22.10.2014 Views

development report 2012 - UMAR

development report 2012 - UMAR

development report 2012 - UMAR

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

58 Development Report <strong>2012</strong><br />

Development by the priorities of SDS – A modern welfare state and higher employment<br />

Over the last year, the participation in lifelong learning<br />

dropped, with the rates of participation of the elderly<br />

and low-skilled people remaining particularly low 155 .<br />

The issue of increased labour market segmentation<br />

poses a great challenge in the labour market policy and<br />

the promotion of flexicurity. To deal with this issue, it<br />

would be necessary (i) to reduce substantial differences<br />

in the rights arising from fixed-term and permanent<br />

employment, and (ii) to regulate student work in a<br />

different manner.<br />

4.2. Modernisation of the social<br />

protection systems<br />

Social protection expenditure 156 is increasing, and<br />

so are the problems for funding it. In 2009 (the latest<br />

available data) this expenditure increased by 6.6% 157 in<br />

real terms, which by far exceeded the average recorded in<br />

some previous years (3%). This high increase can largely<br />

be attributed to the growth of pension expenditure (by<br />

7.2%) and the expenditure on various social transfers that<br />

in 2009 began to increase rapidly due to the economic<br />

crisis, as well as to expenditure growth in health care<br />

as a result of the public sector wage reform. Expressed<br />

as a share of GDP, the increase in the social protection<br />

expenditure was also quite substantial (to 24.2% of<br />

GDP, which is almost 3 p.p. more than the year before).<br />

Alongside expenditure growth, this situation was also the<br />

result of a substantial GDP decline in 2009. Since similar<br />

trends were also typical of other EU Member States, the<br />

share of the social protection expenditure continues<br />

to remain substantially below the EU average (29.5%).<br />

Despite the applicability of intervention measures in<br />

2010 and 2011 that restricted the growth of expenditure<br />

for cash allowances under the social protection<br />

programmes 158 , these allowances continued to increase<br />

in real terms owing to further rise in the number of<br />

pensioners and the beneficiaries of certain social<br />

transfers (mostly because of increased unemployment).<br />

Given a modest economic growth, this trend is expected<br />

to result in a further increase in its share against the GDP.<br />

The problems of providing public resources to cover<br />

this expenditure have been escalating year by year.<br />

The volume of transfers from the state budget to the<br />

pension fund to cover pension expenditure is increasing,<br />

while the revenues of the healthcare fund in 2011 did<br />

not suffice to cover current liabilities for the third year<br />

in a row. Out of many systemic changes expected to be<br />

implemented for quite a while, the reform of the system<br />

of means-tested social transfers was the only one that<br />

Slovenia began to implement in <strong>2012</strong>. This reform aims<br />

at achieving more target-oriented transfers which under<br />

the new regulation do not only depend on the income<br />

but also on the property of potential beneficiaries.<br />

Further problems in ensuring stable funding of social<br />

protection expenditure are also indicated by new longterm<br />

economic and budgetary projections related<br />

to population ageing. The European Commission, in<br />

cooperation with the EU Member States, updates the<br />

relevant projections every three years 159 . The most<br />

recent projections of March <strong>2012</strong> do not substantially<br />

differ from the previous ones. They show that without<br />

Table 7: Long-term projections of ageing-related public expenditure, Slovenia and the EU (as % of GDP)<br />

Share of GDP (%)<br />

AWG reference scenario*<br />

Change in p.p. of GDP<br />

Risk scenario<br />

Change in p.p. of GDP<br />

2010 2010–2020 2010–2060 2010–2020 2010–2060<br />

SI EU SI EU SI EU SI EU SI EU<br />

Total 23.5 25 1.7 0.2 10.3 4.1 1.9 0.4 10.8 4.9<br />

Pensions 11.2 11.3 1.0 -0.1 7.1 1.5 NP NP NP NP<br />

Healthcare** 6.1 7.1 0.3 0.3 1.1 1.1 0.5 0.5 1.7 1.7<br />

Long-term care*** 1.4 1.8 0.3 0.2 1.6 1.5 0.3 0.3 1.6 1.8<br />

Education 4.7 4.6 0.1 -0.3 0.5 -0.1 NP NP NP NP<br />

Unemployment benefits 0.3 1.1 0.1 -0.1 0.0 -0.3 NP NP NP NP<br />

Source: European Commission and Economic Policy Committee: Draft <strong>2012</strong> Ageing Report: Economic and budgetary projections for the EU Member States (2010–2060); Ministry<br />

of Finance: Country Fiche on Pension Projections for Slovenia.<br />

Note: *AWG – Ageing Working Group at the Economic Policy Committee. The reference scenario related to healthcare expenditure and long-term care only takes into account the<br />

effects of ageing and the assumption that one half of the remaining years of life we live without disability. **Public expenditure for healthcare according to SHA methodology,<br />

however, without expenditure for long-term care. ***In addition to long-term care public expenditure according to SHA methodology (0.9% of GDP in 2009), AWG projections also<br />

include certain cash benefits according to ESPROSS methodology (disability allowances). NP – no projection.<br />

155<br />

For more details on this topic, see Chapter 2.1. – Education and Training.<br />

156<br />

According to ESSPROS methodology. All social protection expenditure covered by public funds and complementary health insurance<br />

funds is included.<br />

157<br />

The latest data made available by SORS.<br />

158<br />

In 2010 the statutory level of indexation of population's pensions and cash benefits from public sources was cut by half by way of<br />

intervention measures, and in 2011 to one quarter. Expenditure for pensions and social transfers has at the same time been increasing<br />

in real terms by a solid 2% p. a.<br />

159<br />

The drafting of these projections is coordinated at the EC level within the Ageing Working Group at the Economic Policy Committee.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!