07.11.2014 Views

Company Valuation Under IFRS : Interpreting and Forecasting ...

Company Valuation Under IFRS : Interpreting and Forecasting ...

Company Valuation Under IFRS : Interpreting and Forecasting ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter Six – The awkward squad<br />

2.3 Oil company tax: Productions Sharing Agreements<br />

Only in a relatively small number of countries do oil companies have title to the<br />

oil that they produce, paying tax on the profit from extraction. These include the<br />

USA, Canada, the UK, Australia, New Zeal<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> Norway, but they remain a<br />

minority. Most oil production occurs under so-called production sharing<br />

agreements (PSAs) or production sharing contracts (PSCs).<br />

<strong>Under</strong> these agreements, the oil company has a contract entitling it to develop the<br />

field. Early cash flows are used to reimburse its capital expenses (cost oil) <strong>and</strong> the<br />

balance is split between the host state oil company <strong>and</strong> a smaller proportion that<br />

accrues to it (profit oil). There are large numbers of variations on this basic theme.<br />

Accounting for PSAs is complex. The company will book as its equity reserves<br />

the proportion of the gross recoverable barrels that it expects to accrue to it as<br />

cost or profit oil. Its turnover <strong>and</strong> profit will be high early in the life of the field,<br />

but once payback has been reached, both will drop into line with its percentage<br />

entitlement to profit oil, which will be much lower. Changes in oil prices will<br />

have the perverse effect of changing depletion charges because a higher price<br />

reduces the proportion of the oil that will accrue to the oil company as cost oil,<br />

increasing its depletion charge per barrel.<br />

Measures of company reserves <strong>and</strong> of its replacement cost of reserves must<br />

therefore be constructed carefully to ensure that it is net entitlement barrels that<br />

are counted in both cases. Tax rates will look very odd, since most of the state<br />

tax-take is removed before the revenue line in the profit <strong>and</strong> loss account.<br />

2.4 Oil company accounts: interpretation <strong>and</strong> modelling<br />

For this section of the book we are going to break with our usual concentration<br />

on <strong>IFRS</strong> accounting, <strong>and</strong> will model an operation that reports under US GAAP.<br />

This is because all of the large international oil companies have their shares listed<br />

on the New York stock market. They all file form 20Fs every year. And it is to<br />

the form 20F that anyone who is interested in modelling them will go for detailed<br />

information on their upstream (exploration <strong>and</strong> production) businesses. We will<br />

however, refer to some <strong>IFRS</strong> driven accounting changes later in the chapter.<br />

As discussed earlier, we shall concentrate merely on upstream operations, since<br />

the downstream is similar to any capital intensive, cyclical industry. The US<br />

GAAP requires that companies with upstream activities account for them<br />

separately, <strong>and</strong> provide the following information: a profit <strong>and</strong> loss account, a<br />

statement of capitalised costs, information about costs incurred during the year, a<br />

statement of reserves with the components of movements in reserves, a discounted<br />

net present value of the year end reserves, <strong>and</strong> a statement showing the drivers to<br />

annual change in the discounted net present value of the year end reserves.<br />

265

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!