22.10.2014 Views

Undercover Armies - CIA FOIA - Central Intelligence Agency

Undercover Armies - CIA FOIA - Central Intelligence Agency

Undercover Armies - CIA FOIA - Central Intelligence Agency

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

I<br />

I<br />

C05303949<br />

I Ii<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

i<br />

I<br />

Chapter Four<br />

ratio rising to more than three to one when local militias and the Hmong<br />

irregulars were included. But the Pathet Lao now benefited from the presence<br />

of perhaps as many as 1,500 North Vietnamese advisers and specialists,<br />

and its combat effectiveness had grown in proportion. With the enemy active<br />

on several fronts, Vientiane had no reserves, and the prospect was one of further<br />

reverses. ISD<br />

The unfavorable military balance left Congress and the State Department<br />

hunting for a formula that would preserve a noncommunist Laos while leaving<br />

the ground combat to indigenous forces. A State telegram of 27 April<br />

defined the problem as one of finding a way to stop the communist military<br />

advance without destroying the possibility of a cease-fire and a negotiated<br />

settlement. The Department doubted that the Pathet Lao and the North Vietnamese<br />

sought to conquer all of Laos, but it emphatically disclaimed any certain<br />

knowledge of their intentions. Accordingly, it recommended calling a<br />

UN Security Council meeting to mediate between the Laotian factions while<br />

SEATO troops-no Americans, presumably, among them-moved into Vientiane<br />

and southern Laos.I'D<br />

In another telegram, on 28 April, State continued to wrestle with the issue of<br />

ends and means. Part of the dilemma arose from uncertainty about the intentions<br />

of the Sino-Soviet Bloc, and Washington's call for more intelligence<br />

implied that, whatever the United States might choose to do, it would risk general<br />

war over Laos only with great reluctance. Behind this, finally, lay the question<br />

of the importance to the United States of a noncommunist Laos. State saw<br />

it as contingent in part on the attitudes of Asian governments. "Our national<br />

interest is heavy but [only] part of [the] collective interest in security in Southeast<br />

Asia." If SEATO allies hesitated to participate in collective action, the<br />

United States would have to rethink its responsibilities in the area. For Asian<br />

neutrals as well, the time had come to decide whether the umbrella of US<br />

power required at least their political support in the conflict over Laos. 2 oD<br />

The defense establishment took a harder line. Secretary of Defense<br />

McNamara thought it essential that Laos not become another in the "present<br />

Soviet chain of successes," and that the United States demonstrate its unwillingness<br />

"to concede world leadership to the communists." In a memorandum<br />

to President Kennedy, he and Deputy Defense Secretary Gilpatric recommended<br />

a deadline for the conclusion of a cease-fire. Laos might represent<br />

18Ibid. The JCS figures included. on the government side. a 38,500-man regular army, almost<br />

14.000 militiamen, and 6,000 Hmong guerrillas. The enemy'~es included the 1,500 North<br />

Vietnamese, 4,000 Kong Le neutralists, and 11,000 Pathet Lao.U<br />

"Dean Rusk, Telegram to Department of State, 27 April 1961,FRUS 1961-1963, 147nO<br />

20 Telegram from Secretary Rusk to the Department of State, 28 April 1961, FRUS 1961-1963,<br />

148-49·0<br />

sEcir;TlfMR<br />

7::4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!