07.11.2014 Views

Company Valuation Under IFRS : Interpreting and Forecasting ...

Company Valuation Under IFRS : Interpreting and Forecasting ...

Company Valuation Under IFRS : Interpreting and Forecasting ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter Five – Valuing a company<br />

1.3 Amortisation of intangible assets<br />

The accounting treatment of goodwill is discussed in Chapter seven. Acquisition<br />

of new goodwill will have to await Chapter seven, <strong>and</strong> discussion of mergers <strong>and</strong><br />

acquisitions. For the time being, we are merely concerned with building<br />

intangible assets into our accounting forecasts of a going concern. It follows that<br />

there can be no acquisition of new goodwill in the model. We either amortise<br />

what is in the balance sheet or we do not. As discussed in Chapter four, under<br />

<strong>IFRS</strong> rules there is no amortisation of goodwill after 2004. Notice that<br />

historically amortised goodwill will not be added back into balance sheets, so the<br />

figure that will continue to be carried is the partly amortised amount.<br />

Other intangible assets may be capitalised for one of two reasons. They may be<br />

created as part of the writing up <strong>and</strong> down to fair value of assets assumed as part<br />

of an acquisition. In this case, they may be amortised over their useful lives, or<br />

may be deemed to not to have a determinable life <strong>and</strong> be carried unamortised.<br />

Alternatively, the company may capitalise some of its expenditure on the creation<br />

of patents or br<strong>and</strong>s, in which case they will both be amortised <strong>and</strong> added to by<br />

future investments, <strong>and</strong> will be systematically retired.<br />

Intangible assets of the second kind should be modelled in exactly the same<br />

fashion as tangible assets, with amortisation run off gross fixed assets <strong>and</strong> an<br />

asset life. And it is reasonable to assume retirements in the same way as we did<br />

for tangible fixed assets.<br />

1.4 Changes in working capital<br />

It is most convenient to separate operational from financial items when<br />

modelling companies. We shall therefore treat working capital as comprising<br />

inventory, trade debtors (trade receivables) <strong>and</strong> other non-cash current assets,<br />

minus trade creditors (trade payables) <strong>and</strong> other non-cash current liabilities. Cash<br />

<strong>and</strong> short term debt will be modelled separately as part of financing (though in<br />

Metro’s case the balance sheet shows total debt <strong>and</strong> we have left this<br />

unallocated). This should not be taken to imply, however, that all cash should<br />

automatically be netted off against debt when valuing the equity in a company.<br />

That would be fine if it were really practical to run a company with no cash<br />

whatsoever in its balance sheet, clearly an impossibility. So, when we model the<br />

company’s finances, we shall take minimum operating cash requirements into<br />

account. But we shall treat them as part of the cash <strong>and</strong> debt calculation, <strong>and</strong> keep<br />

them separate from non-cash items.<br />

Working capital used to be referred to by classical economists as ‘circulating<br />

capital’, <strong>and</strong> this is a useful way to conceptualise it. At any one time our company<br />

will have a given stock of goods on its shelves. It will owe its suppliers for that<br />

which has been delivered to it during the credit period under which it buys, <strong>and</strong><br />

183

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!