07.11.2014 Views

Company Valuation Under IFRS : Interpreting and Forecasting ...

Company Valuation Under IFRS : Interpreting and Forecasting ...

Company Valuation Under IFRS : Interpreting and Forecasting ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Company</strong> valuation under <strong>IFRS</strong><br />

1.4.7 Valuing the CCA accounts<br />

Now suppose that you are valuing a company for which the published accounts<br />

are the consolidated CCA figures from page two of Exhibit 6.1. There are a<br />

couple of seductive but horribly wrong things that you could do, <strong>and</strong> we look first<br />

at the wrong <strong>and</strong> then at the right approaches below.<br />

1. An obvious mistake would be to take the net cash flows, grow them in the<br />

terminus at 5 per cent annually, <strong>and</strong> then discount them at a real discount<br />

rate. If we use the 7.5 per cent target CCA return on capital we get a value<br />

for the enterprise of 687.77, which has the merit of being very obviously<br />

wrong!<br />

2. Since how the company accounts cannot alter its cash flows, it follows that<br />

if we are going to value the company by discounting its net cash flows the<br />

discount rate that we should use is the nominal rate of 14.75 per cent, even<br />

if we are applying it to cash flows derived from a CCA model in which the<br />

forecasts have been obtained by assuming a real rate of return on<br />

replacement cost assets.<br />

3. Another superficially attractive way to value the company would be to use<br />

an economic profits model <strong>and</strong> to use a real discount rate. Unfortunately, as<br />

we have seen in page two, the projected returns on capital are in all years<br />

lower than the real discount rate of 9.29 per cent. In fact, running an<br />

economic profit valuation on this basis gives a negative intrinsic value for<br />

the enterprise of -41.11, which again has the sole merit of being obviously<br />

wrong! The culprit is the breakdown in clean value accounting.<br />

Clean value accounting implies that balance sheet growth must equal net<br />

investment, which must equal profit plus negative net cash flow (new capital). So<br />

we have to add back the inflation adjustment, which of course means that the<br />

returns on capital that we derive are again now nominal. Look at page eight. We<br />

are correctly deriving a value of 100 by applying a nominal discount rate of 14.75<br />

per cent to returns that include the inflation adjustment. The pattern of economic<br />

profit is, however, different from that calculated in page five, because the inflation<br />

adjustments are providing a better picture of value creation than the HCA accounts<br />

did, with their straight line depreciation. However, it is still not perfect. We still<br />

have a small negative value creation in the first four years perfectly offset by a<br />

positive terminal value of 1.87. To apply economic profit to CCA accounts you<br />

must include the inflation adjustment in the calculation of NOPAT, <strong>and</strong> then<br />

discount the resulting economic profit at the nominal cost of capital.<br />

1.5 Conclusions for modelling utilities<br />

To explain the accounting <strong>and</strong> modelling points that relate to CCA accounts,<br />

which are not intuitively obvious, we have had to take recourse to a rather simple<br />

company. It has no working capital <strong>and</strong> is entirely funded by equity. Its asset life<br />

258

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!