22.10.2014 Views

Undercover Armies - CIA FOIA - Central Intelligence Agency

Undercover Armies - CIA FOIA - Central Intelligence Agency

Undercover Armies - CIA FOIA - Central Intelligence Agency

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

C05303949<br />

Chapter Ten<br />

Sullivan's Answer to westmorelandD<br />

The action against the North Vietnamese at Plei Me, in the <strong>Central</strong> Highlands,<br />

was not the first test of US ground forces in South Vietnam. As early as<br />

August 1965, the US 7 th Marine Regiment had battled the Viet Cong I" Regiment<br />

in the first major American combat action against the communists in<br />

South Vietnam. In November, elements of the 1" Cavalry Division engaged<br />

three NVA regiments in a bloody action in the Ia Drang Valley in the <strong>Central</strong><br />

Highlands. US firepower turned the balance in both these actions, but Hanoi<br />

continued to pour reinforcements down the Ho Chi Minh TraiJ.30<br />

Ambassador Sullivan despaired of closing the trail complex with any foreseeable<br />

concentration of forces, even including the three-division task force<br />

earlier suggested for deployment along Route 9. Such a move, in his view,<br />

would "do nothing more than spread a thin picket of men along horrendous<br />

terrain, and expose them ... to the bloodletting of concentrated enemy attacks<br />

at places and times of the enemy's choosing." Instead, Sullivan proposed a US<br />

amphibious invasion of the Vietnamese Panhandle, cutting North Vietnam in<br />

two at Vinh, well above the 17'h parallel, and effectively shutting down the<br />

infiltration of men and supplies to the South. 37 0<br />

Sullivan pointed out that, with 185,000 US troops already in South Vietnam,<br />

the idea was much less radical than when first advanced. At least one of<br />

his Washington colleagues agreed: two weeks earlier, Assistant Secretary of<br />

State Bundy had proposed exactly the same thing. But their superiors did not<br />

adopt it; it seems likely that they saw an unacceptable risk of Chinese intervention.<br />

US airstrikes in the Corridor were intensified, but the United States<br />

continued to avoid major escalation. 38 D<br />

The continuation of the status quo generated new tension between the<br />

ambassador and the US military. Sullivan derided SHINING BRASS, the US<br />

Special Forces-run cross-border program, as "an Eagle Scout program," one<br />

whose scheme he had to shoot down because the military hierarchy abdicated<br />

its professional responsibility to disapprove fanciful proposals emanating<br />

from lower levels. And Westmoreland was unhappy with Sullivan. The<br />

ambassador declined to expand the bombing zone along the Trail complex in<br />

36 Harry G Summers, Jr., Vietnam WarAlmanac. Chronology of ground action in South Vietnam<br />

is taken from Summers. unlessotherwise specified.D<br />

)7 Vientiane Embassy Telegram 651,15 December 1965, FRUS /964-/968, 424-26. Concerned<br />

to avoid presenting himself as an amateur strategist, Sullivan attributed theidea to the then JCS<br />

chairman Lyman Lemnitzer, who.in a meeting in McNamara's office ln. 1962.had offered it as a<br />

possible response to a considerably lesser threat. Other US officials, and Sen. Stuart Symington<br />

(D-MO),still thought that bombing wouldbring Hanoi to its knees. (See Vientiane Embassy Telegram<br />

713, 5 January 1965,FRUS /964-/968, 434-36.n<br />

n Information Memorandum From Assistant Secreta;y7State (Bundy) to Secretary of State<br />

Rusk, "Eacalation of US Activities in Laos," 3 December 1965,FRUS /964-/968, 418-20.D<br />

SEC~T/IMR<br />

/224

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!