22.10.2014 Views

Undercover Armies - CIA FOIA - Central Intelligence Agency

Undercover Armies - CIA FOIA - Central Intelligence Agency

Undercover Armies - CIA FOIA - Central Intelligence Agency

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

C05303949<br />

Appendix<br />

The recollection of Jim Glerum regarding the emergence of narcotics as an<br />

intelligence and enforcement priority differs from that of Larry Devlin by<br />

about a year. Glerum remembered Washington as displaying little interest in<br />

the question' until about 1969 t the first year of the Nixon administration. But<br />

even before that,' Ihad been making a conscious and continuous effort to<br />

stay on top of the subject, mainly to ensure that Hmong or other project units<br />

were not using US assets, especially air transport, to move illicit opium.<br />

rr<br />

The<br />

upcountry units were aware of this interest-case officers were required, for<br />

example, to enforce the prohibition on opium aboard Air America and CASI<br />

planes-and sometime in late 1968 or early 1969,1<br />

rep.orted the progress through Laos of an opium caravan from China. 18<br />

I<br />

Ithought the information detailed and authoritative enough to merit<br />

dissemination, and put it on the wire. Headquarters reacted with a yawn, wondering<br />

in its eval~ation of the report whyDhad even bothered with it.O<br />

Headquarters had expressed no more interest, at the time, in covering Laotian<br />

military involvement in the traffic. Vientiane station I<br />

regarded FAR, from Gen. Ouane Rathikoun on down, as "up to its ears" in the<br />

opium trade. But information on specific transactions, let alone comprehensive<br />

coverage, would have demanded a major clandestine collection effort. At<br />

this point, the topic did not enjoy that high a priority.D<br />

In any case, <strong>CIA</strong> .officers in VientianeI Isaw little chance that the<br />

Hmong could contribute to the heroin traffic even if they wanted to. Highgrade,<br />

No. 4 opium was required for conversion into heroin, and Laotian<br />

opium, in Glerum's understanding, never reached that level. The result was<br />

that most of the Hmong product went to feed the habit of smokers in Laos.<br />

And the volume of Hmong production in any case remained sma11, jith most<br />

of the poppies grown by individual users or petty traffickers. l knew of<br />

just one commercial-scale entrrpri1se, and that was at Bouam Long, in northern<br />

Xieng Khouang Province. ,<br />

In the view of0 officers, the tenacious defense of Bouam Long by<br />

Hmong leader Cher Pao Moua and his irregulars owed something to their<br />

determination not to lose this source of income.l Ialso assumed that the<br />

Bouam Long defenders would exploit any access t~ <strong>CIA</strong>-sponsored liaison<br />

I<br />

18 Material dealing with the emergenceof Nixon administration concern about narcotics. including<br />

Bouam Long and the Nam Yuraid and its aftermath, is from Jim Glerum. Other recollections'<br />

of <strong>CIA</strong> managers and case officers differ on such points as the prevalenceof poppy fields in the<br />

mountains of MR 2. the ultimate size of the Office of Security contingent, the significance of<br />

Burma as a point of originor a destination of drug shipments, the suitabilityof Laotianopium as a<br />

heroin base, and the chronology of the emergingpriorityof the drug traffic as an intelligencetarget.D<br />

'<br />

SE1.~TlfMR<br />

~o

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!