development report 2012 - UMAR
development report 2012 - UMAR
development report 2012 - UMAR
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
114 Development Report <strong>2012</strong><br />
Indicators of Slovenia’s <strong>development</strong><br />
Structure of<br />
merchandise exports<br />
by factor intensity<br />
Slovenia’s gap with EU countries in terms of hightech<br />
exports remains wide. After the remarkable<br />
one-off increase in 2003, 1 the share of high-tech<br />
products in merchandise exports was declining in<br />
2004 and 2005, and then started to grow modestly.<br />
A more visible increase was recorded only in 2008<br />
and 2009 (from 17.4% in 2007 to 21.1% in 2010), in<br />
2009 only due to a considerable shrinkage of exports<br />
of less competitive industries at the beginning of<br />
the economic crisis. Among high-tech products,<br />
pharmaceuticals represent the largest share, as they<br />
were less affected by lower demand in the first period<br />
of the crisis 2 . Amid a gradual recovery of exports of<br />
other product groups, the share of pharmaceuticals,<br />
and hence the share of high-tech products in<br />
Slovenian merchandise exports, declined somewhat<br />
again (by 0.8 p.p.). In the period since the beginning<br />
of the crisis, the relatively wide gap in exports of<br />
the most technology-intensive products between<br />
Slovenia and the EU average narrowed only in 2008;<br />
in the following two years it widened somewhat<br />
again and remains high, close to 7 p.p. Moreover, in<br />
2010 the gap with the average of new EU countries<br />
even rose (by 3 p.p.) to the highest level in the last<br />
decade. The share of medium-high-tech products in<br />
Slovenian merchandise exports also declined slightly<br />
in 2010 (by 0.3 p.p.), on account of lower passenger<br />
car exports 3 after the phase-out of the temporary<br />
incentives for new car purchases in some European<br />
countries. This is the product group where Slovenia<br />
has otherwise the greatest comparative advantages<br />
in exports (see Table).<br />
For a number of years, the importance of products<br />
with low value 4 added in merchandise exports<br />
has been declining primarily due to a lower share<br />
of labour-intensive products. The share of lowtech<br />
products has also shrunk noticeably since<br />
the beginning of the economic crisis. The share of<br />
labour-intensive products dropped further in 2010.<br />
Since Slovenia’s accession to the EU, the share of these<br />
products has been falling rapidly chiefly on account<br />
of the lower shares of textile products, furniture and<br />
paperboard manufactures. The relative volume of<br />
labour-intense products has thus been approaching<br />
the EU average in the last few years. However, in 2010<br />
it was still nearly three percentage points higher than<br />
the EU average and almost one percentage point<br />
higher than the average in the new EU Member States.<br />
Data for 2010 also indicate a further decline in the<br />
share of low-tech products in merchandise exports<br />
(1.2 p.p.), which had been relatively high until 2008.<br />
After several years of growth, the share of exports<br />
of miscellaneous metal products shrank in 2009 and<br />
2010. The decline in 2010 was largely related to a fall<br />
in the share of iron and steel profiles. The share of lowtech<br />
products was thus only 1.6 p.p. higher than the<br />
EU average in 2010.<br />
The share of exports of natural-resource-intensive<br />
products 5 increased markedly in 2010 after being<br />
relatively stable for a number of years. A more<br />
pronounced increase in 2010 (by 1.6 p.p.) was due<br />
to significant growth in the share of electricity and<br />
aluminium exports, most of which was not based on<br />
increased production, according to our estimate. As a<br />
result of significant regional differences in prices and<br />
increased transmission capacity on the Slovenian-<br />
Italian border, electricity transit from Croatia and<br />
Austria to Italy rose substantially in 2010. Owing to<br />
a larger volume of trading, imports and exports of<br />
electricity grew considerably and hence the share of<br />
electricity in merchandise exports, even though net<br />
exports (the difference between exports and imports)<br />
accounted for only slightly more than a fifth of total<br />
electricity exports that year. Due to lower demand,<br />
the volume of primary aluminium production had<br />
dropped to a mere 41% of full capacity in 2009 and<br />
climbed only to 48% in 2010, which leads us to believe<br />
that the significant increase in the share of aluminium<br />
in merchandise exports relative to 2009 was largely<br />
due to higher selling prices. The shares of aluminium<br />
exports in 2009 and 2010 were otherwise much lower<br />
than before 2008.<br />
1<br />
As a result of increased sales of pharmaceuticals to the<br />
American market.<br />
2<br />
In 2008 exports of pharmaceuticals rose by 20.2% in nominal<br />
terms; in 2009 they shrank by 8.4% while in 2010 they increased<br />
by 1.6%.<br />
3<br />
A decline by 1.4 p.p., while the share of other products from<br />
this group was increasing.<br />
4<br />
The groups of low-tech and labour-intensive products include<br />
products with the lowest value added per employee such<br />
as: clothing, textile products, footwear, furniture, glass and<br />
glass products, flat- and rolled-iron products, and base-metal<br />
products.<br />
5<br />
The main groups of exported resource-intensive products in<br />
Slovenia’s merchandise exports are: aluminium, finished mineral<br />
manufactures, electricity, rough and worked wood, veneer and<br />
other manufactured wood, wood manufactures, and nonalcoholic<br />
and alcoholic beverages.