22.10.2014 Views

development report 2012 - UMAR

development report 2012 - UMAR

development report 2012 - UMAR

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

160 Development Report <strong>2012</strong><br />

Indicators of Slovenia’s <strong>development</strong><br />

Economic structure of<br />

taxes and contributions<br />

A comparison of the economic structures of taxation<br />

systems 1 shows that Slovenia diverges from the EU<br />

average in its higher tax burden on consumption and<br />

labour and a lower burden of capital. The share of<br />

taxes on consumption in total taxes and contributions<br />

totalled 37.3% in Slovenia in 2009 and exceeded the<br />

EU average (33.4%). In terms of the share of taxes on<br />

consumption in total taxes Slovenia is in the top third<br />

of EU countries, as in 2009 only eight countries had a<br />

higher share. The share of taxes on labour (52.0%) was<br />

also above the EU average (48.0%). Slovenia is also<br />

ranked in the upper half of the EU on this indicator,<br />

with a higher share recorded in only ten Member<br />

States. The share of taxes on capital accounted for<br />

just 11.0% of all taxes and contributions in Slovenia in<br />

2009, which is a much lower figure than in the EU as a<br />

whole (18.8%). With regard to the share of these taxes<br />

in total taxes, Slovenia is at the tail-end of the EU, with<br />

only Estonia and Latvia trailing behind.<br />

In 2009, the gap in the economic structure of taxes<br />

between Slovenia and the EU average narrowed<br />

relative to 2000. In Slovenia, the otherwise very low<br />

share of taxes on capital in total taxes and contributions<br />

grew, while the average share in the EU declined.<br />

After 2005, Slovenia recorded a more pronounced<br />

increase in the tax burden on capital, particularly<br />

in 2007 when the conditions for capital gains were<br />

favourable and the rate of corporate income tax was<br />

still high (25%), with no significant tax relief. In 2007,<br />

income tax recorded a ten-year high. Following the<br />

tax reform in 2007 the burden on capital started to<br />

decline again. The decline was due to a gradual phasedown<br />

of the corporate income tax rate (from 25% to<br />

20% in 2010), higher tax relief and changes in the<br />

personal income tax. Meanwhile, the macroeconomic<br />

situation deteriorated. Although the burden on<br />

capital has been declining since 2007, in 2009 it was<br />

still higher than in 2000. The tax burden on labour in<br />

the overall tax burden decreased in Slovenia, while<br />

growing slightly in the EU as a whole. Slovenia has a<br />

higher tax burden on labour than other EU countries<br />

mainly because of high social security contributions.<br />

Slovenia is fifth among EU Member States regarding<br />

social security contributions as a share of GDP; only<br />

France, Germany, the Czech Republic and Austria<br />

have higher shares. After the tax reform in 2007, the<br />

burden on labour otherwise declined somewhat due<br />

to changes in the personal income tax and a gradual<br />

phasing out of the payroll tax, but is still higher than<br />

the EU average. The share of taxes on consumption<br />

in total taxes and contributions increased slightly<br />

both in Slovenia and the EU. It was fairly stable in<br />

the entire period. After 2002, it had risen somewhat<br />

due to a higher value added tax rate, while in the<br />

following years it was mainly impacted by changes in<br />

excise duties, which were being adjusted to meet the<br />

requirements of the EU directives and to compensate<br />

for changes in the prices of excise products and the<br />

shortfall of budgetary revenues during the crisis.<br />

The calculation and comparison of implicit tax<br />

rates 2 also confirm the above-average tax burden<br />

on labour in Slovenia in 2009. In Slovenia, the<br />

implicit tax rate on consumption in 2009 was 24.2%<br />

compared to the EU average of 20.9%. Only seven<br />

Member States, Nordic countries in particular, had<br />

higher rates than Slovenia. In Slovenia the implicit<br />

tax rate on consumption has been dropping since<br />

2003, while increasing on average in the EU. In 2009,<br />

the calculated implicit tax rate on labour in Slovenia<br />

was 34.9%, higher than the EU average of 32.9% due<br />

to the relatively high social security contributions.<br />

Twelve Member States had higher rates than Slovenia<br />

in 2009. The implicit tax rate on capital for 2009 for<br />

Slovenia is estimated at 21.0%, below the EU-25 3<br />

average of 24.6%. Nine countries had lower rates than<br />

Slovenia, including the Baltic countries and the Czech<br />

Republic, Hungary, Poland and Slovakia.<br />

1<br />

The tax classification is based on the classification of<br />

taxes according to ESA-95 and the common rules for their<br />

classification. Taxes on consumption are defined as taxes on<br />

transactions between consumers and producers and as taxes<br />

on final consumption. Taxes on labour are directly tied to wages<br />

and paid by employees and employers. Taxes on capital relate<br />

to taxes on capital, corporate income, income from household<br />

capital (annuities, dividends, interests, other income from<br />

property), capital gains, on property, etc.<br />

2<br />

The implicit tax rate on consumption is defined as the<br />

ratio between taxes on consumption and final household<br />

consumption expenditure on the territory of a country<br />

according to the methodology of national accounts. The implicit<br />

tax rate on labour is calculated as the ratio between taxes on<br />

labour and the compensation of employees according to the<br />

methodology of national accounts, increased by taxes on wage<br />

bill and payroll.<br />

3<br />

EU-27 data not available.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!