07.11.2014 Views

Company Valuation Under IFRS : Interpreting and Forecasting ...

Company Valuation Under IFRS : Interpreting and Forecasting ...

Company Valuation Under IFRS : Interpreting and Forecasting ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Company</strong> valuation under <strong>IFRS</strong><br />

1.5 Case example<br />

It is actually quite difficult to use case studies to illustrate revenue recognition<br />

points as the disclosures under various GAAPs tend to be somewhat limited. The<br />

main issue to look at, as outlined in the paragraph above, is the revenue<br />

recognition policy for the company. To illustrate the point we have reproduced<br />

extracts from the accounting policies of two property companies:<br />

Exhibit 4.6: Property company revenue recognition<br />

Turnover<br />

Turnover represents amounts received <strong>and</strong> receivable in respect of housing,<br />

l<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> commercial property sold <strong>and</strong> amounts receivable in respect of<br />

construction <strong>and</strong> other work completed during the year. Turnover excludes<br />

the sale of properties taken in part exchange. In the case of long term<br />

contracts turnover is recognised on a percentage of completion basis.<br />

Source: Crest Nicholson Annual Report 2003<br />

Profits on Sale of Properties<br />

Profits on sale of properties are taken into account on the completion of<br />

contract. Profits arising from the sale of trading properties acquired with a<br />

view to resale are included in the profit <strong>and</strong> loss account as part of the<br />

operating profit of the group. Profits or losses arising from the sale of<br />

investment properties are calculated by reference to book value at the end<br />

of the previous year, adjusted for subsequent capital expenditure, <strong>and</strong><br />

treated as exceptional items.<br />

Source: Hammerson Directors’ Report <strong>and</strong> Financial Statements 2003<br />

As we can see Hammerson recognises the revenues based on completion whereas<br />

another choice would be on the basis of exchange of contracts. In certain<br />

circumstances these events may be months apart. The absence of detailed rules<br />

leaves the choice to the company. Furthermore Crest Nicholson employs the<br />

‘percentage complete’ methodology for long term contracts. This is consistent<br />

with <strong>IFRS</strong>. <strong>Under</strong> other GAAPs the completed contract method is used. This will<br />

change with the advent of <strong>IFRS</strong>.<br />

We can also see this in the context of a telecoms business such as Deutsche<br />

Telekom below. This policy reflects the basic principle that irrespective of when<br />

the company will actually receive the cash it is the ‘performance’ (called delivery<br />

here) that drives recognition (see bold highlight).<br />

98

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!