not significant.<br />
5.2.4.1 Agricultural and Forest <strong>Resource</strong>s<br />
Implementation of <strong>the</strong> Plan would not convert farmland to nonagricultural use.<br />
The Plan Area is not designated as Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or<br />
Farmland of Statewide Importance pursuant to <strong>the</strong> Farmland Mapping and<br />
Monitoring Program of <strong>the</strong> Cali<strong>for</strong>nia <strong>Resource</strong>s Agency. Thus, <strong>the</strong> proposed Plan<br />
would have no effect on agricultural resources.<br />
No lands in <strong>the</strong> Plan Area are zoned as <strong>for</strong>est land or timberland (Merced County<br />
1990, Merced County Planning and Community Development Department 2008a,<br />
b). The Plan would not result in <strong>the</strong> conversion of <strong>for</strong>est land to non-<strong>for</strong>est use.<br />
5-6 <strong>San</strong> <strong>Luis</strong> <strong>Reservoir</strong> <strong>SRA</strong><br />
<strong>Draft</strong> RMP/GP and <strong>Draft</strong> <strong>EIS</strong>/<strong>EIR</strong>