22.10.2014 Views

development report 2012 - UMAR

development report 2012 - UMAR

development report 2012 - UMAR

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Development Report <strong>2012</strong><br />

Appendix<br />

247<br />

Figure 1: Synthetic estimate of Slovenia’s <strong>development</strong> in the 1st<br />

priority (A competitive economy and faster economic growth)<br />

and its main components, and Slovenia’s ranking among 22<br />

EU Member States in terms of <strong>development</strong> according to this<br />

priority, 2005–2010<br />

40<br />

Competitiveness of services<br />

Competitiveness and entrepreneurial <strong>development</strong><br />

Macroeconomic stability<br />

GDP PPS<br />

Ranking according to the 1st priority (right axis)<br />

0<br />

Figure 3: Synthetic estimate of Slovenia’s <strong>development</strong> in the<br />

3rd priority (An efficient and more economical state) and<br />

its main components, and Slovenia’s ranking among 22 EU<br />

Member States in terms of <strong>development</strong> according to this<br />

priority, 2005–2010<br />

5<br />

Efficiency of the judiciary<br />

Institutional competitiveness<br />

General government expenditure<br />

Ranking according to the 3rd priority (rigth axis)<br />

0<br />

20<br />

3<br />

0<br />

3<br />

0<br />

6<br />

-5<br />

6<br />

Attained points<br />

-20<br />

-40<br />

-60<br />

-80<br />

15<br />

16<br />

14<br />

-100<br />

21<br />

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010<br />

Source: calculations by IMAD.<br />

Notes: The columns show the points (<strong>development</strong> estimate) attained according<br />

to individual components, where a positive value represents above-average<br />

<strong>development</strong> relative to the EU countries included in the analysis. Zero points for a<br />

component would therefore mean that in terms of <strong>development</strong> in this component<br />

Slovenia is equal to the average of countries included in the analysis and a negative<br />

value that Slovenia lags behind the average in a certain year.<br />

15<br />

17<br />

20<br />

9<br />

12<br />

15<br />

18<br />

Ranking<br />

Attained points<br />

-10<br />

-15<br />

-20<br />

-25<br />

-30<br />

20<br />

15 17<br />

-35<br />

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010<br />

Source: Calculations by IMAD.<br />

Notes: See Figure 1.<br />

15<br />

16<br />

21<br />

9<br />

12<br />

15<br />

18<br />

21<br />

24<br />

Ranking<br />

Figure 2: Synthetic estimate of Slovenia’s <strong>development</strong> in<br />

the 2 nd priority (Efficient use of knowledge for economic<br />

<strong>development</strong> and high-quality jobs) and its main components,<br />

and Slovenia’s ranking among 22 EU Member States in terms<br />

of <strong>development</strong> according to this priority, 2005–2010<br />

Research and <strong>development</strong>, innovation and use of ICT<br />

Education and training<br />

Ranking according to the 2nd priority (right axis)<br />

0<br />

0<br />

Figure 4: Synthetic estimate of Slovenia’s <strong>development</strong> in the<br />

4th priority (A modern welfare state and higher employment)<br />

and its main components, and Slovenia’s ranking among 22<br />

EU Member States in terms of <strong>development</strong> according to this<br />

priority, 2005–2010<br />

25<br />

Labour market<br />

Living conditions<br />

Social protection<br />

Ranking according to the 4th priority (right axis)<br />

0<br />

-5<br />

2<br />

-10<br />

4<br />

20<br />

3<br />

Attained points<br />

-15<br />

-20<br />

-25<br />

-30<br />

6<br />

8<br />

10<br />

12<br />

Ranking<br />

Attained points<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

12<br />

13<br />

8<br />

10<br />

9<br />

11<br />

6<br />

9<br />

Ranking<br />

12<br />

-35<br />

-40<br />

13 13<br />

14<br />

14 14 14<br />

14<br />

16<br />

0<br />

15<br />

-45<br />

18<br />

-5<br />

18<br />

-50<br />

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010<br />

Source: Calculations by IMAD.<br />

Notes: See Figure 1.<br />

20<br />

-10<br />

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010<br />

Source: Calculations by IMAD.<br />

Notes: See Figure 1.<br />

21

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!