07.11.2014 Views

Company Valuation Under IFRS : Interpreting and Forecasting ...

Company Valuation Under IFRS : Interpreting and Forecasting ...

Company Valuation Under IFRS : Interpreting and Forecasting ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter Four – Key issues in accounting <strong>and</strong> their treatment under <strong>IFRS</strong><br />

Why in this example do we have a deferred taxation liability? It is because profits<br />

in year 1 have only been reduced by a £20,000 depreciation charge whereas<br />

taxable profits have suffered a £150,000 deduction. This means that taxable<br />

income would £130,000 lower than accounting income (£150,000 - £20,000). We<br />

know from the earlier part of this section that current tax is based on taxable<br />

profits (rather than accounting profits). Therefore if we were just to ‘plug in’ the<br />

current tax charge we would show a high profit in the accounts with a small tax<br />

charge. In addition from a balance sheet perspective we would not be showing a<br />

full liability for the tax cost of the profits being recognised. We can see from the<br />

example that ultimately accounting depreciation does catch up with tax<br />

allowances <strong>and</strong> so the deferred taxation cancels. However, in the meantime<br />

deferred taxation ensures that the income statement <strong>and</strong> balance sheet produce<br />

superior <strong>and</strong> more complete information.<br />

3.2.5 Deferred tax assets<br />

These arise in the opposite situation to that outlined above – when taxable profits<br />

are high compared to accounting profits <strong>and</strong> liabilities are therefore overstated.<br />

Another source of deferred tax assets is operating losses – these have been<br />

recognised in the income statement but not in the tax computation which merely<br />

reported a ‘nil’ result. Another way of thinking about this is to imagine that if a<br />

company makes a loss of, say £10m, it should be able to recover this against<br />

future tax liabilities. Therefore the actual economic cost of the loss is £10m X<br />

(1-t) - i.e. less than the actual loss recognised. This ‘shield’ is an asset as it will<br />

be available to decrease future tax liabilities.<br />

Of course this analysis assumes that sufficient future profits will be earned to<br />

recover the value of these losses. <strong>Under</strong> <strong>IFRS</strong> only those deferred tax assets that<br />

are recoverable from future profits are allowed to be recognised. Therefore, the<br />

asset associated with these losses only has value if future profits are earned.<br />

Hence the risk relating to deferred tax assets is the same as the risk of earning<br />

future profits. This point is essentially the justification, outlined in Chapter 2, for<br />

discounting tax shields at the unlevered cost of equity rather than the much lower<br />

cost of debt. The ability to earn future profits is more risky in terms of recovery<br />

than the returns on debt instruments.<br />

=====<br />

111

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!