22.10.2014 Views

development report 2012 - UMAR

development report 2012 - UMAR

development report 2012 - UMAR

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

80 Development Report <strong>2012</strong><br />

Development by the priorities of SDS – Integration of measures to achieve sustainable <strong>development</strong><br />

Figure 24: Domestic material consumption and resource productivity<br />

50<br />

45<br />

Fossil energy carriers<br />

Non-metallic minerals<br />

Metal ores<br />

Biomass<br />

Resource productivity (right axis)<br />

1.0<br />

0.9<br />

1.8<br />

1.6<br />

1.4<br />

Resource productivity (GDP in PPS)<br />

40<br />

0.8<br />

1.2<br />

In millions of tonnes<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

0.7<br />

0.6<br />

0.5<br />

0.4<br />

In EUR/kg<br />

In EUR in PPS/kg<br />

1.0<br />

0.8<br />

0.6<br />

15<br />

0.3<br />

0.4<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

2000<br />

2001<br />

2002<br />

2003<br />

2004<br />

2005<br />

2006<br />

2007<br />

2008<br />

2009<br />

2010<br />

SI-STAT data portal – Environment, <strong>2012</strong>; SI-STAT data portal – National Accounts, <strong>2012</strong>; Eurostat Portal Page – Environment, <strong>2012</strong>. Calculations by IMAD.<br />

Note: Waste and other products are not shown due to the small size of the categories in the figure (left). PPS – purchasing power standard.<br />

0.2<br />

0.1<br />

0.0<br />

0.2<br />

0.0<br />

2009<br />

EU-27<br />

2009<br />

Slovenia<br />

2010<br />

Slovenia<br />

motorway network 278 . According to SORS data, material<br />

productivity in 2010 improved for the third year in a<br />

row by 7.2% and was thus 23.2% higher than in 2005.<br />

In contrast to before the advent of the crisis, the lower<br />

use of materials was mostly contributed to by a lower<br />

use of construction materials. Data on annual changes<br />

in the scope and structure of the cost of the materials<br />

used during the economic crisis also point to the<br />

rationalisation of the use of raw materials in the majority<br />

of industries.<br />

By devoting more attention to environmental issues in<br />

agricultural policy, the negative impact of agriculture<br />

on the environment is being reduced in the long run,<br />

and was also reduced in 2010, but not according to all<br />

indicators. Slovenian agriculture, which is not ranked<br />

among the more intensive according to international<br />

comparisons 279 , has gradually reduced the environmental<br />

burden in recent years. This is mainly due to the direction<br />

of agricultural policy, according to which the producers’<br />

eligibility for subsidies is conditional upon the compliance<br />

with the prescribed environmental standards. In 2010,<br />

fertilisation with mineral fertilisers increased, but was still<br />

almost a third lower than at the beginning of this decade,<br />

while the overall use of pesticides continued to decrease.<br />

Together with nitrates, residual pesticides constitute the<br />

major source of pollution in agriculture which affects<br />

groundwater and consequently also drinking water. The<br />

monitoring of drinking water quality in Slovenia shows<br />

that at some monitoring stations located near the most<br />

intensive agricultural regions the permissible values of<br />

278<br />

According to the tables of use, the use of non-metallic<br />

materials in civil engineering (e.g. the construction of roads)<br />

is above average in comparison with other construction<br />

activities.<br />

279<br />

Source: Agriculture and fishery statistics, 2011.<br />

individual active substances 280 are still being occasionally<br />

exceeded, however, in general, the situation is relatively<br />

positive and is gradually improving. Agricultural<br />

production intensity, measured by the average yield of<br />

the two most important crops, significantly lags behind<br />

the EU average; it however, increased in 2010. This reveals<br />

a slightly improved exploitation of natural resources,<br />

whereby the scope of agricultural production also<br />

strongly depends on the changing weather conditions<br />

and in the long run also on the climate change. The low<br />

level of national self-sufficiency in basic food products<br />

requires an even more intensive production orientation<br />

which would comply with the adopted adjustment<br />

programme 281 , although its time limit is relatively short.<br />

However, the average milk yield per animal – which is<br />

one of the main indicators in animal exploitation – has<br />

dropped the third year in a row. In Slovenia, the value<br />

of this indicator is also below the EU average, while<br />

from the aspect of environmental pollution per unit of<br />

production, at least a slightly higher level of intensity<br />

would be desirable 282 . In sustainable farming, progress<br />

was made in 2010; however, this progress will not be<br />

sufficient to achieve the set objective. The proportion<br />

of land devoted to organic farming, which is one of the<br />

most effective methods of sustainable use of natural<br />

resources in agriculture and exceeds the EU average due<br />

280<br />

The regions of the Dravsko and Mursko polje and the Savinjska<br />

kotlina are particularly overburdened. Adapted from: Simončič<br />

A. and Sušin J.: Spremljanje in preprečevanje negativnih vplivov<br />

kmetijstva na onesnaževanje voda s fitofarmacevtskimi sredstvi<br />

in nitrati. Celje, 2011.<br />

281<br />

Akcijski načrt strategije prilagajanja slovenskega kmetijstva<br />

in gozdarstva podnebnim spremembam za leti 2010 in 2011<br />

(Action Plan for the Strategy for Adaptation of Slovenian<br />

Agriculture and Forestry to Climate Change in 2010 and 2011).<br />

Government of the Republic of Slovenia, 2008.<br />

282<br />

Source: Verbič J., 2008.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!